similar to: including modules into initramfs

I wonder if part of the reasoning behind moving klibc into the Kernel itself and integrating it with kbuild has to do with creating a common base system for the initramfs that is meant to work across all Linux distros? I'm very skeptical that such a thing can be created in a way that would satisfy everyone, and maintained peacefully with no forks. I've been helping Jeff Bailey of

Sparked from the discussion on the list, I've put my antispam plugin into git and split up the code into a frontend and possibly multiple backends. See http://git.sipsolutions.net/dovecot-antispam.git/ (URL functions as both gitweb and git URL) Andreas, I took your README file and adjusted it, I hope you don't mind. I didn't fork from your git tree because you'd already

Hi, Here's a try at writing an initramfs HOWTO. This is basically a write-up of a number of interesting emails I collected over time. It could probably use an editor, more fact-checking and a bunch of other good things, but it should be better than nothing ;-) Daniel -------------- next part -------------- INITRAMFS HOWTO 0) What are klibc and initramfs? Initramfs is a ramfs into which

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> Declaring the factor is counter-intuitive, and people are prone to using small(-ish) values even when that makes no sense. Change the DECLARE_EWMA() macro to take the fractional precision, in bits, rather than a factor, and update all users. While at it, add some more documentation. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> Declaring the factor is counter-intuitive, and people are prone to using small(-ish) values even when that makes no sense. Change the DECLARE_EWMA() macro to take the fractional precision, in bits, rather than a factor, and update all users. While at it, add some more documentation. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at

initramfs-tools version 0.117 requires 'readlink -f' and 'mount -o defaults' to work. The first two patches were previously submitted but not applied. Ben. Ben Hutchings (3): Implement realpath() readlink: Add -f option mount: Implement -o defaults usr/include/stdlib.h | 2 ++ usr/klibc/Kbuild | 2 +- usr/klibc/realpath.c | 49

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29934 Summary: X locks up when hotplugging second monitor Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Hello, I would like to know if initrd is here to stay, now that klibc and initramfs are ready. As the multipath-tools maintainer, I'm facing the choice to 1) put the multipath configuration tool in the initrd * dynamic binary is possible * storage hba drivers as modules loaded * no klibc limitations (no mntent for libsysfs ...) 2) put the multipath configuration tool in the initramfs *

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29935 Summary: X locks up with second monitor with DPMS Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 Summary: Nouveau fails totally on new Macbook Unibody 13.3" Ubuntu (xorg.0.log included) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component:

Hey, Sorry for dropping in like this, couldn't find any information on this and I guess I'm too lazy to read all the relevant bits and pieces of the kernel sources to find out: I'm currently running encrypted root and swap, but would still like to use suspend to disk. Would early userspace be capable of inserting the crypto-loop module into the kernel, load the keys off my

Hi Johannes. I wanted to try out the antispam plugin for a Dovecot 1.1 install, only to learn that 1.1 is actually not supported. Are there any plans to remedy this? If not, is it known how much effort is required? (i.e. could I do it myself?). Thanks, Anders.

On 4/19/06, Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 22:56 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > > > libdspam instead of system("dspam...") > > That's a lot of work, how about calling to the dspam server instead? I'm about to start building a system for ~10,000 users, using dovecot, and was going to use dspam with it... Is

This fix has been implemented in preparation for the upcoming klibc merge in -mm. But as it fixes a real (but rare I hope) bug in vanilla kernel it will be added to my pending 2.6.17 kbuild queue. I've done quite some changes to the gen_initramfs script and being shell programming newbie review by more experienced shell hackers would be appreciated. I did a git mv

I've been having an exchange of e-mails with Bryan O'Sullivan regarding this problem. I thought it time to bring it to the list. I've run into a problem where my initramfs archives get this during bootup: checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (ungzip failed); looks like an initrd The same .cpio archive works if I don't gzip it. I stuck a bunch of debug statements into

Hi, I looked through the web and the list archives, but couldn't find how to set up the following: - dovecot with ssl/tls enabled - login from localhost allowed with and without tls - login from remote hosts only allowed via tls Is that possible at all? I'm using debian/unstable so its version 0.99.10.4-3. Thanks, johannes -- http://www.sipsolutions.de/ Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes

Hello all, I am currently setting up a new mail server with Qmail, OpenLDAP and Dovecot in CentOS-4.4. Qmail version is 1.03, OpenLDAP is 2.3 and Dovecot version is dovecot-1.0-3_50.rc27(RPM). I have successfully installed and tested it. But I have two issues with the current setup: #1. I am using dovecot LDA and configured the OpenLDAP such that the mail be delivered to the virtual users

Hi everyone, I've been thinking of phasing out my spamassassin installation (it's hardly doing me any good these days) in favour of dspam. Now since I'm working on this anyway, I thought I'd configure it so when users get any spam, it is delivered into a special folder. I figure I need the 1.0 test series for this, so I can make that folder fixed. But, I also want to allow

Here's a new version, it compiles (and appears to work) except the part in "copy_reclassified". Can anyone help me (probably only Timo knows how) with that? http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/edit/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration/pseudo-code johannes

Hi, Since debian just updated to beta 2, I updated the dspam plugin for that. Also, I added ignoring a Trash folder, Taivo please test if it works for you (but you will need to patch again for dspam daemon mode!) As always: http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-dspam-integration johannes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: