similar to: suggestion for filesystem or general performance optimization

Hi, recently I noticed, that we have some performance issues regarding our central samba fileserver. Red Hat EL 5.8, samba3x-3.5.10-0.109. Doing a rsync, scp or accessing a share from a client and copy large files (e.g. 3 GB ISO), I do get a read / write average about 60 to 90 MB/sec. So LAN and general hardware can work at max. lan speed. But copying or syncing small files, e.g. user profiles

Hi, currently we do have one samba3x-3.5.10-0.109.el5_8 RH EL 5.8 PDC authenticating by our central LDAP server. This PDS also hosts the central fileserver storage for all our +- 600 users, some group shares and roaming profiles. The clients are OS X, Win XP and Win 7. We hope to have all XP 'killed' by end of the year. Furthermore we do have a second stand alone samba server for some

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0533 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 471f54ba5397283d3f5251590236e720589c28103b36630455e431e461d17961 samba3x-3.5.10-0.109.el5_8.i386.rpm

Hi, recently I installed a new GBit connected iSCSI Storage to one of our fileservers. Redhat EL Linux 5.7 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5, kernel 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5PAE, Dell Poweredge 1750, dual Xeon. The transfer speed is very very different, depending on the method I use. Currently I'm the only user accessing that server and there is low network traffic. I know, that there are some overheads

Hi, recently I got my samba/ldap/pdc setup up and running with xp clients. Server: centos 5.5, openldap-2.3.43-12 and samba3x-3.3.8. The new challenge: adding Windows 7 Clients and upgrading to samba 3.3.x I followed a posting from the centos forum (1) which worked so far for the samba update breaking nothing for xp. Than I installed a windows 7 client with the latest patches, changed the

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi List, I'm running a heavily loaded squid server that uses ntlm_auth to provide NTLM authentication. As load has increased over time, I've found the need to increase the number of ntlm_auth processes available to squid as well as the "winbind max clients" value in the smb.conf file. This has worked well up until now but seems I've hit some sort of limit. If I keep the

Hi, we plan to set up a big file storage for media files like uncompressed movies from student film projects, dvd images etc. It should be some sort of archive and will not bee accessed by more than may be 5 people at the same time. The iSCSI RAID we have is about 26TB netto and I'm again faced with the question: How many partitions, which filesystem, which mount options etc. For the User

Hi, I have several samba file servers all running on fully upgraded CentOS-5.8 boxes. They run samba3x-3.5.10-0.108.el5_8.x86_64. After the most recent upgrade I'm seeing the following error in the logs but only on one of the boxes. Apr 23 18:51:19 oldcrescent smbd[3892]: Could not find child 15487 -- ignoring It occurs every 13 minutes with a different PID it doesn't seem to

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

HI I'm running samba3x-3.5.10-0.110.el5_8.x86_64 on a fully updated CentOS-5.8 system as PDC. We upgraded our lab machines to Win7 over the summer The logins work ok and the homes share is being mounted from a separate fileserver. However the login batch command script is not running. It's just a simple script which syncs the system time and mounts another share. Part of smb.conf

Good morning all, I really hate emailing lists, but I've come to a wall that I just cant work out how to get past at the moment, so am hoping for some community assistance if possible. Some background: We are running Windows Server 2003 on all of our domain controllers, and are in the middle of migrating to server 2008 R2. We have unix exentions enabled (rfc2307 I believe), and manage

Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0466 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0466.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: bd761bf38e7466f89f612824f8ac73fe2558ca218a1fca167285f525c2fd58da samba3x-3.5.10-0.108.el5_8.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1126 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1126.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 9a6fa2d1334aa8bafc93794a16be2c8c9b834e1aa6ebc3c44f4b5aa5c12ad5f6 samba3x-3.5.10-0.110.el5_8.i386.rpm

Hi, over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems changed for our users. currently I'm faced with the question: What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question. Big in that context is up to couple of 100 TB may be. O.K. I could install one hardware raid with e.g. N big drives

Hi, I do have an iscsi storage with two raidsets. I'm logged in to the target and get two devices: /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc. After formatting the devices with ext4 I realised, that I had used a wrong label, so I tried to relabel the devices. But now I'm confused: doing a e2label /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc returns always the same label name for both devices. so I did "e2label /dev/sdb

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote: > On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: >> Hi all >> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 >> server >> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. >> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would >> normally do I checked for Centos

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When