similar to: Dovecot setuid, setgid, permission denied Problem!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Dovecot setuid, setgid, permission denied Problem!"

2017 Jan 21
2
mail-trends+Dovecot
Hi, Out of curiosity, has anyone managed to use mail-trends[0] to analyse their e-mails. I thought about trying it out, but got stuck midstream. The mail-trends scripts work very well with gmail, but because they say it is supposed to work with _any_ IMAP server, I thought I could get it running with Dovecot too. I know this is NOT a mail-trends support group though, but I believe there is
2008 Jun 12
1
[Bug 1310] chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1310 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Blocks| |1452 --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller
2005 Jul 06
1
setuid/setgid bits
version: rsync v2.6.1 (+ a minor, unrelated patch). I'm rsyncing files (not as root) and am happy (indeed, for what I want, delighted) that the files at the target side end up owned by the account doing the rsync. However, I've found that if I have a setuid/setgid file on the source side, the target file ends up setuid/setgid too (but under a different id!). This happens whether
2002 Jul 19
0
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
I think this is more a philosophical issue. Some people want all applications to be like windows. "Are you sure you want to delete this file" <YES> "really"<yes>"it might make something stop working<yes>"permission denied". Unix assumes you know what you're doing. If you don't, tough. There's no reason you can't make a
2002 Jul 19
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Dan Stromberg wrote: > Many apologies. If we update on the nfs server, as we've intended all > along, we should have no .nfs* files. Well, here's one thing that could make them, even if they're being created only directly, not over NFS. I'm watching the directory you're syncing into. I open the file while it's still there. You delete it, and
2007 Apr 24
2
chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
Hi OpenSSH developers, I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased with the work you've done. I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838 when using chmod sftp client command it appears that setuid / setgid bits are
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
> > > never seen a file created with a newline in the filename > > (except, perhaps as a test). The newline in filename issue > > And in security exploits :-) Given a newline-based format, one *must* > quote or deny newlines in filenames, not assume they're rare. (No > obvious reason not to use URL-style %-quoting, or mime-style > =-quoting, if you want to
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
> > This brings up an issue that I believe can be solved in a simpler way than > > with brute force C code. I suspect some of you will cringe when you hear > > this, but a taintperl log parsing program would be best for this. rsync > > could generate a verbose log file that is not human readable, designed to > > be read by a perl postprocessing script. I think this
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
I vote for the consistent, complete log format as a solution to this sort of thing, and those who need to take non-rsync related actions based on what rsync did can write their own applications to do so. People keep coming up with some particular thing they need done for their own application, and want rsync to do that too. rsync is a tool to make one thing exactly like another. It is not
2010 Aug 27
1
Some questions about Shared mailboxes
Hi, again. 1. Can somebody explain me about dovecot's shared mailboxes? 2. What does it do while searching shared mailboxes (debug_log cannot explain it)? What files is it looking for? 3. Need i set dovecot-shared file into directory which are shared (if i want to have separate flags for separate users)? 4. Some errors are hard to understand. For example, # pwd
2017 May 30
1
Question about how to serve many imap users on some mailbox.
Hi, dear dovecot users! I am running 2.2.29.1 (e0b76e3) on FreeBSD. In my case, one mailbox info at example.com is shared between 5-10 managers. Sometimes they complains that no new messages displayed in folder message count list in brackets (bold number if new messages exists), but when they click on the imap folder (for example Inbox) they could see many new mails. There not only Inbox
2014 Feb 24
0
Dovecot stopped with "master: Fatal: kevent(): Invalid argument"
Hi, after more than 20 days uptime, Dovecot stopped with the following logged in /var/log/messages: - master: Fatal: kevent(): Invalid argument dovecot -n: # 2.2.10: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64 auth_default_realm = xxx.com.ua auth_mechanisms = plain login default_client_limit = 3000 dict { quotadict =
2011 Apr 21
7
[Bug 1893] New: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893 Summary: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2018 Mar 08
0
Authentication Problem with dovecot-2.3.0.1
> On 08 March 2018 at 10:00 Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 8 March 2018 at 10:09, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > On 07.03.2018 22:07, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > I am a little confused here. > > > > I have been running 2.2.34 which I installed in /opt/dovecot2.2
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.33 Severity: normal I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid... - Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of
2013 Feb 22
2
High CPU Usage with 2.2
I am seeing a rather high CPU usage with 2.2 now: last pid: 30725; load averages: 4.58, 27.36, 25.49 up 0+15:36:12 16:02:53 103 processes: 4 running, 98 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU: 34.5% user, 0.0% nice, 65.4% system, 0.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 602M Active, 1767M Inact, 254M Wired, 6116K Cache, 112M Buf, 490M Free Swap: 5900M Total, 5900M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE
2018 Mar 07
2
Authentication Problem with dovecot-2.3.0.1
I am a little confused here. I have been running 2.2.34 which I installed in /opt/dovecot2.2 I installed 2.3.0.1 to /opt/dovecot23 I then used config files from /opt/dovecot2.2/etc/dovecot to /opt/dovecot2.3/etc/dovecot and all I did was sed -i.BAK 's/dovecot2.2/dovecot2.3/g'. Dovecot started and was running file. Next, I manually crafted config files for 2.3.0.1 based on the example
2010 Oct 21
1
Correct permissions for base_dir??
I am having problems with dovecot regarding base_dir: I have :: base_dir = /opt/dovecot2/var/run/ For some reason, I have to set permissions to(chmod -R 1777 /opt/dovecot2/var/) for dovecot to run properly, but when I start dovecot, I see this: [root at gw] /opt/dovecot2/etc/dovecot# less /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log Oct 21 16:15:27 master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=72634 uid=0
2019 Apr 10
3
/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: Permission denied
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 17:50, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > On 10 Apr 2019, at 08:36, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: Permission den)) > > One other detail: > > /var/run/dovecot/stats-writer: > 0 srw-rw---- 1 root dovecot 0 Apr 10 08:47 stats-writer
2010 Aug 26
3
Shared mailboxes with dovecot.
Hi, first of all for forgive me for my english. I have several questions. 1. There are 2 user/passwd databases in my setup - ldap and mysql. when i login into one user with telnet 127.0.0.1 143 and share inbox to some users - records in dict-file apears? but if i delete some acls - records indict-file stays same. 2. I see in error.log such errors. can somebody explain what do dovecot list