Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio-blk: Fix kconfig option"
2013 Aug 16
6
[PATCH-v3 0/4] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org>
Hi folks,
This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of
target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest per-cpu ida
bits here, along with Christoph Lameter's latest comments:
[PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137160026006974&w=2
The first patch is a
2013 Aug 16
6
[PATCH-v3 0/4] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org>
Hi folks,
This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of
target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest per-cpu ida
bits here, along with Christoph Lameter's latest comments:
[PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137160026006974&w=2
The first patch is a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
Looks reasonable.
> lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
I still don't think it should be in this file.
You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into
the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
Looks reasonable.
> lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
I still don't think it should be in this file.
You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into
the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
> >
> > Looks reasonable.
> >
> > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
> >
> > Looks reasonable.
> >
> > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > > + while (1) {
> > > + spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * prepare_to_wait() must come before steal_tags(), in case
> > > + * percpu_ida_free() on another cpu flips a bit in
> > > + * cpus_have_tags
> >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > > + while (1) {
> > > + spin_lock(&pool->lock);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * prepare_to_wait() must come before steal_tags(), in case
> > > + * percpu_ida_free() on another cpu flips a bit in
> > > + * cpus_have_tags
> >
2005 Jul 09
1
Remote SIP Connection using Asterisk // Cisco7940's
Yes, I can call the phones, they ring, etc, and call call out, just no outbound audio. Is their any difference in the inbound & outbound audio streams in Asterisk that could cause it, e.g., different ports, protocols, connection/discovery methods, etc?
Thanks,
Ross
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Carlos Alperin"
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:54 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > > > What guarantees that this wait will terminate?
> > >
> > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up;
> > > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a
> > > tag. If we weren't passed
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:44:54 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > > > What guarantees that this wait will terminate?
> > >
> > > It seems fairly clear to me from the break statement a couple lines up;
> > > if we were passed __GFP_WAIT we terminate iff we succesfully allocated a
> > > tag. If we weren't passed
2013 Aug 16
0
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com>
Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works),
it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all
nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu freelist
where the current job can't get to them.
We do guarantee that it will always be possible to allocate at least
(nr_tags / 2)
2013 Aug 20
5
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:09:06 +0000 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com>
>
> Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works),
> it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all
> nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu
2013 Aug 20
5
[PATCH-v3 1/4] idr: Percpu ida
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:09:06 +0000 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com>
>
> Percpu frontend for allocating ids. With percpu allocation (that works),
> it's impossible to guarantee it will always be possible to allocate all
> nr_tags - typically, some will be stuck on a remote percpu
2013 Aug 28
1
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring,
> > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was
> > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do
> > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was
2013 Aug 28
1
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:23:58 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > I found things to be quite the opposite - it took 5 minutes of staring,
> > head-scratching, double-checking and penny-dropping before I was
> > confident that the newly-added code actually has nothing at all to do
> > with the current code. Putting it in the same file was
2013 Jul 06
3
[PATCH-v2 0/3] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org>
Hi folks,
This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of
target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight
per-cpu ida bits here:
[PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2
Patch #1 includes target-core setup of
2013 Jul 06
3
[PATCH-v2 0/3] target/vhost-scsi: Add per-cpu ida tag pre-allocation for v3.12
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org>
Hi folks,
This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of
target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight
per-cpu ida bits here:
[PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2
Patch #1 includes target-core setup of
2006 Aug 02
2
[PATCH 1/6] scsifront/back drivers'' common Makefile and header
# HG changeset patch
# User fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
# Node ID 7111077b493ea53ef055ce38098f8af67f87d749
# Parent ed8d345449c176cb5fe0ccff4299da782eb63c08
SCSI frontend and backend drivers'' common Makefile and header
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
diff -r ed8d345449c1 -r 7111077b493e buildconfigs/linux-defconfig_xen0_x86_32
---
2020 Apr 01
1
[PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:29:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/4/1 ??10:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:08:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2020/4/1 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:01:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on