similar to: as.numeric(<factor>) [Difference R/S]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "as.numeric(<factor>) [Difference R/S]"

1997 Dec 02
1
R-alpha: Re^2: data file names
[R-devel'ers: spill over from R-core .. -- MM] >>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: >>>>> Robert Gentleman writes: >> In preparing the next Windows release I want to make opening up >> system data files (and their documentation) more transparent. I >> would really like to adopt the
1997 Sep 02
1
R-alpha: Re: What are objects?
[I do think this discussion belongs to R-devel rather than anywhere else .. MM] >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: >>>>> Peter Dalgaard BSA writes: >> Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: KH>>> While trying to write documentation for data.class(), I came
1997 Nov 04
3
R-alpha: Re: Separation of Program & Doc; REQUIRING Perl5 [was: New Version]
[[Again I diverge to R-devel, I think we need more opinions here...]] >>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: >>>>> Ross Ihaka writes: >> I am beginning to get a bit more free time and I would like to get a >> "stable" version out as soon as possible. (This is of course so I can >> break
1998 Jan 07
0
Two more R/S differences
(Another discussion out of R-core, I think anyone in R-devel might have an opinion -- MM): >>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: >>>>> Martin Maechler writes: >>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: KH> * Bug or feature? R> NULL + NULL real(0) R>
1997 Nov 11
0
R-alpha: christmas wish (partial support for single)
The following is a re-post (after suggestion from martin) of a mail I sent to r-core this morning, maybe some of you are interested: >>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 1997 08:34:16 +0100, >>>>> Kurt Hornik (KH) wrote: KH> As Andreas & Fritz & I have recently, in attempts to port various pkgs KH> to R, come across the f2c problem again, I thought I'd ask ...
1999 Jan 29
1
Re: follow-up
From r-help-owner at stat.math.ethz.ch Fri Jan 29 13:40 NZD 1999 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:38:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Gregory R. Warnes" <warnes at biostat.washington.edu> To: royle at penguin.irm.r9.fws.gov cc: R comments <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> Subject: [R] Re: follow-up MIME-Version: 1.0 .RData files are *not* machine-independent! Thus, it doesn't mean
1997 Dec 16
0
R-beta: Win95/NT
> From rossetti at stat.unipg.it Sat Dec 13 09:53 NZD 1997 > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 21:47:58 +0100 > From: Andrea Rossetti <rossetti at stat.unipg.it> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: Robert Gentleman <rgentlem at stat.auckland.ac.nz>, r-devel <r-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch>, r-help <r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch> > Subject: Re: R-beta: new executable >
1997 Dec 05
0
R-beta: New R Version for Unix
Version 0.60 of R for Unix is now available. Release of this version has been delayed for a variety of reasons, but we hope that it will provide a good deal more stability and functionality than previous versions. However it should be regarded as of "alpha" quality for a short shakedown period. We would like user feedback to help us improve the quality of R. You can do this by
1997 Dec 05
0
R-beta: New R Version for Unix
Version 0.60 of R for Unix is now available. Release of this version has been delayed for a variety of reasons, but we hope that it will provide a good deal more stability and functionality than previous versions. However it should be regarded as of "alpha" quality for a short shakedown period. We would like user feedback to help us improve the quality of R. You can do this by
1997 Dec 03
2
R-alpha: Re^3: data file names
>>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: >>>>> Robert Gentleman writes: >>> In preparing the next Windows >>> release I want to make opening up system data files (and their >>> documentation) more transparent. I would really like to adopt >>> the convention that data files use
1997 Apr 30
1
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
Z. Todd Taylor writes: > I have a question/comment on this topic. If I understand what > I've read, R's lexical scoping rules are what require that all > of R's data be held in memory (as opposed to S's method of > storing each object on disk and reading it as often as > necessary). > My question is whether there will ever be a way around having to > store
1997 Apr 30
1
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
Z. Todd Taylor writes: > I have a question/comment on this topic. If I understand what > I've read, R's lexical scoping rules are what require that all > of R's data be held in memory (as opposed to S's method of > storing each object on disk and reading it as often as > necessary). > My question is whether there will ever be a way around having to > store
1997 Apr 29
0
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
Ross Ihaka <ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz> wrote: [ in response to discussions about S compatibility ] > Some things we almost certainly won't be changing. Scoping is one of > these (although I have to confess that I have made the pitch to Robert > that we should drop our scoping in favour of the S version - he > sensibly said "no"). I have a question/comment on
1999 Jan 19
2
locator(n=1) or (n=500) as S-plus ?
There's a non-compatibility between R and S-plus with the default argument of the locator() function. R has locator(n=1) S-plus has locator(n=500, type="n", noclick=F) S's default is ``better'' I think, insofar as it means in 99% of the cases ``user clicks <left> as many times as wanted and then clicks <right> to end'' Ross Ihaka and his grad
2012 Apr 27
1
multivariate xts merge question
Hi, I have an xts starting with a number of columns (currency pairs see below), then I add new ones which are derived from existing ones (like adding the moving average of a column) by merging the new columns one by one. These get the name of the column they are calculated from concatenated with ".1". All done by merge.xts, easy. Now, I have a function (procState below) which generates
2005 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] newbie llc build problem: BreakCriticalEdges.cpp:44: undefined reference to `llvm::LoopSimplifyID'
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Kurt Harriman wrote: > Looking into LLVM for a database query engine project... > > After downloading the latest source from CVS, it's my first time trying > to build LLVM. Following the "Getting Started" instructions, all went well > until gmake reported this error while trying to link llc: > AFAICT, 'LoopSimplifyID' does in fact
1998 Jan 05
0
as.numeric changes?
[another spill over from R-core concering the new behavior of as.numeric(.) for factors. - MM] >>>>> "Ross" == Ross Ihaka <ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes: Ross> Thomas Lumley writes: > On 27 Dec 1997, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote: > > Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes: > > > > > Now as.numeric() operates
2005 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] newbie llc build problem: BreakCriticalEdges.cpp:44: undefined reference to `llvm::LoopSimplifyID'
Hi, Looking into LLVM for a database query engine project... After downloading the latest source from CVS, it's my first time trying to build LLVM. Following the "Getting Started" instructions, all went well until gmake reported this error while trying to link llc: In function `(anonymous namespace)::BreakCriticalEdges::getAnalysisUsage(llvm::AnalysisUsage&) const':
1998 Mar 12
2
p./d./q./r: S compatibility and time-series software for R?
>>>>> "Martyn" == Martyn Plummer <plummer@iarc.fr> writes: Martyn> I will do this if you haven't been overrun with volunteers Martyn> already ;) No, you are the first to answer. Thank you very much in advance! --------------------- Martyn> Some time ago you asked about a basic time series Martyn> library for R. Did anything come
1997 Aug 22
0
R-alpha: Re: Extensions .R and .Rd (in base/funs/ and base/man/ )
This is propagated to R-devel in case anyone else has a comment on this : >>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: MM> On Aug. 14, MM> "Ross" == Ross Ihaka <ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes: Ross> Re the emacs stuff: MM> ... Ross> 2. Peter Dalgaard made the suggestion that we made R source