similar to: [PATCH] use reliable nfs mount options per default

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[PATCH] use reliable nfs mount options per default"

2005 May 22
1
[patch 11/12] Unpleasantness in linux/nfs_mount.h
There is a conflict in glibc between <linux/in.h> and <netinet/in.h>: one defines protocols with an enum, the other does the same, but adds a self-define for every enumerated value. #define IPPROTO_IP IPPROTO_IP This means the two cannot be mixed, and since loads of include files refer to <netinet/in.h>, effectively <linux/in.h> cannot be used with glibc. Since
2019 Oct 07
0
[klibc:master] nfsmount: Use kernel client's default value for timeo option
Commit-ID: 886783e7a10fb7a638bc6034e4cdcb6296cea6a1 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=886783e7a10fb7a638bc6034e4cdcb6296cea6a1 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:18:41 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:27:49 +0100 [klibc] nfsmount: Use kernel
2011 Jul 08
4
[PATCH 0/4] usr/kinit checkpatch
Various coding style fixes checkpatch warns about. The goal is not to be 100% checkpatch compliant, but to have more consistent coding style. As this is a trivial patch serie, will land in 24 hours in klibc git, unless of course ml review hits a bugger. Checked with size(3) that the generated kinit, fstype, ipconfig and nfsmount are the same. maximilian attems (4): [klibc] ipconfig: reduce
2008 Mar 25
2
bunch of small fixes
hello hpa, nothing particular stands out, just syncing with latest Debian upload and subsequent patch emails. please review merge or nack. thanks :) maks git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks for the changes: Aaron Griffin (1): [klibc] kinit: skip md assembly if mdX exists Colin Watson (1): [klibc] mount/umount FUSE support Harald Jenny (1): [klibc] fstype:
2006 Jun 26
0
[klibc 14/43] Remove in-kernel nfsroot code
The in-kernel nfsroot code is obsoleted by kinit. Remove it; it causes conflicts. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 161e1dc16ec1129b30b634a2a8dcbbd1937800c5 tree c30da837d746fe65d8a13ccf6f27bd381948edb4 parent 018604e070e143657abcf0cb256a1e2dda205d97 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sat, 20 May 2006 16:24:05 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at
2019 Jan 18
0
[klibc:master] nfsmount: support nfsvers= and vers= options
Commit-ID: c4b811a1e4647224ddc717fac59900d16d0e9d4d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=c4b811a1e4647224ddc717fac59900d16d0e9d4d Author: Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste.jonglez at imag.fr> AuthorDate: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:22:21 -0700 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 03:08:04 +0000 [klibc] nfsmount: support
2017 Sep 14
0
[PATCH] nfsmount: support nfsvers= and vers= options
The standard mount option nowadays to specify NFS version is "nfsvers", as documented in nfs(5) on modern Linux systems. Up to now, nfsmount only supported the old "v2" or "v3" boolean options. Extend option parsing to support both "nfsvers=X" and "vers=X", with X being equal to either 2 or 3 (nfsmount does not support NFSv4 at present). If both
2008 Jun 05
2
RESEND [PATCH][BUGFIX] Fix termination of the spoofing portmapper
Hi, I'm resending since I got no feedback: I assume that the message was lost... The attached patch fixes a few bugs related to the spoofing portmapper used by nfsmount. Regards, Louis -- Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes -------------- next part
2003 May 22
0
[PATCH 2.5.69 2/3] Remove NFS root support from the kernel
This patch removes support for use of NFS as a root filesystem from the kernel. It also updates the documentation to reflect this. b/Documentation/nfsroot.txt | 97 +++--- b/arch/arm/def-configs/a5k | 1 b/arch/arm/def-configs/adi_evb | 1 b/arch/arm/def-configs/adsbitsy | 1 b/arch/arm/def-configs/anakin | 1
2012 Jun 22
1
[PATCH] Fix wrong NFS umount path
Hi, When mounting a NFS share and an error occurs for some reason, the NFS share is not unmounted correctly: the local path is used instead of the remote path in the umount_v[23]() call. This patch fixes this. I found this while debugging some problems mounting the root file system on NFS in a test system; I saw this in the logs (/mnt/duplicated is the legitimate remote path): Jun 21
