Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[bug] init arguments handling"
2006 May 10
1
[patch] kinit cmdline handling change
Following mail advice from maximilian attems (thanks).
The following patch changes 2 parts of kinit's command line parameter handling.
1) Parse command line parameters passed to kinit *before*
/proc/cmdline, in order to allow overrides
2) Pass this resultant command line to the init program, rather than
forcing the kinit caller to pass all /proc/cmdline parameters to the
kinit call.
2007 Dec 11
0
[git patch] kinit fix, header install cleanup
hello hpa,
due to arch x86 merge and stricter linitian. lintian
complained about empty dirs in the -dev headers package.
hadn't seen that warning yet, so below is the fix.
ah and that other patch was in some other branch..
please pull latest unless sam has a reservation
git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks
for the changes:
Aaron Griffin (1):
[klibc] kinit: skip md
2006 May 12
1
nfsmount inside kinit
Hey all, bug report time. I started tracking this down, but am at a
bit of a loss for time, so I figured I'd report over this list to see
if anyone else has the time to fix this or at least find the error.
When calling nfsmount on it's own, say "nfsmount 1.2.3.4:/home/nfs
/root" it works just fine, however, when calling nfsmount_main from
within kinit (via nfsroot=), things get
2006 Aug 14
2
klibc and udev
In case people here don't follow the udev mailing list, udev seems to
be quasi-dropping klibc support. Well, see the forwarded message
below.
As I don't agree with the "omg udev is complex! use glibc!" rationale,
I want klibc and udev to remain working with each other....
Assuming some minor breakage in the near future, is klibc open to
accepting patches for "basic C
2008 Mar 25
2
bunch of small fixes
hello hpa,
nothing particular stands out,
just syncing with latest Debian upload and subsequent patch emails.
please review merge or nack.
thanks :)
maks
git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks
for the changes:
Aaron Griffin (1):
[klibc] kinit: skip md assembly if mdX exists
Colin Watson (1):
[klibc] mount/umount FUSE support
Harald Jenny (1):
[klibc] fstype:
2006 May 10
1
[patch] skip existing md devices
The following patch will ignore already configured md devices in
kinit. The rationale is that, if an md device already exists, it was
previously assembled by some other tool (e.g. mdadm) and should remain
there. Currently, kinit removes it and attempts to recreate it, which
can cause all sorts of issues, especially in the situation that, the
md device is further encrypted and/or is an lvm
2006 Oct 06
1
Userspace mounts issue
Hello,
I don't know if this is bug-worthy or not It can be fixed in numerous
places, but I think it might make the most sense to do it here....
kinit uses /dev/root to mount the rootfs. In normal userspace, this
causes the root system to be displayed twice in apps like Nautilus, as
/proc/mounts lists rootfs on /dev/root, in addition to the real info
(e.g. ext3 on /dev/hda3).
This is
2006 Apr 09
1
curious unpacking issue
I'm not sure when exactly this started, but currently when I specify a
ramfs image via the initrd line in grub, kinit picks it up as an
initrd and tries (and fails) to unpack it and run linuxrc from it.
I'm assuming this is not the intended behavior. Can anyone point me
into the proper direction for unpacking an initramfs image ontop of
the in-kernel image?
Currently, I am using kernel
2006 May 18
1
should ext3 be detected first?
I must profane ignorance of complicated filesystem stuff, so feel free
to call me out here. Booting a root ext3 drive produces the following
message at boot:
kinit: trying to mount /dev/root on /root with type ext2
EXT2-fs warning (device hda3): ext2_fill_super: warning: mounting ext3
filesystem as ext2
When remounted rw by init, everything looks fine:
$ mount | grep hda3
/dev/hda3 on / type
2006 Jun 06
1
arch.cmd file and init args
I don't really understand the necessity of the /arch.cmd file to be
parsed before /proc/cmdline. It seems simpler to just parse the
program args first before /proc/cmdline. The whole point, as far as I
see, is to composite kernel params based on scripts and/or the
bootloader params. It makes sense to say "arg1=a" should override
(come before) any other arg1, but I see no need to
2006 May 05
3
kinit cmdline handling change
The following patch swaps the command line handling of kinit. It
seems apparent that, if one were to call kinit like so:
kinit root=/foo/bar
They would be attempting to override the /proc/cmdline. As it stands,
kinit parses the /proc/cmdline *first*, meaning the above does not
work.
