similar to: Does samba-3.6.7's libsmbclient supports SMB2 protocol?

Hi, Got segmentation fault with the follwoing stacktrace while running "examples/libsmbclient/testacl13.c". #0 0x00000033a866f200 in strlen () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x00000033a8642c51 in vfprintf () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x00000033a8661bb4 in vsnprintf () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #3 0x00000033a86481a1 in snprintf () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #4 0x00002aaaaaaebf36

(gdb) bt #0 0x00000033a86bcc36 in select () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x00002aaaaae5c108 in sys_select () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 #2 0x00002aaaaae64027 in event_loop_once () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 #3 0x00002aaaaae8556b in cli_pull () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 #4 0x00002aaaaae85626 in cli_read () from /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0 #5 0x00002aaaaae0866a in SMBC_read_ctx

Hi, I'm using samba 3.2.6 and getting the following error whille calling? smbc_getxattr(). cli_lsa_lookup_sids_noalloc(): out of memory Here is the relavent code snippet of the function cli_lsa_lookup_sids_noalloc()... if (dom_idx != 0xffffffff) { ??????????????????????? dom_name = ref_domains->domains[dom_idx].name.string; ??????????????????????? name =

Hi, I need to extract the following attributes of a file in Windows share using samba. /* FileAttributesField */ #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY???????? 0x001L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN?????????? 0x002L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_SYSTEM?????????? 0x004L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY??????? 0x010L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE????????? 0x020L #define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL?????????? 0x080L

Hi All: I am building the torture/smbtorture for samba-4.0.0alpha17. After build, I am running the test in another environment. I not only need to copy the binary smbtorture, I also need to copy the shared libraries. This is HUGE inconvenient for us. Could somebody tell me how to build the binary using static linked libraries? Thanks very much Peixing libpthread.so.0 =>

Hi, What determines the protocol version that libsmbclient uses? Changing min and max protocol version in the client smb.conf seems to have no effect. I'm chasing up the performance issues I posted about earlier which may be caused by my Linux clients defaulting to SMB1 (via gvfsd-smb) while Windows happily negotiates SMB2 with the servers. If I restrict the servers to SMB2, gvfs can't

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hello, I use libsmbclient from Python, using pysmbc: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pysmbc (its a very thin wrapper around libsmbclient). When setting "client max protocol" in smb.conf to SMB2 (or higher), libsmbclient then switches to SMB2 if the server supports it. Performance of opendir() remains much the same, but calling stat() is about 40 times slower when using SMB2. Time taken

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

Hello, We are running some legacy software that instructs us to, via Windows registry settings, disable all oplocks and SMB2 entirely on each Windows workstation that connects to the Samba share where the software is hosted. The software maintainers give dire warners of corruption, etc., if oplocks (and SMB2) are left enabled. We?ve run this software off of a Samba share for 20 years and have

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

Hello, i have a Samba Server running on CentOS 5.6 with samba package 3.5.8 from SerNet. Shares can accessed until I enable max protocol = smb2, after that no access is possible. In the samba logfiles such an access is logged with: Failed to parse NTLMSSP packet, could not extract NTLMSSP command Followed by a dump_data. Any ideas? Cheers, Daniel

Hello, I'm trying to use the "notify" API of libsmbclient, testing against a Samba AD DC. The function is returning with errno=22 (mapped from NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH), and I'm getting the following error message: smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_11] server[dc1.example.com] It looks like libsmbclient is, for some reason, using SMB1 but needs to be

Hallo First i try to install samba 3.5.21 on RHEL 6.4 Im getting the message: Loaded plugins: kabi, product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, security, subscription-manager This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register. This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or RHN Satellite. Loading support for Red Hat kernel ABI

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

snip from make.log: Compiling libsmb/libsmbclient.c with -KPIC "libsmb/libsmbclient.c", line 3249: warning: argument #3 is incompatible with prototype: prototype: pointer to char : "libsmb/libsmbclient.c", line 1167 argument : pointer to const char "libsmb/libsmbclient.c", line 3843: warning: argument #5 is incompatible with prototype:

Building Samba 4.1.4 on Solaris 10 with command line: CC=gcc LDFLAGS='-R /opt/local/samba/lib:/opt/local/samba/lib/private' \ ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/samba make fails linking 'default/examples/libsmbclient/teststatvfs': [3505/3811] Linking default/examples/libsmbclient/teststatvfs ld: warning: symbol 'dyn_LIBDIR' has differing sizes: (file

Our smbclient 3.6.5 and smbclient 4.0.7 does not work with SMB2/SMB3, which is a security concern for us. Is there a patch or a workaround that can be done for those releases? I've read that Apple made changes in Maverick 10.9, which now causes failures, but am hoping that something was done to support the MAC OS 10.9 releases. Regards, Mike Tompkins