similar to: Testing process?

I'm a newbie and want to learn more about Dovecot. I can install it in a test bed but am not sure how to run it so it shows me what it's doing but i'm not actually mailing stuff. Is there a doc somewhere? Thanks! Leam -- Mind on a Mission <http://leamhall.blogspot.com/>

Hi, I have a problem with setting up quota usage tracking for domains. Problem is, that domain quota is always based on only one user in domain, the last one on whom behalf any operation was performed. To recreate this situation, one has only to perform: doveadm quota recalc -u USER on a user, and the domain quota takes the value of this user quota. Have anyone a clue what could cause this

Okay, newbie alert. We're having a problem with a linux (2.2.20 smp) webserver (apache) that is a samba 2.0.7-4) client. Oddly, both client and server are Linux. (I didn't set them up) There are 2 webservers that in theory are set up exactly the same. When a certain one of them goes live, it generates an error: smb_newconn failed to allocate new packet buffer max xmit 65535 The server

Hi there, How dovecot move the message to Spam without antispam plugin installed or sieve rule to move to this folder? I have no configuration to do this. My logs: Sep 10 12:12:44 mda02 dovecot: imap(my.user at mydomain.com): Warning: Inotify instance limit for user 5000 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances Sep 10 12:12:45 mda02 dovecot: imap(my.user

Dear All, About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore, I am extending that email to this community; where there is a larger community. Some things that we will like to achieve are as follows: SSH: disable root

Did this one ever get resolved? I'm having the same issue with a different card set. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2008-January/000192.html Leam

Hey all, not sure if this was operator error or what. I'm running a KVM host on updated CentOS 6. The guest is built from the CentOS 6.9 dvd1 with just @base and @core package groups. When I went to install mysql it failed due to incompatibilities with the libcc versions. Updated just glibc and glibc-common and then installed mysql. Shortly there after it started to freeze and lost

I managed to get Asterisk working with my PBX using T1, now I am moving on to trying to make PRI work. I have my zaptel.conf and zapata.conf configured as follows: Zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24 loadzone=us defaultzone=us Zapata.conf: [channels] transfer=yes immediate=yes callprogress=yes language=en context=default switchtype=national signalling=pri_net group=1

On 22 April 2015 at 20:49, Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing > > list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of > > the members of the community who are also interested in this.

Any ideas? Sangoma support is closed for the evening. I have the latest Sangoma drivers and Asterisk 1.4 everything installed. When I fire up asterisk, I keep getting "Primary D-Channel on span 1 up" repeated over and over. The B channels never come up. There are no errors in any of the logs, zttool, or the wanpipe tools. Intense pri debug output: < Unnumbered frame: < SAPI:

Hi I have a small ISDN PABX , (BRI) at home - Siemens Gigaset 4175 which has cordless DECT extensions. I have set up asterisk on FC3 with two HFC cards and I am using the latest bristuff. I am trying to use * between my ISDN line and my PABX. One card is in TE mode and can receive and make calls OK. I can make and receive external calls to a SIP phone. I cannot get the other card to talk to my

I've got a couple of PRIs coming in from a SUMA 4 switch with some 800 numbers routed through it. When the calls come in, I get the following message on the console and the call never makes it through: (800 number is fake) Extension '8005551212' in context 'nonauthenticated' from '232102749585' does not exist. Rejecting the call on span 4, channel 1. I do have the

Hi, I'm pulling my hair out, cause cannot connect to EuroISDN BRI in Italy with octobri card from Beronet. I use bristuff and have following zaptel.conf... # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg # # # First come the span definitions, in the format # span=<span num>,<timing>,<line build out (LBO)>,<framing>,<coding>[,yellow] # # The timing

Hi, I have the following happen to me after the restart of one of my servers: out of my 3 PRIs (all configured with the same technical settings), the last one isn't coming back. It's underutilized (chances it didn't get a call since my reboot), if it makes a difference . The PRI goes from provisioned to unprovisioned, and I get this regularly: [Jun 22 09:03:48]

Ok Guys, I've done a tonne of hunting around on this problem, but can't find much help. I'm running: asterisk 1.4.19.1 libpri 1.4.3 and zaptel 1.4.9.2 which I believe has been modified by RedFone to add the ztd-ethmf module. My interface is a RedFone foneBridge2 4 Span; and I'm connecting to a BT E1 PRI / ISDN30e with 15 lines on span 1, and a legacy Panasonic PBX on span 4. Upon

Hi Guys, Running the following with a Sangoma A101D PRI card: *Asterisk 1.4.21.2* *LibPRI version: 1.4.10* No inbound or outbound calls can be made. In fact Asterisk CLI doesn't show any activity. Problem goes away on restart of the system or maybe asterisk. I see post about upgrading Libpri to 1.4.10.2 and then I see posts that even that didn't work. Anyone can weigh in this please?

Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.... Asterisk 1.0.6 Zaptel 1.0.6 Libpri 1.0.6, 1 Digium E100P card installed Panasonic TDA200 firmware v2.0.6 E1 Card Firmware 1.0.2 System is located in Australia, so as technologies go, I believe it is twist on the euro standard for the E1 signalling. Here is the situation. The TDA E1 card is set in cross over mode and I am using a functional

Hi all, Last night I went to replace an Asterisk 1.4 + mISDN + b410p box with Asterisk 1.6.2 and DAHDI BRI - to no avail. I had two servers so copied network setting etc from the working one, moved the card across, ran dahdi_genconf etc and it didn't work. Here's the console output with notices disabled: lucas*CLI> pri intense debug span 1 Enabled debugging on span 1 [Dec 16

Hello- I have a system with one D410P and one B200P (both OpenVox). All is well with the D410P, inbound and outbound, and I can initiate calls on the B200P BRI span, but there may be something wrong with my inbound BRI setup: there is no indication of an inbound call when I dial in to it from the PSTN. When I run "pri intense debug" and make a call to the BRI span, I can see a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello List, since some days i run into the problem that one span on a TE407P is not comming up correctly. With intense debug on that span i get: < [ 02 01 7f ] < Unnumbered frame: < SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 < TEI: 000 EA: 1 < M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] < 0 bytes of data