similar to: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option"

2013 Aug 16
6
[PATCH-v3 0/4] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest per-cpu ida bits here, along with Christoph Lameter's latest comments: [PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137160026006974&w=2 The first patch is a
2013 Aug 16
6
[PATCH-v3 0/4] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest per-cpu ida bits here, along with Christoph Lameter's latest comments: [PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137160026006974&w=2 The first patch is a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: Looks reasonable. > lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- I still don't think it should be in this file. You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: Looks reasonable. > lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- I still don't think it should be in this file. You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: > > > > Looks reasonable. > > > > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback: > > > > Looks reasonable. > > > > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > + while (1) { > > > + spin_lock(&pool->lock); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * prepare_to_wait() must come before steal_tags(), in case > > > + * percpu_ida_free() on another cpu flips a bit in > > > + * cpus_have_tags > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > + while (1) { > > > + spin_lock(&pool->lock); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * prepare_to_wait() must come before steal_tags(), in case > > > + * percpu_ida_free() on another cpu flips a bit in > > > + * cpus_have_tags > >
2005 Jul 09
1
Remote SIP Connection using Asterisk // Cisco7940's
Yes, I can call the phones, they ring, etc, and call call out, just no outbound audio. Is their any difference in the inbound & outbound audio streams in Asterisk that could cause it, e.g., different ports, protocols, connection/discovery methods, etc? Thanks, Ross ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Carlos Alperin"
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:54 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > What guarantees that this wait will terminate? > > > > > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up; > > > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a > > > tag. If we weren't passed
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:54 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > > > What guarantees that this wait will terminate? > > > > > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up; > > > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a > > > tag. If we weren't passed
2013 Aug 16
0
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works), it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu freelist where the current job can't get to them. We do guarantee that it will always be possible to allocate at least (nr_tags / 2)
2013 Aug 20
5
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:09:06 +0000 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> > > Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works), > it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all > nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu
2013 Aug 20
5
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:09:06 +0000 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> > > Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works), > it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all > nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu
2013 Aug 28
1
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring, > > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was > > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do > > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was
2013 Aug 28
1
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote: > > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring, > > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was > > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do > > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was
2013 Jul 06
3
[PATCH-v2 0/3] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight per-cpu ida bits here: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2 Patch #1 includes target-core setup of
2013 Jul 06
3
[PATCH-v2 0/3] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight per-cpu ida bits here: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2 Patch #1 includes target-core setup of
2006 Aug 02
2
[PATCH 1/6] scsifront/back drivers'' common Makefile and header
# HG changeset patch # User fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp # Node ID 7111077b493ea53ef055ce38098f8af67f87d749 # Parent ed8d345449c176cb5fe0ccff4299da782eb63c08 SCSI frontend and backend drivers'' common Makefile and header Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> diff -r ed8d345449c1 -r 7111077b493e buildconfigs/linux-defconfig_xen0_x86_32 ---
2020 Apr 01
1
[PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:29:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 ??10:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:08:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2020/4/1 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:01:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on