similar to: Tangential Issue: idmap backend = ad and Active Directory 2008R2

Hello All, I'm trying to set up linux ssh/shell authentication on a CentOS_6.2 server running smbd version 3.5.10-114 using winbind/smb/pam. We've done this successfully using the tdb backend but wanted users to get the same UID/GID on every machine. Switched to rid for the backend but users still got a foreign number for UID and their default group was always Domain Users. So I'm

Hi, I am setting up ctdb samba, and have hit a brick wall trying to solve the following issue. 1. getent does not retrieve the list of domain users or groups (wbinfo works fine) I'm not sure what I'm missing but I've almost spent the whole day trying to resolve this one and haven't made any progress :-( Any help or suggestions are appreciated My configuration is

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

Hello All, Been a week or three since I could return to this puzzle but I've found some time and thought I'd refresh on my progress so far. I'm trying to set up a CentOS_6.2 box running samba 3.5.10-116 to authenticate against a Windows 2008R2 AD for SSH logins. We've previously done this using winbind and local account on each machine matching AD accounts but I'd like to do

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hello, does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ? It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11). Here my share definition: [shared] comment = <comment> path = <path> available = yes

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

Hi list, I have gone through several mailing list archives, googled, tested several options, but we cannot figure out how we fix our problem. NIS provides the uid and gid in Linux AD provides the passwords storage is provided by GPFS via samba to windows users OS: RedHat 5.5 x86_64 Samba: 3.4.2 and/or 3.5.2 We are able to mount the home directories without any problems, we can

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Hello, We're trying to set up a GPFS system with Samba running on top with CTDB managing it. I have snapshots set up to be accessible in every directory as the invisible directory .snap The snapshots are in the following format: /usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmcrsnapshot 1MB `TZ=GMT date + at GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S` ?and look like this from the UNIX level:

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Hi Samba Users, I'm in the process of building a Samba4 CTDB /GPFS Cluster joined as a member server to AD that also supports ACL's . It has taken some time but almost everything is working now :) . My one outstanding issue is editing files using Excel 2007 on Windows 7 results in a 'Document not saved' error. I believe this is an issue with the SMB2 protocol as I can edit the same

Hi, I am using samba samba3-3.3.4-39, with ctdb ctdb-1.0-69.x86_64, gpfs gpfs-3.2.1 on centos 5.3 x86_64. My problem is that from samba share I can't read file permissions and file ownership, although I'm in "domain admins" group, which has full permissions(rwx) via inherited acl (not user or group ownership). If I'm in a group that owns the file, I can read the permissions,

Hi All, I'm having a frustrating time exporting a GPFS Independent Writer AFM fileset through Samba. Native GPFS directories exported through Samba seem to work properly, but when creating an export which points to an AFM IW fileset, I get "Access Denied" errors when trying to create files from an SMB client and even more unusual "Failed to enumerate objects in the container:

Hi All, Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP backend for Winbind: RID vs. AD or tag Winbind to a primary CTDB node and point other nodes to authenticate from AD via proxy primary CTDB node? /etc/sysconfig/ctdb on all nodes is as follows:

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

**Unmatched Entries** gdm[5342]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): error retrieving information about user gdm[5342]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): error retrieving information about user gdm[5342]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): error retrieving information about user 9 gdm[5342]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): error retrieving information about user gdm[5342]: pam_succeed_if(gdm:auth): error retrieving

passwd: Authentication token manipulation error smbpasswd: machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : Wrong Password best regards [FACILITY/btombul at samba ~]$ passwd Changing password for user FACILITY/btombul. Changing password for FACILITY/btombul (current) NT password: New password: Retype new password: passwd: Authentication token manipulation error [FACILITY/btombul at

Hi, I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/). When a file is updated by SMB clients(followed by file-close), other SMB clients can see and modify the file. But when a NFS client (same user) updates the same file(followed by file-close), only one SMB server can see the updates. The clients mounting

Hello, I am using Dovecot ver.1.0.7 on an x86 server with RedHat Linux Enterprise 5 and the following configuration: # 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf protocols: pop3 login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login mail_location: mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_executable: /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir: /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3