similar to: Samba4 DNS - Adding CNAME

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

Samba 4.0.0 I am running all of these commands from the PDC DC1. /etc/resolv.conf domain mydomain.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 smb.conf does have a dns forwarder = 192.168.1.2 samba-001 the actual host name, and also a PDC, in the same domain. I would like to have the alias my-server point to samba-001. I added a CNAME record: bin/samba-tool dns add 127.0.0.1 mydomain.com my-server CNAME

Hai, ? Im testing out with some dns things.. And i think i have seen more people about this.. ? Debian 7 ( wheezy )?samba 4.1.17 debian backports. only 1 DC, no member, just 1 DC. ? I have added multiple DNS records and zones with the windows tool. sofare good, works ok... ? in one of my zones changed the CNAME of a record. ? for example. ? websitename1.domain.tld?CNAME to

Hello Samba Mailing List We cannot ping or browse to our web site hosted on Amazon S3 because the CNAME entry in our Samba 4 Internal DNS does not resolve properly, and this maybe because of the old version of Samba we are running on our DC. Samba version... 4.1.0pre1-GIT-8aae8b5 Command line used to add CNAME entry... $ /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dns add dc1 domain.com www CNAME

Hello, It seems Samba4 is having problems with CNAME records. I am seeing the same behavior as mentioned in the thread below. Is there any ETA on a fix for this? This is identical to the problem with MX records. This is currently a much bigger problem than the MX records. I appreciate any assistance. [root at DC1 var]# dig autodiscover.testdom.com CNAME ; <<>> DiG

Hello, In an effort to get MX and CNAME records working, I have migrated from Samba's internal DNS to bind9_dlz. I am now seeing strange behavior where CNAME records resolve correctly on the S4 DC, but not from workstations. Please see the case below where I have foo.internal.testdom.com aliased to google.com using a CNAME record. I do not understand why this is occurring This should work,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:20 AM Philippe LeCavalier < support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:09 AM Philippe LeCavalier < > support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> A setup on howto improve your samba

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > A setup on howto improve your samba network and simplify it. > This is how i setup, sure looks dificult but its all about DNS setup and > what you add to it. > > For AD-DC.s ( AD, TIME, NS, LDAP ) > Hostname.FQDN.TLD : max 63chars, incl the .'s allowed chars: a-Z 0-9

I have had an IP Address Record of the name Z37 which was 192.168.2.203. Using nslookup I find it, but samba-tool queries the name and shows 0 Records? $ nslookup Z37 Server: 192.168.2.1 Address: 192.168.2.1#53 Name: Z37.calcdom.local Address: 192.168.2.203 $ samba-tool dns query localhost calcdom.local @ ALL Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=119, refresh=900,

Hi all, I am setting up a new AD server with Samba 4.1.11 from the FreeBSD ports. I struggle with the internal DNS. I add a new CNAME record but it does not show up properly. I gave the AD domain a new DNS domain (domain.fda) and the server the name samba4.domain.fda. I am using the internal DNS, and a forwarder to a bind server in the same network. After the AD provision I have this here

On 05/08/2019 11:53, Patrik wrote: > the ?? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com > <http://patrikx3.com/>"; are my domain names A, AAAA, CNAME-s, that is > where i store then, there is know AD records at all. it is all DLZ. > *_ > _* If 'patrikx3.com' is a registered dns domain name, then you should have used a subdomain of this for the AD dns

On 07.07.2020 21:14, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca: >> >> samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca >> brockley.harte-lyne.ca >> ALL -U administrator >> Password for [BROCKLEY\administrator]: >> ?? Name=, Records=6, Children=0

Doh forgot to cc -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Tuesday 8th April 2014 21:16 > To: G?nter Kukkukk <linux at kukkukk.com> > Subject: RE: [Samba] DNS record info (samba-tool) > > Brilliant, glad about that as zones pretty much done on set up and no worry about a restart. > > Great that adding

On 02/03/2020 13:36, Paul Littlefield wrote: > On 02/03/2020 13:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> Samba runs samba_dnsupgrade on a regular basis, using dns_update_list >> as a template. Amongst the list of dns entries is this: >> >> AAAA ${HOSTNAME}?????????????????????????????????????????? $IP >> > > Hi Rowland, > > Can I change any of

Hi, I'm testing: $ sudo nsd-control status version: 4.0.1 verbosity: 2 I found a loop problem with this record: * IN CNAME none ("none" means no matching record in zone and therefore match * again) Queries that use "* CNAME" will result in a loop. The response will use TCP and will be limited to 65k bytes $ dig @127.0.0.1 sdfgsfg.test.com ;; Truncated,

I am currently in the progress of testing the replacement of a Windows 2003 DC with a Samba4-based one. In the DNS of old Windows DC we had CNAME entries to alias www.domain.com to serverX.domain.com and ftp.domain.com to serverY.domain.com. This is working and can be tested successfully with dig The CNAME entries were correctly replicated across to the internal DNS server on the new Samba4 DC

Well, I have finally installed Samba 4.9 from Van Belle's repo, but still I cannot resolve FQDN's. Dňa 22. 1. 2019 o 15:02 Rowland Penny via samba napísal(a): > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:02 +0100 > "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Rowland, thank You, but this removes only the NS record, but the >> faulty domain A

Hi, Recently we have migrated from samba 3 nt domain to samba 4 AD (4.4.5) and we have detected that some applications are not working correctly, this applications need to access to \\ip resource, with name works, but we have some applications that needs to work only by ip Also detected this problem with some cname in dns are not responding we use bind9 + dlz, and we if we access from \\name

Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything "wrong" RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server? (I'm using EveryDNS.net, and I'd like to make my CNAME records ns1-> 4.myDomain.com correspond to ns1->ns4.EveryDNS.net.) -------------- next part -------------- An