similar to: R-alpha: Re^3: data file names

Hi All I am having 2 very long character strings (550chars) and I want to put them as expressions together with c(). The problem is that I also get these double-quotes, as seen below in 'fct'. How can I remove these double-quotes? I tried as.name() but it did not work (because of size?). These are creating trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some

I applied the changes manually. This time, Xorg is actually starting... [ 16.862744] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 381 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:280 nouveau_bo_new+0x450/0x4d0 [nouveau] [ 16.873333] Modules linked in: nouveau i2c_algo_bit ttm tegra_drm gpio_keys drm_kms_helper drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks(P) host1x dwmac_dwc_qos_eth stmmac_platform stmmac ptp pps_core syscopyarea

Dear R-helpers, I am struggling with an optimization problem at the moment and decided to write the list looking for some help. I will use a very small example to explain what I would like to. Thanks in advance for your help. We would like to distribute resources from 4 warehouses to 3 destinations. The costs associated are as follows: Destination >From 1 2 3 Total

Hi Milu, byapply(df, 12, function(x) apply(x, 1, max)) You might also be interested in the matrixStats package. Best, Ista On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Miluji Sb <milujisb at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have monthly data in wide format, I am only providing data (at the bottom > of the email) for the first 24 columns but I have 2880 columns in total. > > I

I have a dataset that is basically structureless. Its dimension varies from row to row and sep(s) are a mixture of tab and semi colon (;) and example is HEADER1 HEADER2 HEADER3 HEADER3 A1 B1 C1 X11;X12;X13 A2 B2 C2 X21;X22;X23;X24;X25 A3 B3 C3 A4 B4 C4 X41;X42;X43 A5 B5 C5 X51 etc., say. Note that a blank

From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jun Lim via llvm-dev Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:05 AM Hi All, I found some cases where a spill of a live range in a block is reloaded only in one of its successors, and there is no reload in other paths through other successors. Since the spill is reloaded only in a certain path, it must be okay to sink such

The maximum over twelve columns is the maximum of the twelve maxima of each of the columns. single_col_max <- apply(x, 2, max) twelve_col_max <- apply( matrix(single_col_max, nrow = 12), 2, max ) ir. Thierry Onkelinx Statisticus / Statistician Vlaamse Overheid / Government of Flanders INSTITUUT VOOR NATUUR- EN BOSONDERZOEK / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST Team Biometrie

Hi All, I found some cases where a spill of a live range in a block is reloaded only in one of its successors, and there is no reload in other paths through other successors. Since the spill is reloaded only in a certain path, it must be okay to sink such spill close to its reloads. In the AArch64 code below, there is a spill(x2) in the entry, but this value is reloaded only in %bb.1, not in

> From: junbuml at codeaurora.org [mailto:junbuml at codeaurora.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:39 AM > > On 2018-02-22 11:14, gberry at codeaurora.org wrote: > > FROM: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] ON BEHALF OF > > Jun Lim via llvm-dev > > SENT: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:05 AM > > > > Hi All, > > > > I

I am new to more radical programming in R. I am trying to write a nested 'for' loop to produce output that takes subscripts like: for i taking values 1,2,3,4,5 and j taking values 1,2,3 I want to output for a computation using the combination values of i and j a value x like this; i j x 1 1 x11 1 2 x12 1 3 x13 2 1 x21 2 2 x22 2 3 x23 3 1 x31 3 2 x32

On 2018-02-22 11:14, gberry at codeaurora.org wrote: > FROM: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] ON BEHALF OF > Jun Lim via llvm-dev > SENT: Thursday, February 22, 2018 11:05 AM > > Hi All, > > I found some cases where a spill of a live range in a block is > reloaded only in one of its successors, and there is no reload in > other paths through other

My apologies for not including sessionInfo(), and I'm a bit angry at myself for that. Retrying in a fresh session of R, I get different results. More specifically, I get the expected result where accuracy is the same in the first and the last line. As I didn't include my sessionInfo() in my previous mail, I can't figure out why I now have a different result. So I'm positive

Dear All, I want to create one numeric variable from a factor one. here is a simple example: x1 x2 factor x11 x21 f1 x12 x22 f1 x13 x23 f2 x14 x24 f3 . . . . . . Suppose that the variable factor has 3 levels (f1,f2,f3). I want to add to this data frame a numeric variable x4 in (v1,v2,v3) such that x4=v1 if factor = f1, x4 = v2 if

Ista, et. al: efficiency? (Note: I needed to correct my previous post: do.call() is required for pmax() over the data frame) > x <- data.frame(matrix(runif(12e6), ncol=12)) > system.time(r1 <- do.call(pmax,x)) user system elapsed 0.049 0.000 0.049 > identical(r1,r2) [1] FALSE > system.time(r2 <- apply(x,1,max)) user system elapsed 2.162 0.045 2.207 ##

Thank you for your kind replies. Maybe I was not clear with my question (I apologize) or I did not understand... I would like to take the max for X0...X11 and X12...X24 in my dataset. When I use pmax with the function byapply as in byapply(df, 12, pmax) I get back a list which I cannot convert to a dataframe. Am I missing something? Thanks again! Sincerely, Milu

Dear all, I have monthly data in wide format, I am only providing data (at the bottom of the email) for the first 24 columns but I have 2880 columns in total. I would like to take max of every 12 columns. I have taken the mean of every 12 columns with the following code: byapply <- function(x, by, fun, ...) { # Create index list if (length(by) == 1) { nc <- ncol(x)

This is what I was looking for. Thank you everyone! Sincerely, Milu <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Mail priva di virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>

Hi.. i have an expression of the form: model1<-nls(y~beta1*(x1+(k1*x2)+(k1*k1*x3)+(k2*x4)+(k2*k1*x5)+(k2*k2*x6)+(k3*x7)+(k3*k4*x8)+(k3*k2*x9)+(k3*k3*x10)+ (k4*x11)+(k4*k1*x12)+(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+

It looks like OP uses a data.frame, so in order to use matrixStats (I'm the author) one would have to pay the price to coerce to a matrix before using matrixStats::rowMaxs(). However, if it is that the original data could equally well live in a matrix, then matrixStats should be computational efficient for this task. (I've seen cases where an original matrix was turned into a data.frame

Don't do this (sorry Thierry)! max() already does this -- see ?max > x <- data.frame(a =rnorm(10), b = rnorm(10)) > max(x) [1] 1.799644 > max(sapply(x,max)) [1] 1.799644 Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic