similar to: problem with installing rms package

x=c(5, 8, 28, 29, 30) y=c(5, 8, 28, 29, 31) How can we compare these two vectors, whether each element is exactly matched with the elements in the other vector ? How can we get the non matched elements from both the vectors? Can anyone help? ________________________________ Notice: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient.

Hi i have two arrays of genes names,one with180000 gene names and the other with 24000 gene names,I have to compare both of them for finding common names. I have both the arrays in .csv format.i loaded the files and tried to compare them using for and if loops but I got the error Error in Ops.factor(cgh[i, 1], cgh[j, 2]) : level sets of factors are different Please suggest me how to

Dear list, I'm currently trying to use the rms package to get predicted ordinal responses from a conditional ratio model. As you will see below, my model seems to fit well to the data, however, I'm having trouble getting predicted mean (or fitted) ordinal response values using the predict function. I have a feeling I'm missing something simple, however I haven't been able to

I have two large arrays of strings array1 with 180000 names and array2 with 24000 names ,I want to find the common names in both of them. My arrays are for example Array1 Array2 GAP4 HIST1B-histamine.... MFG12 SNRPD-signal induced... CFH1A

Dear R-users, I am using R 2.13.0 and rms 3.3-0 , but can not reproduce figure 7.8 of the handouts *Regression Modeling Strategies* ( http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/pub/Main/RmS/course2.pdf) by the following code. Could any one help me figure out how to solve this? setwd('C:/Rharrell') require(rms) load('data/counties.sav') older <- counties$age6574 + counties$age75

Hi, I'm using the rms package to do regression analysis using the lrm function. Retrieving odds ratios is possible using summary.rms. However, I could not find any information on how exactly the odds ratios for continuous variables are calculated. It doesn't appear to be the odds ratio at 1 unit increase, because the output of summary.rms did not match the coefficient's value. E.g.

How can I extract the adjusted R^2 value from an ols object (using rms package)? library(rms) x <- rnorm(10) y <- x + rnorm(10) ols1 <- ols(y ~ x) Typing "ols1" displays adjusted R^2 among other things, but how can I assign it to a variable? I tried str(ols1) but couldn't see where to go from there. Thanks, Mark Seeto

The integration of plot methods for various outputs from rms packages is a great appreciated aspect of the rms package. I particularly like to use: plot(summary(model)) for my own purposes, but... for publication/presentation I need to modify details like variable names, or the number of signficant digits used in the figure annotations. Is there a simple way to modify the plot inputs

Hi, in Design package, a plot of survival probability vs. a covariate can be generated by survplot() on a cph object using the folliowing code: n <- 1000 set.seed(731) age <- 50 + 12*rnorm(n) label(age) <- "Age" sex <- factor(sample(c('male','female'), n, TRUE)) cens <- 15*runif(n) h <- .02*exp(.04*(age-50)+.8*(sex=='Female')) dt <-

Dear R-help, I don't understand why Gls gives me an error when trying to fit a model with AR(2) errors, while gls (from nlme) does not. For example: library(nlme) library(rms) set.seed(1) d <- data.frame(x = rnorm(50), y = rnorm(50)) gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) #This works Gls(y ~ x, data=d, correlation = corARMA(p=2)) # Gives error # Error in

The answer to this may be obvious, but I was wondering in the rms package and the survfit(), how you can plot the censored time points as ticks. Take for example, library(survival) library(rms) foo <- data.frame(Time=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,10), Status=c(1,1,0,0,1,1,1)) answer <- survfit(Surv(foo$Time, foo$Status==1) ~1) # this shows the censored time points as ticks at Time = 3 and 4 plot(answer)

Dear All, I wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here. I'm working with the rms library, R 2.9.2 under Windows XP. I'm trying to arrange two plots side by side for a colleague. mfrow or mfcol do not seem to work, however, so I am obviously missing something important. I know that there have been changes in the graphics from Design to rms, but am just not sure where to

Hello, I have a couple of questions about the ols function in Frank Harrell's rms package. Is there any way to specify variables by their column number in the data frame rather than by the variable name? For example, library(rms) x1 <- rnorm(100, 0, 1) x2 <- rnorm(100, 0, 1) x3 <- rnorm(100, 0, 1) y <- x2 + x3 + rnorm(100, 0, 5) d <- data.frame(x1, x2, x3, y) rm(x1, x2, x3,

I would like to incorporate multiple summary plots from the rms package into a single device and to control the titles, and also to open a new device when I reach a specified number of plots. Currently I am only getting a single "plot(summary(" graph in the upper left- hand corner of each successive device. However, in the rms documention I see instances of a loop being used with

Hello, I am using Dr. Harrell's rms package to make a nomogram. I was able to make a beautiful one. However, I want to change 5-year survival probability to 5-year failure probability. I couldn?t get hazard rate from Hazard(f1) because I used cph for the model. Here is my code: library(rms) f1 <- cph(Surv(retime,dfs) ~ age+her2+t_stage+n_stage+er+grade+cytcyt+Cyt_PCDK2 , data=data11,

Dear fellow R-users, I?m using the Glm function (gamma family of distributions) from the rms package to compare 2 groups on costs data. Although the summary function does provide the mean cost difference and standard errors, I believe these values were in the (natural) log ratio format. Is there a function to express these values into the original scale of the response variable (i.e., dollars)

Dear R users: In Prof. Harrell's library rms, calibrate.rms plot the Bias-corrected Probability and Apparent Probability. The latter one can be retrieved from class calibrate.default. But how to retrieve the former one. BW *Yao Zhu* *Department of Urology Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai, China* [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I would like to increase the number of iterations for running a Buckley-James regression model in the rms package, but something is apparently syntactically wrong. The following code initially is exactly as it appears in the help page (which runs successfully), then a "failure to converge" message (resulting from specifying an 'identity' link argument, the error message

Hello List: Does anyone know if there's a way to annotate the plots produced by the plot.xmean.ordinaly function in the rms package. I'd like to produce publication quality figures, but first need to annotate the axis labels. Is there a way to do that? I appreciate any advice. Chris [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear colleagues, I have a question regarding controlling the jitter when plotting predictions in the rms package. Below I've simulated some data that reflect what I'm working with. The model predicts a continuous variable with an ordinal score, a two-level group, and a continuous covariate. Of primary interest is a plot of the group by score interaction, where the score is the ordinal