similar to: Strange "Error: subscript out of bounds"

Hi, I have a nginx server which is using the proxy protocol to forward tcp connections to dovecot. Dovecot is configured to be a submission service for email to be sent. Then postfix should send the email itself which is also using the ha proxy protocol. There are a few moving parts in this problem so I'm not sure where the problem is. But I want to ask if somebody can validate my dovecot

Hi everyone, I've got a dataframe called 'faculty'. I want to do a weighted mean on the column called 'Q8' weighted by the contents of column 'CETP'. In addition, I need to operate on the result of splitting 'faculty' according to the contents of a column 'FACULTY'. For example > lapply(split(faculty$Q8, faculty$FACULTY), mean) $"1" [1]

Hello, I have a table (1) of the form q1 q3 q4 q8 q9 A 5 2 0 1 3 B 2 0 2 4 4 I have another table (2): q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 C 10 7 4 2 6 9 3 1 2 I would like to divide the numbers in table (1) by the number of the appropriate column in table (2): q1 q3 q4 q8 q9 A 5/10 2/4 0/2 1/1 3/2 B 2/10 0/4 2/2 4/1 4/2

----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvano" <silvano at uel.br> To: <r-help at r-project.org> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:07 AM Subject: Tables and merge > Hi, > > I have 21 files which is common variable CODE. > Each file refers to a question. > > I would like to join the 21 files into one, to construct > tables for each question by CODE. >

On 14 October 2013 19:31, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote: > Renato, can you post the c code for the function and the assembly that gcc > produces? > Attached. Your initial example could be well handled by vectorization of strided > loops (and the mentioning of VLD3(.8?)/VST3(.8?) lead me to assume that > this is what happened). But the LLVM-IR you

Hi all, I’m not sure if this is the right list, so apologies if not. Doing some profiling I noticed some of my hand-tuned matrix multiply code with NEON intrinsics was much slower through a C++ template wrapper vs calling the intrinsics function directly. It turned out clang/LLVM was unable to eliminate a temporary even though the case seemed quite straightforward. Unfortunately any loads

Hi everyone, I wonder if there's a patient soul out there who has a minute to look at the following. I've got a set of summary statistics I need to perform many times. Naturally, I've looked at writing a function to automate the process as much as possible. (These are the data I mentioned recently in my question about weighted means.) I'm having trouble figuring out the proper

Hello! First of all, 100x thanks to Monty and colleagues: you have done an excellent job! I just didn't believe my ears when I first tested Oggenc 1.0 at q0 to q1 - it sounds AMAZINGLY GOOD !!! But as HDD drives are getting larger and cheaper, most of us move toward higher quality settings ......... I use q8, because: - I was able to ABX some test samples up to q4.99 - at q8 Ogg is still

Hi Duncan, I also thought it was a bug, especially since it worked with LLVM 3.0, but since it is not defined by ABI, I was not sure if I need to submit it as a BUG. I wanted to be sure that it is an actual BUG before submitting it and got the not-a-bug answer. Here is a small example to reproduce the problem I'm experiencing: ; ModuleID = 'bugparam.ll' target datalayout =

On Sep 5, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hmmm. Well, it's entirely possible that it's LLVM that's confused about the alignment requirements here. :) > > I think I see, in general, where. I twiddled the IR to give it higher alignment (16 bytes) and get: > extend: @ @extend > @ BB#0: > vldr d16,

Hi Sebastien, > I also thought it was a bug, especially since it worked with LLVM 3.0, but since it is not defined by ABI, I was not sure if I need to submit it as a BUG. yes it is a bug. > I wanted to be sure that it is an actual BUG before submitting it and got the not-a-bug answer. I didn't read Nadav's reply as saying there was no bug, in fact he explicitly said in his email

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know if LLVM Neon intrinsics are designed to support only 'Legal' types for NEON units. > Using llc -march=arm -mcpu=cortex-a9 vmax4.ll -o vmax4.s on following ll code: > > > ; ModuleID = 'vmax.ll' > target datalayout =

Hi all, I would like to know if LLVM Neon intrinsics are designed to support only 'Legal' types for NEON units. Using llc -march=arm -mcpu=cortex-a9 vmax4.ll -o vmax4.s on following ll code: ; ModuleID = 'vmax.ll' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-n32" target triple =

Hmmm. Well, it's entirely possible that it's LLVM that's confused about the alignment requirements here. :) I think I see, in general, where. I twiddled the IR to give it higher alignment (16 bytes) and get: extend: @ @extend @ BB#0: vldr d16, [r0] vmovl.s16 q8, d16 vstmia r1, {d16, d17} vldr d16, [r0, #8] add r0, r1, #16 vmovl.s16 q8, d16 vstmia

Hi Eli, Thanks for the answer, it clarifies the situation for me. Do you know if there is Pass in LLVM that could be adapted to 'legalize' intrinsics calls ? Or shall I define my own intrinsics for non supported types ? Best Regards Seb ________________________________________ De : Eli Friedman [eli.friedman at gmail.com] Date d'envoi : vendredi 21 septembre 2012 11:54 À : Sebastien

I unzipped simple captcha in vendor/plugins Then I did >rake simple_captcha:setup Gave error: rake aborted! no such file to load -- RMagick2.so SO I thought Rmagick has to be installed. So downloaded 2.12.0 binary gem for Ruby 1.8.6 DT 2009-10-04 16:05 RMagick-2.12.0-ImageMagick-6.5.6-8-Q8.zip Unzipped the file Ran ImageMagick-6.5.6-8-Q8-windows-dll.exe It installed the program in

I installed ImageMagick 6.5.6 and all seems to be installed ok. I downloaded ImageMagick 6.5.6 I entered $ ./configure and everything seems OK. When I enter $ identify -version I get Version: ImageMagick 6.5.6-6 2009-09-30 Q8 OpenMP http://www.imagemagick.org Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2009 ImageMagick Studio LLC I then enter $ sudo gem install rmagick I get Building native extensions.

Hi all I have spent the last three days evaluating CELT on our supported platforms. I found a bug in quant_bands.c, that due to processor/compilation differences did not cause an issue on x86 platforms, but is a problem on the MIPS processor embedded devices. When decoding on the MIPS devices, there was a lot of noise added during the decoding, the noise is mainly in the 15 khz to 21 khz range.

On 4 February 2013 18:25, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote: > For cases where this approach breaks really badly we could consider adding > a specialized api or parameters (like the type of a user/use). But we > should do so only as a last resort and backed by actual code that would > benefit from doing so. > Very sensible, more or less what I had in

On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Thanks for the answer, it clarifies the situation for me. Do you know if there is Pass in LLVM that could be adapted to 'legalize' intrinsics calls ? > Or shall I define my own intrinsics for non supported types ? You should never generate these sorts of intrinsics with