similar to: klibc stand-alone build

Package: klibc Version: 1.5.20-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch Hi maks, Since the Ubuntu linux-libc-dev is now installing its asm headers to the multiarch /usr/include/<triplet>/ directory to allow co-installability, I've pushed the attached patch to Ubuntu so klcc knows to include this path when searching

leroy christophe dixit: > Also you can see that it does try to create /lib instead of > /tmp/klibc-install/lib hence my second patch. That actually seems to be by design. I always set SHLIBDIR on the make command line, so it overrides that. bye, //mirabilos -- > Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks. Michael Schmitz on

klibc currently builds and installs differently depending on the locale and umask at build time. This series fixes that. Ben. Ben Hutchings (2): Install headers with consistent mode dash: mkbuiltins: Fix sort order harder scripts/Kbuild.install | 2 +- usr/dash/mkbuiltins | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

initramfs-tools version 0.117 requires 'readlink -f' and 'mount -o defaults' to work. The first two patches were previously submitted but not applied. Ben. Ben Hutchings (3): Implement realpath() readlink: Add -f option mount: Implement -o defaults usr/include/stdlib.h | 2 ++ usr/klibc/Kbuild | 2 +- usr/klibc/realpath.c | 49

I was wondering if it would be possible to add a cpio (extraction) implementation to klibc. Maybe this can be done in a way that the code could bet shared between klibc and init/initramfs.c in the kernel. Background of what I'm trying to do: I want to load an initramfs from flash on a number of different devices. The devices are quite similar but the partition in flash where the initramfs

Hello what is the difference between busybox and klibc? Say, I want to use an initramfs in order to mount root over nfs, I can choose to use klibc with ipconfig and nfsmount? But I can also choose to use busybox with ifconfig and mount. So what's the difference, and why and in which case one is preferable to the other? If it's a FAQ, I'm sorry, just give me the link Thanks

Le 22/08/2013 07:43, leroy christophe a ?crit : > Le 22/08/2013 00:59, Thorsten Glaser a ?crit : >> leroy christophe dixit: >> >>> Also you can see that it does try to create /lib instead of >>> /tmp/klibc-install/lib hence my second patch. >> That actually seems to be by design. I always set >> SHLIBDIR on the make command line, so it overrides that.

Hi, trying to build klibc 1.1.8 on x86 fails on my machine as follows: KLIBCCC dash/trap.o KLIBCCC dash/output.o dash/trap.c: In function 'trapcmd': dash/trap.c:94: warning: unused parameter 'argc' dash/trap.c:94: warning: unused parameter 'argv' dash/trap.c: In function 'decode_signal': dash/trap.c:398: error: 'SIGRTMIN' undeclared (first use in this

Dear all, I am using initramfs and from the kernel document, I know klibc. So i decide to use it. We are working on marvell pxa310 (bought from Intel), and with the tools chain from marvell, I comple klibc as follows: klibc-1.5> ln -s /home/zjujoe/svn/mhlv_2.6/working/songlixin/20081007_kernel_tflashupdate/ linux klibc-1.5>cat 1.sh export KLIBCARCH=arm export

Hello, Since klibc dash last merge is a bit dated yesterday I resyncronised the dash in klibc repo from dc2bc17c7bbe3188cfb0c695dc472b39bcf0b27a up to ec2c84d3c4dba4b74440d72bdd1de416a9acd2a9 commit. Please test it: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc-queue.git http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc-queue.git;a=shortlog Without objections this will land in klibc-1.5.23. It got

Hi hpa & others. Following is a list of issues that I hope to be addressed soon so we are in even better shape for -mm inclusion. 1) rebuild initramfs when content changes. > It is a simple matter of copying in usr/Makefile from the latest > -linus kernel and replace the 10 first lines with the content from > klibc Kbuild file. 2) havesyscalls.h is not deleted after make

Le 22/08/2013 14:36, Thorsten Glaser a ?crit : > leroy christophe dixit: > >> If I set prefix to / and INSTALLROOT to /opt/klibc, klcc is not able to find >> the include files >> If I set prefix to /opt/klibc and SHLIBDIR to /opt/klibc/lib, it is the target >> that tries to load klibc.so from /tmp/klibc-install/lib instead of /lib > INSTALLROOT is some sort of

Hi, Greg - I have a 2.5.70 BK repository, with klibc integrated, at: bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc This repo has the following features: * Completely up-to-date w.r.t. klibc itself. * Kbuild sort of happy, but still needs an eyeball from Kai to figure out why it always rebuilds everything in usr/. * Supports both IP autoconfig and NFS root from initramfs.

Hello! Can someone please help me in building debug version of klibc ? I've cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git , but failed to build it with debug info added "-g" to HOSTCFLAGS in Makefile, but $ make -j KLIBCKERNELSRC=`pwd`/../linux-2.6/usr still strips every debug symbol , and i'm failed to change scripts/Kbuild.klibc and Makefile to remove strip

In case people here don't follow the udev mailing list, udev seems to be quasi-dropping klibc support. Well, see the forwarded message below. As I don't agree with the "omg udev is complex! use glibc!" rationale, I want klibc and udev to remain working with each other.... Assuming some minor breakage in the near future, is klibc open to accepting patches for "basic C

Hopefully I should be up to date with all patches; haven't integrated the module-init-tools, and some of Erik's patches didn't make it for different reasons, which hopefully can be resolved soon. If you have sent another patch which I haven't applied, please do let me know. -hpa

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:14 PM, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:05:46 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev said: >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote: >> > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:54:05 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev said: >> >> Hello! >> >> >> >> Can someone please help me in building

As some people have requested, here is klibc as a historyless patchset against 2.6.17. The patchset consists of two parts: changes to the main kernel code taken straight from the git history (as it is rather few patches), and additions, grouped by rough divisions. The majority of the patches are independent in the sense that they should apply independently, but Makefile/Kbuild files may have to

I'm wondering where things are on the roadmap for klibc and initramfs/early userspace. When will everything be harmonized with the kernel and be the default? What is left to do? I'm in my own little world, but I have a pretty good klibc/hotplug/udev/kinit early userspace that just works (for me). It's taken me a bit to get things to work because I just couldn't find all the

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:54:05 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev said: >> Hello! >> >> Can someone please help me in building debug version of klibc ? >> >> I've cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git , but >> failed to build it with debug info >> >> added