Displaying 20 results from an estimated 130 matches similar to: "deliver doesn't update cache index with mbox"
2014 Feb 12
1
Panic on one specific user
dovecot: imap(john at example.com): Error: /usr/local/virtual/john at example.com/dovecot.index: modseq_hdr.log_offset too large
dovecot: imap(john at example.com): Error: /usr/local/virtual/john at example.com/dovecot.index: modseq_hdr.log_offset too large
dovecot: imap(john at example.com): Panic: file mail-transaction-log-file.c: line 1148 (mail_transaction_log_file_get_highest_modseq_at):
2017 Jun 14
1
Joining a Windows Server 2008 / 2008 R2 DC to a Samba AD - ISSUE - The RPC server is unavailable
Hi Rowland,
*>> How did you configure Samba ?*
atca13 [/opt/samba/bin]# ./samba --show-build
Samba version: 4.5.0-HPE CIFS SERVER 4.5.0.0
Build environment:
Build host: HP-UX atca7 B.11.31 U ia64 3395706695 unlimited-user license
Paths:
BINDIR: /opt/samba/bin
SBINDIR: /opt/samba/bin
CONFIGFILE: /etc/opt/samba/smb.conf
NCALRPCDIR: /var/opt/samba/run/ncalrpc
LOGFILEBASE:
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I am staring constantly at the same logs, this is what I get from
dovecot[1]. Sendmail[2] is sending with test at svr1 maybe this overrides
lmtp proxying? This is a test with a special-userdb passwd-file also
having host=svr2
[1]
Dec 16 16:30:16 svr1 dovecot: lmtp(16466): Debug: none: root=, index=,
indexpvt=, control=, inbox=, alt=
Dec 16 16:30:16 svr1 dovecot: lmtp(16466): Connect from
2019 Dec 17
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki, you have some ingenious remark that could help?
-----Original Message-----
To: aki.tuomi; dovecot
Subject: RE: Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I am staring constantly at the same logs, this is what I get from
dovecot[1]. Sendmail[2] is sending with test at svr1 maybe this overrides
lmtp proxying? This is a test with a special-userdb passwd-file also
having host=svr2
[1]
Dec
2017 Sep 15
1
Calculating Weeks Since Last Event
Hi,
I have an input data
> dput (input)
structure(list(ScanDate = structure(c(16433, 16440, 16447, 16454,
16461, 16468, 16475, 16482, 16489, 16496, 16503, 16510, 16517,
16524, 16531, 16538, 16545, 16552, 16559, 16566, 16573, 16580,
16587, 16594, 16601, 16608, 16615, 16622), class = "Date"), OnPromotion =
c(0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,
0, 0, 1,
2009 Aug 12
0
Problem with Linux x86_64 RODBC and Netezza (PR#13889)
Full_Name: Kenneth Cater
Version: 2.9.1
OS: Linux x86_64
Submission from: (NULL) (171.159.192.10)
It appears that R closes my connection to the Netezza device before the Netezza
has completed its return of data, below are two files clean_test.log which
tracks the systems call made when running the test.r file, and clean_test.out
which is the output generated when test.r is executed. Notice how
2005 Sep 13
1
what does this mean: Warning: Error in custom flags file / Corrupted Indexes
Hi everyone:
I am seeing a whole LOT of these messages in my dovecot logfile:
imap(rickt): Sep 12 17:14:03 Warning: Error in custom flags file /
home/rickt/mail/.imap/TRASH/.customflags: Duplicated ID 0
imap(rickt): Sep 12 17:14:03 Warning: Error in custom flags file /
home/rickt/mail/.imap/TRASH/.customflags: Duplicated ID 1
and also these:
imap(mbwnews): Sep 12 17:10:16 Error: Corrupted
2008 Nov 28
2
Sendmail - STARTTLS not appear on one client
Hi,
I have Sendmail configured to use STARTTLS for authentication. On all
internet connections and computers (that I have tested) works
connection over encrypted SMTP flawlessly. Today I was setting up mail
client on PC of my customer and standardily checked boxes, that I want
to use SSL for POP3 and SMTP. Next I wanted to check configuration (by
sending email from this mailbox to this mailbox)
2007 Sep 13
1
Collapsing data frame; aggregate() or better function?
