similar to: Support JFS in fstype

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Support JFS in fstype"

2008 Mar 03
0
[BUG][PATCH] fstype: wrong size returned for jfs
[please note that I'm not subscribed to the list] Hi guys, I've noticed that the size returned by the fstype utility was not correct for JFS filesystems (it returns the size in number of HW blocks instead of bytes). Here is a simple patch that addresses it (based on 1.5.7 from the debian package). diff -Nur klibc-1.5.7.orig/usr/kinit/fstype/fstype.c
2017 Oct 27
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On 10/26/2017 08:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: >>>>> A couple
2017 Oct 26
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: > A? couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now available for CentOS 7 as well. > > On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository? >> >> >> On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux!
2017 Oct 26
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: >> > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs >is >> now available for CentOS 7 as well. >> > >> >> Did not have a need to
2006 Dec 10
1
Help with Samba+JFS
I have a network server running FC5, with a hardware raid 3 card using 5 drives, as one large (1.2TB) partition in JFS. I chose JFS because of a recommendation for performance from a MythTV tutorial, but I don't really know much about file systems and am suspecting JFS to be causing my problems. I run samba, apache and MythTV on this machine, and there is essentially only one problem as far
2008 Oct 01
1
JFS in CentOS
Hello all, I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years. I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of installation, the only FS choices for the largest partition, 120GB, were ext2 and ext3. I chose ext3, but now am wishing
2020 Sep 25
2
JFS for CentOS 7
On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. >> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?
2008 Nov 20
1
XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
Hi folks... trying to pick between jfs and xfs for a filesystem. In the past we've used jfs with CentOS + centosplus, however, an older post indicated that this may not be the best choice as the version of jfs included with the centosplus kernel would only be as new as the version that was included in the 2.6.18 kernel as RH doesn't backport fixes... It looks like xfs isn't part of
2020 Sep 15
2
JFS for CentOS 7
I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?
2020 Sep 27
1
JFS for CentOS 7
On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the
2017 Apr 18
1
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
H wrote: > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now > available for CentOS 7 as well. > > On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the >> same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your >> repository? >> I don't know about this - at home, I'm
2007 Nov 04
1
Question about centosplus kernel and jfs...
Hello I run the latest kernel from centosplus and use a JFS partition. Even though the jfs tools are installed, when the server crashes, it doesn't run fsck.jfs automatically when at boot time it detects that the partition is corrupted I have to run fsck.jfs manually and mount the drive. Is there a way to make fsck.jfs run automatically if required ? (I recently moved from Fedora to
2017 Apr 11
4
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository? On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux! wrote: > yum -y install http://mirrors.coreix.net/elrepo/elrepo/el6/x86_64/RPMS/kmod-jfs-0.0-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm > > (that's for 64bit, adjust the url accordingly for 32bit) > > it won't hose your
2017 Mar 10
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
I am a bit of a noob with Linux and Centos but would like to be able to access an old external USB disk formatted JFS by OS/2. I have seen there is a kmod-jfs package on elrepo that ought to work with Centos 6 but am unsure how to install kmods without hosing my existing system... If anyone would like to be so kind to give me a short how-to, I would be very grateful. Thank you.
2004 Mar 31
2
tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors.
I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors. The test is simple: format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a disk surface damage and then run fsck. seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and ext3, for jfs I don't know Result: jfs: ---- total
2004 Aug 05
2
Issues using samba 3 with linux & IBM JFS case-insensitive FS?
Hi, I'm wondering what issues / problems I might run into if I'm using samba 3 on linux with the IBM JFS filesystem installed to be case-insensitive. I've had no luck finding anyone who says they've tried it. I'm having trouble with a group of Windows based developers programming in Delphi (Pascal) and Foxpro who seem to have real problems keeping the case of filenames
2005 Jul 14
1
a comparison of ext3, jfs, and xfs on hardware raid
I'm setting up a new file server and I just can't seem to get the expected performance from ext3. Unfortunately I'm stuck with ext3 due to my use of Lustre. So I'm hoping you dear readers will send me some tips for increasing ext3 performance. The system is using an Areca hardware raid controller with 5 7200RPM SATA disks. The RAID controller has 128MB of cache and the disks
2006 Feb 05
1
Add swap support to fstype, second version
This patch adds support for swap detection to fstype (to be applied on top of the previous luks patch). The patch is now against klibc's git tree instead of klibc-1.2. Signed-off-by: David H?rdeman <david@2gen.com> -- fstype.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ swap_fs.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --------------
2005 Feb 04
4
Problems with dovecot using Maildir on JFS.
Howdy, I have dovecot installed on CentOS (rhel3 clone), and I'm using Dag's dovecot package. I have postfix setup to deliver to Maildir, in /home. The /home volume was formatted with JFS. In this setup, both Outlook and Thunderbird would not show any new mail unless they were completely shutdown and restarted. I have moved /home to an ext3 formatted and all is well. Anyone have
2006 Mar 31
0
Probe ext2 and ext3 before minix
Got this bug report for Ubuntu's klibc: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/37528 > In the fstype tool there is a problem if the lower 16 bit of number of > free inodes in a ext3 filesystem happens to match minix filesystem > magic. > > This will cause the system not to boot since ubuntu will attempt to > mount the filesystem as a minix filesystem. I