similar to: "idmap backend = ad" saga continues

Tried single quotes on Domain Admins in the pam.d file as well as a backslash on the space with no effect. I've found several references that just say "no spaces in group names." Is there really no way to do this? Also, most references I find to using these lines in pam.d say that "sufficient" should work, but I'm finding that users in the named group can then log in

Hello All, I'm trying to set up linux ssh/shell authentication on a CentOS_6.2 server running smbd version 3.5.10-114 using winbind/smb/pam. We've done this successfully using the tdb backend but wanted users to get the same UID/GID on every machine. Switched to rid for the backend but users still got a foreign number for UID and their default group was always Domain Users. So I'm

Hello All. Been trying without avail to make idmap work with my AD so I can get "real" UID/GID for SSH logins on a CentOS_6 box. Have heard from several sources that idmap has seen some serious changes since 3.5 and decided to roll back from the "stock" 3.5 that comes with CentOS_6 to 3.4.8. I'd like to see if it has the same problems. Installed a clean build of

Shorewall 1.4.7c is now available and continues the saga with "<zone>_frwd" chains. My apologies for this mess.... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. Actually, I *HAD* a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM :-) .... After a read of the virt-install man page, I concluded that I could lose the current VM (but *NOT* its HDD image) & recreate it fairly easily w/ the right combo of arguments to virt-install. The proceedings: [root at Q6600:/etc, Mon Aug 15, 04:30 PM] 1163 # virsh list

Hello all, I seem to be in a bit of a bind. Below is the email which I sent to the list a while back. I wrote the vast majority of my CD collection to Flac and checked them with the Flac test (the -t option of Flac), they played fine and all seemed wonderful. Sadly life is no longer roses and chocolates. Now as I come to rip the whole lot to Vorbis files, Oggenc is spewing an error that the

At 01:42 AM 8/13/2005, you wrote: > > It would actually be easier to rerip all your CDs using EAC. I rip to > > ogg vorbis with EAC and it comes out fine. I can give you a website URL > > that will give you the info on how to setup EAC to use ogg vorbis. And I > > use -q 8 so they sound good. > >Thanks for the suggestion, Jon, but I would rather not re-rip them. I

Please see my post from 24 hours ago for the background on my efforts to get Samba to run. I received instructions to modify include/includes.h to change the #include <compat.h> to #include <compat_ap.h>. Needless to say, this solved nothing other than a bunch of harmless warnings. It also caused a different warning to spew forth eternally from gcc, and more importantly, it

Hi, i don't know a lot about linux. But i wanted to play Ether Saga Online... Anyways, When i ran Launcher.exe Code: wine Launcher.exe

Hello everyone, I'm a big fan of Lost Saga but despite we can finally use the launcher and update the game, it'll still not start because of X-trap (like Rusty Hearts). I read that Wine's developers doesn't want to solve the problem because of privacies problems, but personally I don't care that much [Wink] If they want to take informations about my computer (and do we know

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC-14 host. I was originally using the stock NAT networking on the guest, which could access the host, but nothing else on the network. I eventually found some links on how to setup routed networking on the guest using a specifically setup bridge. I followed the example a bit too closely, bridging my eth0 interface, which is the one I

Attached is the 5th and final patch of the beginning of COFF support for MC. It simply makes the X86 backend use it on Win32 targets and tests it. - Michael Spencer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ms-coff-patch-5.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 23435 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On 26 July 2010 04:35, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is the 5th and final patch of the beginning of COFF support > for MC. It simply makes the X86 backend use it on Win32 targets and > tests it. > > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- case Triple::Win32: + case Triple::Cygwin: + case Triple::MinGW32: return

On 26 July 2010 18:08, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> > wrote: > > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- > > case Triple::Win32: > > + case Triple::Cygwin: > > + case Triple::MinGW32: > > return new

We'll ignore that the group name for KDE changed, and so, since we had it on the same line as X, neither was installed. However, more of an annoyance: to get nfs working, I had to install: pam-krb5 ncsd then fix /etc/init.d/autofs (when I did a service restart, it told me automount was running, and did not stop it), then after some research, found I had to manually start rpcbind, *then*

Oh Wise Ones, For the past two days, I have contested with the Samba documentation and other sources of lore in a vain attempt to achieve Samba/LDAP integration. My test system is running RedHat 9 with updates applied, along with OpenLDAP & OpenSSL from redhat-rawhide, and the Samba 3.0.1pre1 RPM from the Samba website. A couple of questions: The HOWTOs instruct one to slapadd a file

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- >    case Triple::Win32: > +  case Triple::Cygwin: > +  case Triple::MinGW32: >      return new WindowsX86AsmBackend (T); > Aaron Can someone test this on those platforms? That change would effect quite a few people. -

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I tried setting these to false, but the resulting executable (made >>> with link.exe) crashed. I

Ben Love had this to say: > * Mike Leone wrote on [2010-03-27 22:02:38 -0400]: >> I tried to log on as "DACRIB+administrator" at the physical console. I >> was prompted twice for my password (dunno if that's because my password >> has a "!" in it or not). Then it starts to login. I see the motd. I see >> it say that it was trying to create a

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Daniel somehow replied to one of my previous commits on llvm-commits >>> instead of this thread.