Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[Advice] CentOS6 + KVM + bonding + bridging"
2003 Jun 18
3
ext3 2.4.21 htree tests
Hi,
Just thought I'd share some test results of mine in case anyone is
interested.
Basically the tests are siumulating what our product does with files -
although the tests do it a lot quicker (not as many files though).
The test is to create 1 million files (each containing the text of the
file number) spread over a number of directories. The files are then
removed in the same manner as
2013 Jan 09
3
PESQ calculated MoS-Values for Speex
Hello,
I just signed up to this mailing-list (note: my first mailing list at all),
because I'm having some problems related to speex.
Let me just introduce you to what I'm doing.
I am writing a short (really short) paper about VoIP techniques, especially
audio codecs for speech.
I pointed out basic technologies behind audio codecs; vector quantization,
lpc, long-term prediction and some
2013 Jan 09
0
PESQ calculated MoS-Values for Speex
OK. Different mailing lists are set up differently. This list is unusual because your answers only go to the person who replied to you. So if you want the other people on the listserv to see your answer, you should make sure that Speex-dev at xiph.org<mailto:Speex-dev at xiph.org> is added to the TO: field of your outgoing message. Hopefully someone else will also attempt to answer your
2007 Oct 02
1
0/0 is not valid, though the man page says it is
Hi,
The man page for nsd.conf claims the following syntax is valid:
provide-xfr: 0/0 NOKEY
However, this gives the error:
/var/dnsx/nsd.zones:9: error: Bad ip4 address '0'
The following does work:
provide-xfr: 0.0.0.0/0 NOKEY
So either the code is wrong, or the man page :)
Paul
2000 Apr 26
2
Rapid transfers cause kernel panic
Our site has been experiencing problems with Samba causing kernel panics
under heavy use. We are running Mandrake 7.0 and Samba 2.0.6. We are no
longer using the distro included with Mandrake - we actually downloaded
the 2.0.6 release and recompiled. Downloading from Samba shares causes no
problems - and downloads are frequent and heavy - but uploading similar
amounts of data leaves a catatonic
2011 Jan 17
2
nic bonding
I've just setup nic bonding on our server (DL585-G7 running Centos 5.5 x86_64) as detailed on the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces and all seems fine but from other "howto's" I've seen on the web, they're should be a /proc/net/bond0/info
As far as I can see, I don't have one and I'm not sure if it should be there or its absence is a
2007 Dec 17
1
Bonding problem in CENTOS4
I use bonding under CENTOS4.5 x32_62.
I have these weird messages when I'm restarting network.
Do you have any ideas how to fix this?
(there is similar bug for centos5 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2404, but the author says that it worked for him in centos4...)
Thanks
Vitaly
Dec 17 08:34:21 3_10 kernel: bonding: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of eth0 - 00:1A:64:0A:DC:9C - is still in
2008 Jul 04
4
Problem with Bonding Driver
Hi,
I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of
GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1).
All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary
interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different
options to the bonding module for each bond. I have tried every
conceivable incantation of options and cannot get the
2008 Oct 24
1
bonding over bridge or bridge over bonding ?
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any
success. Here is my configuration:
ifcfg-eth0:
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
ifcfg-eth1:
DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7
ONBOOT=yes
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
ifcfg-bond0:
DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=br0
USERCTL=no
ifcfg-bridge0:
DEVICE=br0
2019 Sep 20
2
7.7.1908, interface bonding, and default route
Hi!
I just upgraded a machine to 7.7.1908 and the default route is not being
set on boot. This particular server has a bonded interface, and the
corresponding configuration for the master is (
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0):
TYPE=Bond
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
NAME=bond0
DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=10.3.20.131
PREFIX=24
2017 Apr 18
2
anaconda/kickstart: bonding device not created as expected
Hi,
I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding
device via kickstart (via PXE).
I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of
the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is
balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an
independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device
2015 Jun 11
2
Bridges, VLANs, Bonding on CentOS 7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
some months ago I ran into a hassle with following, quite simple
config that works on CentOS 6 and CentOS 5 extremeley well, for years.
However, I have problems getting it running on CentOS 7.
,-- bond0.100 -- brbond0.100 -> (VMs)
eth0 (eno1 on C7) --. |
|--- bond0 ----|--
2007 Aug 13
3
bonding tap devices
Hello list,
Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that
bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple
mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case
the 24Mbit line goes down.
Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two
OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices:
+-- tap0 (A)---
2003 May 23
1
ethernet bonding ?
HI All.
I have a linux box connected to a switch network with 2 network interfaces, how would I able to ''trunk'' these 2 interfaces? options I can see are:
- ethernet bonding
- iproute2?
- teql
Which one are the best to use?
I''m curretly having problem with ethernet bonding, my setup are as follow:
ip add: 192.168.10.30/24
I do:
# modprobe bonding
# ip addr add
2007 Oct 16
7
Xen with NIC Bonding on Debian Etch ?
Hi guys,
I am trying to get bonding work on a debian etch system. I searched
already in the mailing list but unfortunately I couldnt find a proper
solution. This is what i did so far.
- Installed Debian Etch on my server
- Installed the following packages for using Xen from the Debian repository:
xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae
linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686
linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686
xen-tools
2008 Sep 12
1
Regd: Ethernet Channel Bonding Clarification is Needed
Dear All,
Please ignore my previous mail
I have using CentOS 4.4 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.9-42.EL
I have configured Cluster Suite with 2 servers
Server 1 : 192.168.13.110 IP Address and hostname is primary
Server 2 : 192.168.13.179 IP Address and hostname is secondary
Floating : 192.168.13.83 IP Address (Assumed by currently active server)
I have configured Ethernet Channel Bonding in
2018 Oct 04
3
Need help with Linux networking interfaces and NIC bonding
Hello everyone
I am running into some strange issues when configuring networking
interfaces on my physical server running Centos 7.5. Let me give you an
overview of what's going on:
We have a physical server, running CentOS 7.5. This server has one 4 port
NIC and one 2 port NIC and a Dell IDRAC port. The first port of the 4 port
NIC, em1, is used for Management traffic. The first port of
2013 Aug 14
12
xen 4.3 - bridge with bonding under Debian Wheezy
Hi all,
i have a xen 4.3 installation and would like to have a bridge bond szenario:
***
eth0 eth1
| |
bond0
|
br0
|
vif = [ ''bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'' ]
***
With the network script in debian wheezy
***
/etc/network/interfaces
auto bond0
iface bond0 inet manual
slaves eth0 eth1
2007 Apr 12
1
bonding
I four nodes setup to do active-backup bonding and the drivers loaded
for the bonded network interfaces vary between tg3 and e100. All
interfaces with the e100 driver loaded report errors much like what you
see here:
bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2,
disabling it
e100: eth2: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for
2012 Sep 14
1
Bonding Eth interfaces - unexpeceted results
CentOS 6.2.........
Why do the physical interfaces report (correctly) that they're negotiated at 1000Mb/s, but when I `cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0` I get 100Mbps for the member interfaces, and when I ` mii-tool bond0` I get 10Mbps for the bond?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethtool em1
Settings for em1:
Supported ports: [