Hello r-help,
I am trying to collapse or aggregate 'some' of a data frame. A very
simplified version of my data frame looks like:
> tester
trip set num sex lfs1 lfs2
1 313 15 5 M 2 3
2 313 15 3 F 1 2
3 313 17 1 M 0 1
4 313 17 2 F 1 1
5 313 17 1 U 1 0
And I want to omit sex from the picture and just get an addition of num,
2010 Jun 29
0
T.38 Peer Negotiation Fails
Asterisk 1.4.32 (Also 1.4.26, 1.4.33)
Broadvox ITSP (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
Linksys 2102 (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy)
Both peers :
canreinvite=yes
t38pt_udptl = yes
I'm having some trouble getting a T.38 fax call established with
Broadvox. During negotiation, Asterisk sends a SIP re-invite (T38
switchover) to Broadvox with the Asterisk server's IP address in the
Connection Information (c) instead of
2003 Jul 16
0
Indexes again
A bit quiet here, so here's some more thoughts about indexes. Even
though I was thinking only how to make them usable with NFS (I wrote it
to doc/nfs.txt), it then occured to me that exactly the same tricks
would help with local filesystem indexes as well. Especially the
lockless reading would help with lock contention issues I was worrying
about earlier with shared mailboxes.
Also it occured
2003 Apr 30
1
Corrupted index
Hi-
Still getting a bunch of these:
Apr 30 13:45:23 mercury mem[11056]: pop3(user1): Corrupted index file
/users/78/user1/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index: used_file_size larger than
real file size (4032 vs 1608)
and the occasional:
Apr 30 13:08:53 mercury mem[13507]: pop3(user2): Corrupted index file
(in-memory index for /users/e0/user2/Maildir): Filename mismatch for
UID 1:
2003 Sep 14
1
child 9436 (pop3) killed with signal 11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Suddenly since this afternoon the following happens:
Sep 14 18:16:55 UnseenUniversity pop3-login: Login: gunter [127.0.0.1]
Sep 14 18:16:55 UnseenUniversity pop3(gunter): Corrupted index data file /
home/gunter/Mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.data: Field 1 size points outside
file (205408 / 205376) for record 4662
Sep 14 18:16:55 UnseenUniversity
2006 Mar 08
2
Survival Plots by Strata
All,
I am struggling to create a survival plot using LTRC data for each year
of a 10 year period.
I have a set of individuals (birds) where 'entry' is the day of the
year (1-365) they are released (let out of pens) into the wild (2 year
data snip below). 'Entry' (e.g., day of year the first bird is
released for each year) is highly variable, ranging from 48 to >250.
When I
2004 Feb 29
3
index file corruption
Hi,
I'm using Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10p0) on OpenBSD-3.4 for few weeks now.
When i connect to my IMAP account the connection is often closed by
dovecot when i try to delete mails.
I can see messages like this in log:
Feb 29 18:47:00 po imap(mat at reynerie.org): Corrupted binary tree file
/home/mat/Maildir//.INBOX/.imap.index.tree: used_file_size larger than
real file size (1772 vs 1556)
2005 Apr 11
1
Index(?) problem under OpenBSD
Hi,
My apologies if this has been mentioned before, I haven't pulled up a
google search yet. I run Dovecot from the package under OpenBSD 3.6
(dovecot-0.99.10.8).
The problem I have is that occasionally dovecot corrupts an index file
(I think), which causes the process to gradually creep up in usage,
until it hits 99%, where it stays, without quitting. If I then fire up
my mail client
2004 Aug 31
2
corrupted .imap.index.log
Hi, I'm using version 0.99.10.8 on debian 2.4.26 and am getting this
problem, can someone please shed some light over this?
Aug 31 13:58:58 xxx imap(someone): file_wait_lock() failed with modify
log file /var/mail/someone_new/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index.log: Resource
temporarily unavailable
and then:
Aug 31 14:00:58 xxx imap(someone): Couldn't lock modify log file
2004 Jul 04
1
1.0-test25 with new cache file code
http://dovecot.org/test/
Pretty much the only change since test24 is a redesign of how cache
file writing works. Reading works as before - without locks.
Before (in 1.0-tests, 0.99 was worse) we used to just try to lock it.
If it failed, we just didn't update cache. If it didn't fail, the lock
could have been kept a long time. For example if a user was downloading
a 10MB mail, the
2008 May 02
2
used_file_size too large
Hi.
Just got this error (1.1.rc4), is it something to worry about?
Corrupted index cache file /.../Maildir/.Sent/dovecot.index.cache:
used_file_size too large
This is a shared mailbox with concurrent access. In general, can that
usage pattern mess up the index? I am guessing "no", which is why I worry
slightly about the warning.
Cheers,
Anders.
2005 Jul 02
1
Sipura SPA2000 behind NAT
Hi, I've one Sipura SPA2000 at home behind a linuxbox with two network
adapters (eth0 for WAN and eth1 for LAN) doing NAT/DHCP:
___________ HOME _______________ ____OFFICE ____
SPA2000 <---> Linux Box <--> Asterisk Box
192.168.0.253 192.168.0.1 eth1 200.93.xxx.a
200.93.xxx.b eth0
My problem is when I try to call to any trunk or extention