similar to: Pseudo R squared in gls model

I found this paper on ANOVA on unequal error variance. Has this be incorporated to any R package? Is there any textbook that discuss the problem of ANOVA on unequal error variance in general? http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532947?cookieSet=1

Dear R-help, I don't understand why Gls gives me an error when trying to fit a model with AR(2) errors, while gls (from nlme) does not. For example: library(nlme) library(rms) set.seed(1) d <- data.frame(x = rnorm(50), y = rnorm(50)) gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) #This works Gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) # Gives error # Error in

Hi, I need to correct for ar(1) behavior of my residuals of my model. I noticed that there are multiple gls models in R. I am wondering if anyone has experience in choosing between gls models. For example, how should one decide whether to use lm.gls in MASS, or gls in nlme for correcting ar(1)? Does anyone have a preference? Any advice is appreciated! Thanks, -- Tom [[alternative HTML

Hello everybody, Please help with connecting the AIC and BIC numbers printed by summary.gls to the logLik number. 1. is the logLik number the true ML or density scaling constants have been omitted? 2. what is the formula for calculating the AIC and BIC from logLik (and how can I see it)? I tried printing summary.gls but it says object not found. Thank you very much. Stephen [[alternative

Dear All, I would like to be able to estimate confidence intervals for a linear combination of coefficients for a GLS model. I am familiar with John Foxton's helpful paper on Time Series Regression and Generalised Least Squares (GLS) and have learnt a bit about the gls function. I have downloaded the gmodels package so I can use the estimable function. The estimable function is very

Hi I have a huge array with series of data. For each cell in the array I fit a linear model, either using lm() or gls() with lm() there is no problem, but with gls() I get an error: Error in glsEstimate(glsSt, control = glsEstControl) : computed gls fit is singular, rank 2 as soon as there are data like this: > y1 <- c(0,0,0,0) > x1 <- c(0,1,1.3,0) > gls(y1~x1)

Dear R-users I am relatively new to R, i hope my many novice questions are welcome. I have problems accessing some objects (specifically the random effects, correlation structure and variance function) from an object of class gls and lme. I used the following models: yah <- gls (outcome~ -1 + as.factor(Trial):as.factor(endpoint)+

Hi, I have fit a model using the rms package with the Gls() function. Is there a way to get the model estimates, std errors, and p-values (i.e. what you get with print(fit)) into latex format? I have tried: f <- Gls(...) latex(f, file='') ... but I get the following error Error in replace.substring.wild(s, old, new, test = test, front = front, : does not handle > 1 * in

A couple weeks ago I posted a message on this topic to r-help, the response was that this seemed like odd behavior, and that I ought to post it to one of the developer lists. I posted to r-sig-mixed-models, but didn't get any response. So, with good intentions, I decided to try posting once more, but to this more general list. The goal is (1) FYI, to make you aware of this issue, in case it

Dear helpers, I wrote a code which estimates a multi-equation model with generalized least squares (GLS). I can use GLS because I know the covariance matrix of the residuals a priori. However, it is a bit slow and I wonder if anybody would be able to point out a way to make it faster (it is part of a bigger code and needs to run several times). Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Carlo

Dear all I use the gls function but in contrast to the lm function in which when I type summary(lm(...))$coef I receive all the coefficients (estimate, Std. Error, t-value and pvalue), with gls when I type summary(gls(...))$coef I only receive the estimate of the reg. coefficient without std. error and t- and p-values. Dou you have any suggestion how to solve my problem? With kind regards

Dear all, For analysis of a longitudinal data set with fixed measurement in time I built a gls model (nlme). For testing hypotheses in this model I used the linear.hypothesis function from the car package. A check with the results obtained in SAS proc MIXED with a repeated statement revealed an inconsistency in the results. The problem can be that the linear.hypothesis function (1) only gives the

Full_Name: W.B.Kloke Version: 1.8.0 OS: FreeBSD-4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (195.253.22.63) I found a parameter evaluation inconsistency in NLME package. I tried to use gls() inside a function, and I wanted use gls() for different subsets of a data frame: prgls <- function(name){ gls( log10(Y)~(cond-1)+(cond-1):t ,pr,subset=subject==name)} Applying this function with a string as parameter

When fitting a simple linear or polynomial regression using lm, R provides a p-value for the whole model as well as for the individual coefficients. When fitting the same models using gls (in order to correct for autocorrelation), there doesn't seem to be a p-value provided for the whole model, although LL, AIC and BIC statistics are provided. Is it possible to obtain a p-value for the whole

Dear Colleagues, We are using the phylog.gls.fit() function from the R package "PHYLOGR" (Diaz-Uriarte R, Garland T: PHYLOGR: Functions for phylogenetically based statistical analyses. 2007. Available at [http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PHYLOGR/index.html]) to correct for lack of independence between data points. (In our particular case, the lack of independence is due to

Dear R-List users, Can anyone explain exactly the difference between Weights options in lm glm and gls? I try the following codes, but the results are different. > lm1 Call: lm(formula = y ~ x) Coefficients: (Intercept) x 0.1183 7.3075 > lm2 Call: lm(formula = y ~ x, weights = W) Coefficients: (Intercept) x 0.04193 7.30660 > lm3 Call:

Hi All I was wondering how to get the same results with gls and lme. In my lme, the design matrix for the random effects is (should be) a identity matrix and therefore G should add up with R to produce the R matrix that gls would report (V=ZGZ'+R). Added complexity is that I have 3 levels, so I have R, G and say H (V=WHW'+ZGZ'+R). The lme is giving me the correct results, I am

Hi all, I am trying to get a handle on gls (package nlme). I have a toy problem: 3 fixed factors (A, B, C), two levels each, 5 replicates per treatment. The response variable is continuous, normal. I have a correlation matrix of the form: > mat A B C A 1.00 0.75 0 B 0.75 1.00 0 C 0.00 0.00 1 which is common to all observations. How do I construct the call to gls? I think I need to

Dear All -- I am trying to use within a little table producing code an anova comparison of two gls fitted objects, contained in a list of such object, obtained using nlme function gls. The anova procedure fails to locate the second of the objects. The following code, borrowed from the help page of anova.gls, exemplifies: --------------- start example code --------------- library(nlme) ##

How does one coerce predict.gls to incorporate the fitted correlation structure from the gls object into predictions? In the example below the AR(1) process with phi=0.545 is not used with predict.gls. Is there another function that does this? I'm going to want to fit a few dozen models varying in order from AR(1) to AR(3) and would like to look at the fits with the correlation structure