similar to: "ld: bfd assertion fail" making eda.so on Linux (Redhat 6.0)

In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning behavior for a release or two, letting users opt-in to testing with the new -1/-2 tombstoning in the interim, before switching to the new tombstone by default (while still having the flag to switch back when users find surprise places that can't handle the new behavior). In long: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81784 and follow-on

I am using RGui version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14) for Windows.  When I enter the call   library(eda)   the following message ensues.   Error in library(eda) : there is no package called 'eda'   I thought that eda was a standard library for exploratory data analysis.  However I could not find it in the list of packages in the pull-down menu either.   Any assistance with finding this package would

Hello Leslie, I don't know quite what to say as I don't know precisely what your question is? If I am not being precise enough please can you put some explicit questions in? From what I can see in the output, here are some comments. >From your arc mapfiles it looks like that in the output both linker's have given the .text output section the correct base address given the

Full_Name: Frederic Schutz Version: 1.6.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (128.250.252.193) The subject says everything... This has already been proposed in June 2001 (cf http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/01a/2333.html), but no reply followed. I attach the patch that I used on my system to add this feature (including an updated help page), if it can help. Sorry, the two

Hi, I'm new to R. I'm trying to install R-0.64.0 on FreeBSD 2.2.8 (also new to FreeBSD). First, I run ./configure and then make. Make gives me an error message because it cannot find "eda.so" when trying to link it with line.o and smooth.o (see output below). I would appreciate it if somone could help me to fix this error. Thanks. Loren AFTER RUNNING CONFIGURE: R is now

Hello Leslie, The errors coming from the gnu assembler are due to the file being assembled in Arm state, to get rid of the errors you'll either need to put a .thumb directive in the file, or pass -mthumb to the assembler via arm-linux-gnu-gcc -Wa,-mthumb (I think). I'm not able to explain what you are seeing in your print out as it doesn't quite match the map file. Looking at your

>Пятница, 17 июля 2020, 19:42 +03:00 от David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:03 AM Fangrui Song < maskray at google.com > wrote: >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> On 2020-07-16, David Blaikie wrote: >> >In short: Perhaps we should switch lld to the bfd-style tombstoning >> >behavior for a release or

>On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alexey Lapshin <a.v.lapshin at mail.ru> wrote: >> >> >Пятница, 17 июля 2020, 19:42 +03:00 от David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: >> > >> >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:03 AM Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks for the write-up! >> >> >>

Hi All, In general I think we should adopt Dave's plan here. The number of consumers that can (and have) been caught off guard by this change is just too high. At the very least I think we should move this to opt in to the new tombstoning behavior by default and at most migrate to bfd's behavior for both the current release and in the current tree. If we want to make this sort of change

On 2020-07-24, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote: >Sounds good to me from a release perspective. I think we need more input from the triage of https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2291352 whether it is just .debug_line or .debug_* >On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:53 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev ><llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All,

>On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:32 AM Alexey Lapshin ><alapshin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >> >> >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alexey Lapshin <a.v.lapshin at mail.ru> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Пятница, 17 июля 2020, 19:42 +03:00 от David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: >> >> > >> >> >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:50 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:32 PM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Honestly even though I do understand the debug information I'm with you > and one reason why I'm pushing for the same reset that you are. There are a > lot of threads, it's fairly

>From my understanding the breakpad bug was also only related to .debug_line and has been fixed by https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/breakpad/breakpad/+/2317730 > a) .debug_ranges&.debug_loc => -2, .debug_line => 0, other .debug_* -> -1 > b) .debug_ranges&.debug_loc => -2, other .debug_* => 0 I am still of the opinion that we should just do a), not b).

Full_Name: Russell Price Version: 0.64.2 OS: Redhat 6.0 Submission from: (NULL) (128.171.242.1) When attempting to compile, I get the following error message: gcc -g -O2 -I../include -I../../src/include -c d1mach.c -o d1mach.o gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 make[2]: *** [d1mach.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/R-0.64.2/src/nmath' make[1]:

Targetting the raspberry pi, what triple/flags should I set? I tried triple: armv4t-unknown-linux-gnueabi and ld fails with: a.out uses VFP register arguments if i set hardfloat (using optdata.FloatABIType = FloatABI::Hard), ld fails with an assertion: 2.22 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:11477 what am I missing?

> I still think that we do bfd locs with a decent option to change for at least the current release and sources and then, once we're a little more certain we have everything that might want to parse dwarf (say by working with dwarf-discuss), we can change the default. Given what’s been found, I think Eric/Dave are correct, use bfd behavior by default with an option to do the new thing.

Created https://reviews.llvm.org/D84825 to be used for release/11.x I haven't seen a strong argument for changing other .debug_* but in any case I don't want to continue debating on this topic. * .debug_ranges & .debug_loc: -2 (lld<11: 0+addend) * .debug_*: 0 (lld<11: 0+addend, lld HEAD: -1) On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:47 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Leslie, I think we are going to need to know a bit more about the ELF ABI for what looks like the ArcCompact before we can help you. LLD's calculation of P (the place to be relocated) is as it is in the generic ELF specification. The Rel.Offset corresponds to the ELF r_offset field. This is covered by: "For a relocatable file, the value is the byte offset from the beginning of the

Hi I want to install eda library. Where can I download it? I use R version 2.1.0 on Linux. Thanks. Stephen. ----- Original Message ----- From: Luis Ridao Cruz <Luisr at frs.fo> Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:32 pm Subject: Re: [R] How to erase objects > ?rm > > > >>> <v.schlecht at arcor.de> 13/09/2005 12:08:55 >>> > > Hi, I admit that

Can we please just revert back to what we had before until the discussion about the desired behaviour and how to get there reaches a conclusion? In particular, I would like to merge that revert to the 11.x branch. At this point in the release process, I'm not keen on taking any patch that changes the behavior to something that hasn't been well tested from sitting in trunk for a while. On