similar to: Question concerning anova()

Hi I want to do a series of linear models, and would like to define the input arguments for lm() as variables. I managed easily to define the formula arguments in a variable, but I also would like to have the "subset" in a variable. My reasoning is, that I have the subset in the results object. So I wiould like to add a line like: subs <- dead==FALSE & recTreat==FALSE which

Hi All, I was wondering if someone could help me to solve this issue with lmer. In order to understand the best mixed effects model to fit my data, I compared the following options according to the procedures specified in many papers (i.e. Baayen <http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDsQFjAA

Dear Thierry, thank you for the quick reply. I have only one question about the approach you proposed. As you suggested, imagine that the model we end up after the model selection procedure is: mod2.1 <- lmer(dT_purs ~ T + Z + (1 +T+Z| subject), data =x, REML= FALSE) According to the common procedures specified in many manuals and recent papers, if I want to compute the p_values relative to

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66176 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66176 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau.perflvl kernel parameter doesn't work QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: mr.dash.four at

Hi Denis I have upgraded my samba DC-1 from 4.6.12 to 4.7.4 which has solved the replication issues between DC-1 and DC-2. Now both the DC's are running on 4.7.4. Like Rowland said previously, you should remove all RODC that have been installed prior to Samba 4.7. There are many fixes that have been added since 4.6. Before I remove my RODC's I like to clear out few doubts: 1. Instead of

Hi Denis & Rowland Thanks for the suggestion to trim the smb.conf after which the DC-1 is connecting to the Windows Server 2008 shared folder smbclient -k //IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9 and DC-2 is also connecting after using the DNS name of the Windows server. *You'd better switch your DNS to Bind-DLZ. Internal DNS is not that good for larger site (looking at your DNS domain name, I guess

Hi Arnaud, I'm glad to hear that your test case is working. I however still get my wrong allocation in some non trivial cases : the > pairing constraint is not fulfilled. > > I have tried to modify the 'ensure pairable' pass (the pass undoing some > of the coalescer's work) to always insert register copies for > instructions with the pairable constraint, instead of

Dear All, Sorry for asking a newbie question. I want to ask how to import 1000 datasets whose file names are labelled from data1.dat to data1000.dat into R so that they are named M[1, , ] to M[1000, , ] accordingly. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Ray [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Denis, Thank you for the information. I was under the impression that authentication was done through LDAP. I'm not sure what led me to this belief/understanding. How can I confirm that indeed my Linux member server is authenticating with Kerberos, and that it is encrypted? Is Kerberos traffic always encrypted? Thanks, Tim On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Denis Cardon <dcardon at

Hi Lang, Thanks a lot for taking time to look into this. I will test the fix soon and let you know the results. Cheers, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 17:30:33 Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Apologies for the delayed reply. > > Thank you for the excellent test case - it exposed a subtle bug in the > colorability heuristic. This has been fixed in

Hi Denis Thanks for your response without your crystal ball. I have increased the log level =9 dns:0 on both the servers. It replicates successfully by manually running the command samba-tool drs replicate SERVER2 SERVER1 dc=iumnet,dc=edu,dc=na --full-sync but it is still failing when I check from the samba-tool drs showrepl Also I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix on both the servers

Hi Arnaud, Apologies for the delayed reply. Thank you for the excellent test case - it exposed a subtle bug in the colorability heuristic. This has been fixed in r153958. In case you are curious, the bug was as follows: the PBQP solver applies applies a simplification step to each matrix. When all elements of a matrix row or column are equal, the value for those elements is "pushed

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:43:59 +0100 Fabien Dupont <fdupont@redhat.com> wrote: > We can still find them and run the sysprep, but I have > the feeling that it would be more logical if virt-v2v did the sysprep when > target is oVirt / RHV. This is trickier than you think. For LVM volumes somebody (VDSM) has to lock and prepare the disks for you first and there is no external API to do

Hi Lang, The assert is not triggered any longer on my testcases :) I however still get my wrong allocation in some non trivial cases : the pairing constraint is not fulfilled. I have tried to modify the 'ensure pairable' pass (the pass undoing some of the coalescer's work) to always insert register copies for instructions with the pairable constraint, instead of being smart and

Hi Lang, I have reduced the testcase as much as possible. The log of the run and the dumped graphes are attached. Cheers, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 01:20:35 Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Thanks for attaching those files. I'll take a look at them. > > Commit r153483 adds an option to the PBQP allocator, > "-pbqp-dump-graphs", to

Hi Denis Thanks for your advise I will not use these wordings here. Please check the result below when I run the command on the DC-1 when DC-2 is off or on smbclient -k //IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9 INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9 quota: 9

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64323 Priority: medium Bug ID: 64323 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Severe misrendering in Left 4 Dead 2 Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: bryancain3+fdo at gmail.com Hardware: x86 (IA32)