similar to: CTDB and IPv6

Hello, We are using CTDB / Samba to serve a number of windows users, at this point around 1200. We have a 4 node CTDB setup. CTDB version - ctdb-1.0.114.7-1 Samba Version - sernet-samba-4.1.16-10 In recent months we've seen a big problem when 1 of the CTDB nodes is stopped or disconnected either manually or resulting from a problem. On some occasions, all other nodes get banned if a node

Hi, I had the problem that 'ipconfig' as DHCP client in Debian-squeeze could not get DHCP Offer reply from the built-in DHCP server of the cheap route that I have. The name of the router is 'MegaBitGear TE4571E' which I got at contract of ADSL Internet access service in 2009. The router is not too old and can reply to other DHCP clients like ISC-dhclient, WindowsXP and Vista.

Can anyone help with some pointers to debug a problem with Samba and CTDB with smbstatus traversing the connections tdb? I've got a new two node cluster with Samba and CTDB on AIX. If I run smbstatus when the server has much user activity it hangs and the node it was run on gets banned. I see the following in the ctdb log: 2014/10/29 11:12:45.374580 [3932342]:

Hi, I?ve setup a simple ctdb cluster. Actually copied the config file from an existing system. Thats what happens: Node 1, alone Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 10.0.0.1 OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 10.0.0.2 DISCONNECTED|UNHEALTHY|INACTIVE Generation:1369816268 Size:1 hash:0 lmaster:0 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:0 Node1, after start of ctdb on Node 2 Number of nodes:2 pnn:0

Hello, I'm receiving the following warning when building S4rc5 on CentOS 6.3. I have installed the ctdb and ctdb-devel (1.0.114.3 ) packages included with CentOS. The only thing I could find on Google is someone with the same problem around a year ago, but that went unanswered. Thanks for any help! building without cluster support: CHECK_SRVIDS control missing

Hi everybody, I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come back and remains in state "UNHEALTHY". I can find that in the syslog: May 16 11:25:40 ctdb-lbn1 ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445 May 16

Hi Benedikt, On Thu, 16 May 2019 10:32:51 +0200, Benedikt Kaleß via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version > 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version > 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. > > After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come > back and remains in state

Hello, I've got a two node CTDB/Samba cluster that I'm having trouble with trying to add back a node after having to do an OS reload on it. The servers are running CTDB 2.5.1 and Samba 4.1.4 on AIX 7.1 TL2. The Samba CTDB databases and Samba service work fine from the node that was not reloaded. The rebuilt node is failing to re-add itself to the cluster. I'm looking for

Hello I find the following email form internet, and I have the same problem, can you share your information about this issue? [Samba] ctdb issue: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948 has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store Nate Hardt nate at scalecomputing.com