Just for a simple use case:
User A has an encrypted root device, root=/dev/hda3
Some init scripts detect this,
2006 Mar 22
1
[patch] trivial cleanup
remove 'NFS-Root' from an error message, and get rid of the old_root
check, as it's unused and fails if the target filesystem is mounted
'ro' for no good reason.
--- kinit.c 2006-03-21 23:48:15.000000000 -0600
+++ kinit.c 2006-03-22 01:09:39.000000000 -0600
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
}
}
else if (!S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
- fprintf(stderr, "NFS-Root:
2006 Jun 29
1
problem with raid assembly
The klibc based early-userspace utilites I am using have the ability
to bring up a raid device before control is passed to kinit. This is
done in the case that one needs to do something else to the root
device (i.e. it's encrypted or an lvm volume). That's fine and dandy,
except that kinit reports a mess of errors about the devices, as they
are already loaded. It appears there errors
2006 Jan 27
2
inclusion of alias handling in klibc insmod
Just curious if anyone has done anything similar, as I'd rather not
reporduce work. I'm going to put alias handling (and only alias
handling) into a modified version of insmod. The reason I'm doing
this is to aid in boot time module loading via aliases exposed in
sysfs. Sure, I could include modprobe directly in the initramfs, but
it's a bit large, and I really only need alias
2006 May 18
1
[bug] False debugging with ipconfig
kinit.c contains the following lines before calling ipconfig_main:
#ifdef INI_DEBUG
args[a++] = (char *)"-n";
#endif
In my attempts to debug the NFS mounting, this threw me off for a bit.
(The -n parameter runs a "dry run" and does not actually configure
the network).
Thus, it seems it's actually impossible to debug NFS mounting with the
stock, unpatched klibc. It
2019 Apr 28
0
[klibc:master] run-init: Allow the initramfs to be persisted across root changes
Commit-ID: 603f1bb024a03d9c50a89e7256ae7814292baf06
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=603f1bb024a03d9c50a89e7256ae7814292baf06
Author: Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett at google.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:12:27 -0700
Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
CommitDate: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 17:11:34 +0100
[klibc] run-init: Allow
2006 Jul 11
0
klibc and what's the next step?
[Who wants to be on CC here? I took several names from the posters
to the last lkml and klibc list threads: Olaf Hering, H. Peter Anvin,
Roman Zippel, Jeff Bailey, Aaron Griffin, Gerd Hoffmann, Milton Miller,
Andi Kleen, Jeff Garzik. Since I'm not subscribed I only see the From
unless I am Cc'd].
On Mon Jul 10 21:48:34 PDT 2006, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at
2019 Jan 18
0
[klibc:master] run-init: Add dry-run mode
Commit-ID: 10059fddba9f8bec6aeb0d37d217df6d65e64c3b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=10059fddba9f8bec6aeb0d37d217df6d65e64c3b
Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
AuthorDate: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:50:28 +0000
Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
CommitDate: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 03:08:04 +0000
[klibc] run-init: Add dry-run mode
2010 Aug 25
0
[patch] ipconfig fixes + run-init nit
hello,
Preparing my first klibc maintainenace release. :)
My plan is to have the patches cook in klibc-queue and once
everythings is fine deploy them in the main klibc repo.
Please test/review belows patches.
I plan to release the current queue really soon for klibc 1.5.20
due to the urgent ipconfig fixes. For now you find my patch queue on:
2006 Oct 15
1
lots of spam
Hey guys,
in case you have spam filters to handle this stuff, I've seen quite
alot of spam come across this ML in the past week or so (7 or so).
Just a "heads up" really.
Thanks,
Aaron Griffin