2009 Aug 11
1
nfs MNT include cleanup
2ad780978b7c0c3e7877949f098cbd06e7c73839 broke klibc build MNTPROC_MNT and MNTPROC_UMNT no longer defined. usr/kinit/nfsmount/mount.c: In function ?mount_call?: usr/kinit/nfsmount/mount.c:179: error: ?MNTPROC_MNT? undeclared (first use in this function) usr/kinit/nfsmount/mount.c:179: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once usr/kinit/nfsmount/mount.c:179: error: for each function
2005 Nov 22
3
Mounting smbfs
People, When I try to mount a network share with the following command, using kubuntu 5.10: sudo mount -t smbfs -o username=myusername,passwork=myuserpassword //esotericVAIO/Downloads /mnt/vaioDownloads I get to following error message mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //esotericVAIO/Downloads, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found
2012 Jan 11
1
[PATCH] nfsmount: defeat dummypmap compiler warning
Without this patch gcc 4.6 warns: KLIBCCC usr/kinit/nfsmount/dummypmap.o usr/kinit/nfsmount/dummypmap.c: In function 'dummy_portmap': usr/kinit/nfsmount/dummypmap.c:191:13: warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds] Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen at google.com> --- usr/kinit/nfsmount/dummypmap.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
2008 May 01
2
CentOS 4.5 - mounting remote windows fileserver using smb or cifs
Hi I need to mount a windows share on a CentOS 4.5 box running stock kernel etc - I have tried using cifs and also smbfs My fstab looks like //share/name /mount/point smbfs username=user,password=password,uid=useridhere 0 0 or the same using cifs When i try and mount that i get the following errors depending on the share type smbfs: mount_data version 1919251317 is not supported CIFS
2005 Jul 31
5
Shared versus static linked executables - and strip
I'm still pondering with kbuild and klibc. Next in line was to get ipconfig support in the kernel (build wise). A little challenge that is bigger than anticipated was to create a shared executable. This required a far bigger rewrite of Kbuild.klibc than originally planned. The good part is that I now managed to treat linking of objects with single and multiple .o files almost the same.
2006 May 12
1
nfsmount inside kinit
Hey all, bug report time. I started tracking this down, but am at a bit of a loss for time, so I figured I'd report over this list to see if anyone else has the time to fix this or at least find the error. When calling nfsmount on it's own, say "nfsmount 1.2.3.4:/home/nfs /root" it works just fine, however, when calling nfsmount_main from within kinit (via nfsroot=), things get
2020 Nov 09
4
[[PATCH v1 0/3] Fix clang build warnings
New clangs emit some warnings. The code isn't wrong, but should be updated to prevent warning creep. Bill Wendling (3): [klibc] dash: shell: Fix clang warnings [klibc] dash: shell: Fix clang warnings about format string [klibc] Kbuild: use an enum to silence a clang warning usr/dash/eval.c | 6 +++--- usr/dash/jobs.c | 2 +- usr/kinit/nfsmount/dummypmap.c
2019 Sep 15
2
nfsmount default timeo=7 causes timeouts on 100 Mbps
I can't explain why 700 msecs aren't enough to avoid timeouts in 100 Mbps networks, but my tests verify it, so I'm writing to the list to request that you increase the default timeo to at least 30, or to 600 which is the default for `mount -t nfs`. How to reproduce: 1) Cabling: server <=> 100 Mbps switch <=> client Alternatively, one can use a 1000 Mbps switch and
2008 Mar 27
3
difference between busybox and klibc (faq?)
Hello what is the difference between busybox and klibc? Say, I want to use an initramfs in order to mount root over nfs, I can choose to use klibc with ipconfig and nfsmount? But I can also choose to use busybox with ifconfig and mount. So what's the difference, and why and in which case one is preferable to the other? If it's a FAQ, I'm sorry, just give me the link Thanks
2004 Jul 30
4
klibc structure in the kernel
Hi all. Proposal for directory structure in the kernel: usr/include <= _all_ include files usr/include/{net,sys,..} usr/include/arch/$(ARCH) <= arch specific include files *1 usr/klibc <= klibc files usr/klibc/arch/$(ARCH) <= arch specific config and files except include files usr/kinit <= program integrated in the kernel usr/kinit/nfsmount <= used by kinit,