similar to: ping latency using vhost_net, macvtap and virtio

Hi all, I have emails with multiple Delivered-To: headers in them. The problem is that the SEARCH command only searches in the first instances. For example: 1 FETCH 14557 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (Delivered-To)] * 14557 FETCH (BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DELIVERED-TO)] {85} Delivered-To: pozsy at ojjektum.uhulinux.hu Delivered-To: szamlagyar at uhusystems.com ) 1 OK Fetch completed. 1 SEARCH HEADER

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-5.2 Hi, We're seeing weird behaviour regarding network traffic between a Xen dom0 and domU. I reported this issue yesterday to the openvswitch-discuss mailing list, but it seems this could also be a (regression?) bug in the xen hypervisor or the linux kernel... (we've upgraded xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 -> 4.0.1-5.2 and

I apologize for the TLDR-style email, but I wanted to demonstrate that I have done a lot of work (11 hours and at least 8 tutorials including the tinc docs) before asking for help. My basic problem is this: tinc appears to properly connect and authenticate the client to the server, but I cannot ping or access resources. (yes. I know there is no 'server' in tinc, but 'server'

Hello everyone. After all the problems I had demoting my DC and managed it to work again, it was working for only a week. Now i am getting this messages on the log: [2014/07/22 16:13:11.745783, 0] .../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

Dear R helpers, I have been using the loadings function from the multiv library and I get the typical output (see below). When I try to export these results to a file using a write.table() I get the following error message "Error in as.data.frame.default(x[[i]], optional = TRUE) : can't coerce loadings into a data.frame" Any idea why write.table is doing that and any

Sadly you failed to set your email program to send plain text and the data is corrupted at my end. I also think you need to reduce the size of the data set... the intent here is to increase your understanding, not debug your particular analysis. I will say that I am having a very challenging time understanding what you are trying to accomplish though. What are the equations that you think need

Hi, I'm using libvirt and qemu on Debian Wheezy. I'm having a strange behavior. Guests can't connect to each other when they're on the same host. On the host I'm using bonding (in active / backup mode) and vlan. It looks like this : eth0 \ / macvtap0 bond0 --- vlan222 eth1 / \ macvtap1 So I've got two guests, let's say A and B. When

OK, Let's try this again! Here is the reproducible script; it is long because I had to copy the panel dataset here. My question is related to systemfit; I don't know how to get the result for the entire panel. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) install.packages("systemfit")

Hi, Unable to do peer probe... and unable to figure out whats the reason from the gluster log. can someone help ? 1) This is what i was trying... gluster> peer probe llm19.in.ibm.com Probe unsuccessful Probe returned with unknown errno 107 gluster> peer probe 9.124.111.25 Probe unsuccessful Probe returned with unknown errno 107 gluster> peer status Number of Peers: 1 Hostname:

Hi all I am trying to generate a normal unbalanced data to estimate the coefficients of LM, LMM, GLM, and GLMM and their standard errors. Also, I am trying to estimate the variance components and their standard errors. Further, I am trying to use the likelihood ratio test to test H0: sigma^2_b = 0 (random effects variance component), and the t-test to test H0:mu=0 (intercept of the model Yij = mu

Hi, Greg, Eddie, I found that in SR-IOV + HVM environment, ping latency depends on ping interval. The NIC is Intel 82576 (1000Mbps), server uses xen-4.0.1, domain-0 is kernel-2.6.32 and HVM is kernel-2.6.31. The server and client are connected through a 1000Mbps switch. The data is as following: # ping -i 1 192.168.0.21 PING 192.168.0.21 (192.168.0.21) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

As the subject line says: Is PING a good indicator of network latency? If not, how can I measure latency? Thanks, Cosmin Prund

Hello! Over the last couple of days I?ve been trouble shooting a strange problem with Asterisk. First of all, I should say that I?ve been running Asterisk on a Fedora Core 3 box since last May, but decided to do a reinstallation of everything due to some problems we?ve had with echos during conversations (100% SIP based, so no ZAP echos). We are talking about a low-volume installation

I currently work on a draft of an aquatic bioassessment. The conditions tested are the following: ER river water T dechlorinated water control 0.5 + 0.5mg / L of malate T + 1 dechlorinated water control + 1g / L of malate T ED dechlorinated water control SED + ER + river water sediment SED ED + sediment + water dechlorinated. It is the result of AChE in muscle (fillet of fish). The production of

Hello All First, sorry by my poor english, hope you understand me :-) I have a problem, i don't understand or don't know how to solve I need to interconnect 2 networks with different numbers. One is 192.168.236.0/24 the other 192.168.1.0/24. Mainly i need to access services in the 236. from the 1. one. I have a CentOS 5.5 machine with 2 nics each one configured to work in one of the

Hi all, I'm seeing this failure on my PPC G4 box running TOT with llvm-gcc 4.2. Is anyone else seeing this? I'm sure it's related to the byval stuff that's recently gone into LLVM. I'm attaching the output of this command: $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O3 -S -o - -emit-llvm /Users/wendling/llvm/ llvm.src/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c As you can see in it, there

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist [resending from another address since my ISP seems to be queueing emails for up to 25 hours and counting...] I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02

Dear List , We are using intel 82599EB based SRIOV capable 10GbE cards on the host machine.The VFs are being assigned to the guest in pass through mode and are providing the network connectivity as expected. However when we shutdown the guest the connectivity does not comes back via the VFs on the guest in next boot unless the VFs are detached from the *guest* *before* initiating a shutdown of

I've just found the lavaan package, and I really appreciate it, as it seems to succeed with models that were failing in sem::sem. I need some clarification, however, in the output, and I was hoping the list could help me. I'll go with the standard example from the help documentation, as my problem is much larger but no more complicated than that. My question is, why is there one latent