similar to: Disconnect users for a distinct period of time?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Disconnect users for a distinct period of time?"

2015 May 10
2
v2.2.17 release candidate released
> Michael Grimm <trashcan at odo.in-berlin.de> kirjoitti 9.5.2015 kello 23.17: > > Hi ? > > Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16. > > 2.2.17.rc1 will compile on FBSD 10.1 only, if bash has been installed Dovecot hg requires bash
2013 Apr 06
1
replicator/dsync over tcp
Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 24.3.2013, at 23.07, Michael Grimm <trashcan at odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: > >> First of all I did need to extend http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication to get dsync over tcp running without ssl: > .. >> | dovecot: doveadm(test): Error: doveadm_password not set, can't authenticate to remote server > > Updated
2015 May 10
1
FYI: dovecot (008632bdfd2c) compilation woes, and minor glitch regarding update-version.sh
Greg Rivers <gcr+dovecot at tharned.org> wrote: > On Saturday, May 09, 2015 22:25:48 Michael Grimm wrote: >>> or just try if it works if you change it to /bin/sh and use whatever >>> FreeBSD has that pointing to. >> That fails because /bin/sh equals /bin/csh at FBSD. > I don't know if it fails or not, but if it does this is not the reason. > /bin/sh
2015 May 10
1
New York: Matilda, seit Jahren mit dem immer gleichen Outfit - DIE WELT
Cool, und vor allem gut! > http://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article140736122/Matilda-seit-Jahren-mit-dem-immer-gleichen-Outfit.html <http://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article140736122/Matilda-seit-Jahren-mit-dem-immer-gleichen-Outfit.html>
2013 Feb 25
2
v2.2.rc1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig A few fixes since beta2. Also added tcp and tcps (=tcp+ssl) targets for dsync, where the destination needs to be a doveadm-server listener. I'm planning on releasing v2.2.0 in 1-2 weeks if no major problems are found. Please test and report any bugs found. BTW. I've
2013 Feb 25
2
v2.2.rc1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig A few fixes since beta2. Also added tcp and tcps (=tcp+ssl) targets for dsync, where the destination needs to be a doveadm-server listener. I'm planning on releasing v2.2.0 in 1-2 weeks if no major problems are found. Please test and report any bugs found. BTW. I've
2018 May 31
2
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >> >> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication without those issues reported in this thread? >> #) do you get
2018 May 31
2
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > Checking in - this is still an issue with 2.3-master as of today (2.3.devel (3a6537d59)). That doesn't sound good, because I did hope that someone has been working on this issue ... > I haven't been able to narrow the problem down to a specific commit. The best I have been able to get to is that this commit is relatively
2017 Dec 21
1
v2.3.0 release candidate released
Hi Michael, I know about that EoL, but I do believe it has nothing to do with the failure to compile Dovecot, or does it? I am moving to new hardware and latest FreeBSD version soon. In the meantime, I need to run Dovecot on it. On 21 December 2017 at 01:16, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: >
2018 Apr 03
3
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Hi, > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:06:07 +0200 > From: Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Subject: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors > Message-ID: <29998016-D62F-4348-93D1-613B13DA90DB at ellael.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
2018 May 06
3
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Ah yes. The hash I put below is wrong but the commit message I quoted was right. This is the last known working good commit, which was on Mar 6: https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/ff5d02182573b1d4306c2a8c36605c98f217ef3b "doveadm: Unref header search context after use Fixes memory leak, found by valgrind" I've subsequently been able to determine that the bad commit was one of
2018 May 06
2
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Hi Andy, Funny you say that - I've been testing this very problem for some time today to narrow down the commits where I think the problem started occurring. So far I have been able to roll forward to commit from git: 74ef8506dcb946acc42722683e49fdcb964eed19 >> "doveadm: Unref header search context after use" . So far I have been running on that code for a few hours
2018 Jun 06
7
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Should be fixed by https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/a952e178943a5944255cb7c053d970f8e6d49336 <https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/a952e178943a5944255cb7c053d970f8e6d49336> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20180606/996cfe38/attachment.html>
2015 May 09
10
v2.2.17 release candidate released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16. * Dovecot no
2015 May 09
10
v2.2.17 release candidate released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.17.rc1.tar.gz.sig Quite a lot of changes, so here's a release candidate first. If no problems are reported I'll make v2.2.17 release early next week. Please test especially non-Linux systems as there are some larger configure/Makefile changes done since v2.2.16. * Dovecot no
2018 Apr 02
1
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Hi [This is Dovecot 2.3.1 at FreeBSD STABLE-11.1 running in two jails at distinct servers.] I did upgrade from 2.2.35 to 2.3.1 today, and I do become pounded by error messages at server1 (and vice versa at server2) as follows: | Apr 2 17:12:18 <mail.err> server1.lan dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(server2.lan): I/O has stalled, \ no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail_change, last
2016 Dec 22
1
dsync for subscription on public/shared folder
Hello, I already wrote regarding that, but maybe it sounded too complex. I will write it a bit softer now. The replication through dsnyc works perfectly with one exception. I am having an issue with the replication of the subscriptions file on shared folder. We have a public mailbox defined: namespace public-test { location = maildir:/opt/mail/_public/test prefix = public/test/
2018 Jun 07
1
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Am 2018-06-07 07:34, schrieb Remko Lodder: > On 7 Jun 2018, at 07:21, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> > wrote: >> Still not quite right for me. >> >> Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: >> dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 >> seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) >>
2017 Dec 20
2
v2.3.0 release candidate released
What am I missing here: OS = FreeBSD 8.4 Here is how it fails during `gmake`: mv -f .deps/test_auth_cache-test-auth-cache.Tpo .deps/test_auth_cache-test-auth-cache.Po gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth -I../../src/lib-test -I../../src/lib-dict -I../../src/lib-dns -I../../src/lib-http -I../../src/lib-sql -I../../src/lib-settings -I../../src/lib-old-stats
2018 Mar 13
1
trashcan on dist. repl. volume with geo-replication
Hi Kotresh, thanks for your repsonse... answers inside... best regards Dietmar Am 13.03.2018 um 06:38 schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar: > Hi Dietmar, > > I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. > > 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? no, trashcan is also enabled on slave. settings are the same as on master but trashcan on slave is complete