similar to: network settings for an isolated network

I am running KVM on Centos 6.3 and am seeing an unexplained shut down of two guests. The libvirt package was upgraded to libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.4.x86_64 at the time of the shutdown. Only the two guests shown below was affected, while 9 others running on the same hypervisor were not. Can some one help me to find the cause please ? Regards Chandana GUEST #1 ======== 2013-04-10

On 06/13/2015 01:05 PM, jd1008 wrote: <<<>>> > Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist > that is not viewable by the user. > The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed > entries. and you know this how? i do not really believe there is a 'hidden whitelist'. it is more like there are sites that are used to check on sites you

With Libvirt under modern kernels, you can't use <interface type='ethernet'> unless QEMU is running as root. Running qemu as root is not ideal, but I was able to track down the issue to this linux change: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ca6bb5d7ab22ac79f608fe6cbc6b12de6a5a19f0 Which means that if you're seeing errors like this:

Hi all, I've got a weird issue, and I'm trying to confirm if it's a bug, and if so, if there is a workaround until it is fixed. The situation is this: If I virsh reboot <domain> --mode acpi, it will actually reboot the domain cleanly (watching from the console allows me to see the full shutdown messages, followed by a bootup). However, after this point, virsh domstate

On 3/2/2015 1:41 PM, Brian Rak wrote: > With Libvirt under modern kernels, you can't use <interface > type='ethernet'> unless QEMU is running as root. > > Running qemu as root is not ideal, but I was able to track down the > issue to this linux change: > >

Hi all Which is the fastest way to gsub a 5000 char string. i.e. big_string = "i am so <script>..3000char...</script>big<noscript>...2000 char...</noscript> gsub me!!!" # If i run: big_string.gsub(/<script(.|\s)*<\/script>/i, '' '').gsub(/<noscript>/, '' '').gsub(/</noscript>/, '' '')

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > 2.0 model works fine > > 2.1 crashes with following: > > /tmp/buildd/qemu-2.0.92+rev1/hw/i386/smbios.c:825: smbios_get_tables: > Assertion `smbios_smp_sockets >= 1' failed > > Not sure if bisect will help much, but the commit which introduced > this platform works

Hi, I was wondering whether it's possible to run libvirtd inside a chroot environment. The assumption is that only one instance of libvirtd would be running on the machine at a time, but still, inside chroot. Currently in my chroot env I have: - /dev/kvm added with mknod - /dev/vhost-net added with mknod - mounted:   - /dev/net   - /dev/shm   - /run/dbus When I run libvirtd in

On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>> that is not viewable by the user. >>>> The whitelist tab does NOT

On 06/12/2015 11:25 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > jd1008 wrote: >> On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, >>>> from MySQL. >>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the >>> bugs introduced by moz

jd1008 wrote: > On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >>> >>> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>>> that is not viewable by the user.

On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, ken wrote: > On 09/20/2017 01:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> Previously when firefox went catatonic >> to the point that I could not even scroll, >> its CPU usage had gone to 100%+. >> Now top tells me that firefox, Web Content (with a space) >> or sometimes kswap... has process state D, >> uninterruptable sleep. >> >>

Am Donnerstag, 17. M?rz 2016, 08:57:40 CET schrieb Gordon Messmer: > On 03/17/2016 08:26 AM, G?nther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > Have any a hint why ? The Problem is starting on three different Server, near to the same time ???? This is my Panic Situation. > You're going to have to provide logs, or error messages, or something. This is a a log from a client ? starting up

On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >> that is not viewable by the user. >> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed >> entries. > You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on > my computer and

On 6/08/19 6:33 AM, Richard wrote: >> Javascript - if you're using firefox, install NoScript last week. > > NoScript selectively blocks javascript, it doesn't turn it off -- > which for testing purposes, at least, is the goal. > > In ff -- about:config - then enter "javascript" in the search line > and set "javascript.enabled" to false. >

<script src='http://img823.imageshack.us/shareable/?i=screenshot1mr.png&p=tl' type='text/javascript'></script><noscript>[Image: http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/3043/screenshot1mr.png ] (http://img823.imageshack.us/i/screenshot1mr.png/)</noscript> any one know to fix that? Im trying to play The sims Medieval.

On Thu, January 22, 2015 12:27, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:36:24AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> If one has already done all that and, following the most recent FF update, all that is displayed is a video window with the Flash >> logo/Button in the middle. And regardless of how many times one clicks on said button no video will show or sound will emit, what

On Fri, June 12, 2015 2:03 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:38:35PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> I was just using that as an example of damaging javascripts. >> The current version of noscript no longer tells the number of >> javascrits that are blocked out of the total (per web site). >> In the older versions, I would dlete all entries in the visible

Not a biggie, but definitely annoying: I try to register for a media site, so I can put in a comment, and every time I hit "register", noscript pops up telling me it's protecting me from cross-site scripting... and if it's giving me any way to say, "that's ok for this site", I don't see it. I've tried typing in a pattern for xss, and no joy. Clues for the

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist > that is not viewable by the user. > The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed > entries. You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on my computer and it wasn't really web sites, just internal chrome URLs like