similar to: Secondary DNS - samba 4 domain

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

Alright, I'm taking the plunge: We're switching our three AD DCs from Samba internal to BIND_DLZ back end. I needed a version of BIND with DLZ, as it appears support for that is not so ubiquitous. I went here first: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_BIND_DLZ_backend_with_secured_/_signed_DNS_updates We use Ubuntu 14.04 here, and the Debian/Ubuntu instructions fail on apt-get

Hai Guys, Just a general notification. Currently if you run samba 4.x-4.8 and upgraded to 4.9.0-4.9.4 on bind9 dns. Your missing the new folders. So even when your already running on bind9_dlz, follow these steps, and prevent possible problems in future. # create the missing folder. mkdir -p /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns # use samba_upgradedns to move the files and folder and fixes

I am trying to setup samba to use the bind9 backend, but a folder is missing in Samba, according to the WIKI page. This seems to be consistent, as there are several files and folders that are not where they should be, according to the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End That page says there should be a folder at /usr/local/samba/bind-dns, but it's not there. I've

hello our AD domain is hosted by two samba AD domain controllers version 4.12.6 - replication between controllers is fine, no problems. - no schema errors. - no database errors, all fine. we use this samba DCs with bind with DLZ backend (bind-9.11.13-6.el8_2.1.x86_64) to manage internal DNS zones. bind/DLZ setup is deployed completely same way on both DC1 and DC2 (mostly followed samba wiki

Hello, I actually have 3 principal DCs Samba version : 4.6.4 / Redhat7 All 3 DCs work with BIND9_DLZ as dns backend. Today I added a new DC to my domain assignd to a site i previously created with: samba-tool domain join mydomain.lan DC -U administrator --realm=MYDOMAIN.LAN -W mydomain --site=MYSITE* *Then I tried to migrate the dns backend of this fresh new DC to bind DLZ (as i did for

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:45:39 +1200 > Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > > > It looks like the original intention in our code was to be able to > > add/modify records with the "." zone. Trying it, there seems to be > > other issues with using

It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4 /usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4 We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3 and still using internal dns. Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have to migrate to bind9. On Mon, Jul 30, 2018

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

Hi all, I would like to be able to rely on samba given tools to manage my DNS entries but until now, I failed. >From what I have understood there is one and only one tool responsible to update DNS: samba_dnsupdate. Is that previous affirmation true? I had issue with DNS backend set to internal DNS server: samba_dnsupdate was almost never working. So I switched to Bind-DLZ as advised here

Hi all, We've recently migrated from a separate DNS server that was dynamically updated with BIND's update-policy, using a manually generated tkey-gssapi-keytab (plus a second server functioning as an ordinary slave to the first), to BIND9_DLZ. The setup predated Samba's AD DC support and BIND's DLZ support, and was originally established because even though we needed AD, we were

> > You are using Bind9 with flatfiles, this is NOT recommended. > If you are using the standard Ubuntu Bind9 package, you should be using > BIND9_DLZ and this stores the dns info in AD. > How did you provision the DC, was it with 'BIND9_FLATFILE' or > 'BIND9_DLZ' ? > If it was the later, just remove the 'wie' zone and its reverse zone > from the

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 19:19:21 +1000 Amitay Isaacs via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Let me try to clear some confusion. > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Torsten Kurbad via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Samba's bind-dlz module does not export root hints to BIND named. So > the error you are seeing is an issue with your

Hello Everyone, I am used to messing with bind zones directly. With samba 4, I cannot do that. Is the following the correct way to add a TXT record for SPF to the zone using samba-tool? /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add s4server.example.org example.org example.org TXT "v=spf1 mx -all" I am not sure it is because it is showing up with dig as "v=spf1" "mx"

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

On 02/12/15 11:59, mathias dufresne wrote: > Rowland, > > What did you request as DNS? Samba + Bind + DLZ ? > If yes, the fact your two DNS are replying "I am SOA" is a feature from > Bind9 or from DLZ patch. Yes, I use bind9 with the dlz backend. > > That's important as a standard Samba AD designed without Bind is using LDAP > defined entry for SOA. Asking

On 02/12/15 10:31, mj wrote: >> I can find on the internet multiple instances of 'every DC running dns >> should have a SOA record', but I cannot find any concrete examples of an >> ldif that shows this. Does each DC have a separate SOA record in AD, or >> is there just one SOA record and the DC just claims to be the SOA, or is >> there just one SOA record

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file