Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "chown, chgrp?"
2018 Oct 09
2
how to use for example Domain Users of samba using chown chgrp
i am using chgrp and chown to change ownership from centos command line of
paths for example domain users to use it in chgrp bur it is telling me the
error that no such group exist.
what i must do to be able to use samba users and groups from command line
using chown and chgrp
thank you
2007 Aug 15
2
chown and chgrp on 4.5 vs 5.0
I just noticed that on centso 4.5 I have an executable with the +s
(chmod +s myexe)
doing a chmod root myexe and chown root myexe does NOT affect the +s
setting.
However, on centos 5 this is not the case.
chmod +s myexe
chown root myexe or chgrp root myexe
will DROP the +s status.
How can I get around this?
I want to keep the owner, group, world settings.
Thanks,
Jerry
2008 Nov 24
5
[Bug 1541] New: sftp: the do_stat() failure is ignored for chown, chgrp ops. in parse_dispatch_command()
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541
Summary: sftp: the do_stat() failure is ignored for chown,
chgrp ops. in parse_dispatch_command()
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: sftp
2007 Mar 08
0
chown/chgrp for winbind users doesn`t work
Hello,
I have two Samba Domains and each trust each other (PDCs run 3.0.22). Also
I have a samba member server (3.0.24) that runs winbind. When I use wbinfo
I can see the user and groups of both domains. I also can chown/chgrp
files with users of the domain the server is member of. But I can`t
chown/chgrp with accounts of the trusted domain. chown doesn`t work at
all. chgrp works, but then only
2018 Jun 06
2
how to use chgrp command for samba groups
i use chgrp -R "Domain Users" /profiles for example
but i receive no such group available in chgrp command
what i must do to be able to have the samba groups available in linux
environment
using the the chgrp and accepting them.
thank you
2011 Jun 29
1
R-devel Digest, Vol 100, Issue 28
I get the same style of path as Hadley. This is on Windows 7 Home Premium with SP1.
I start R by clicking on the R-2.31.0 icon.
I'd assumed that it was a change that came with R-2.13.0!
(On 32-bit Windows XP, which I have just checked, I do indeed get the 8.3 paths.)
> R.home()
[1] "C:/Programs/R/R-2.13.0"
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.13.0 (2011-04-13)
Platform:
2006 Oct 31
0
6362068 zfs chown/chgrp doesn''t always work
Author: marks
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: daa24505790be2859c3416a615beb97cbe02db68
Log message:
6362068 zfs chown/chgrp doesn''t always work
Files:
update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
update: usr/src/uts/common/os/policy.c
update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/policy.h
2016 Apr 05
2
chgrp "Domain Admins" on folder return invalid group "Domain Admins"
Hi Denis,
Thank you for your mail.
I assigned the GID 10000 to the domain admins group through ADUC, and
wbinfo --info-group "domain admins" display the correct output.
But i am still not able to execute succesfuly #chgrp "Domain Admins"
/home/demo
And when i go to ADUC and try to open the Unix Attribute of domain admins
group, i have the error "Unable to
2015 Jul 27
8
[Bug 11414] New: rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed: Operation not permitted (1)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414
Bug ID: 11414
Summary: rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed:
Operation not permitted (1)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
2016 Apr 04
3
chgrp "Domain Admins" on folder return invalid group "Domain Admins"
Dear Samba users and admins,
I am trying to deploy Samba4 as a domain controller and a file server and
having some issues.*
The domain have been well provisioned with option --use-rfc2307
I am then trying to create share by following this samba wiki
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs
The problem is that i cannot succeed to change the group owner of the
folder I want to
2007 Aug 30
1
strange chgrp behavior
Greetings,
i had a following problem, which on one side i have already solved, but
on other side i don't thing it should behave this way and wish somebody to
tell if it is feature or bug ;-)
[root at machine home]# chown user user/
[root at machine home]# ls -ld /home/user
drwxr-xr-x 66 user staff 4096 /home/user
[root at machine home]# chgrp -R staff user/
[root at machine home]# ls -ld
2016 Apr 05
2
chgrp "Domain Admins" on folder return invalid group "Domain Admins"
Dear all,
thank you for your previous mails. It realy help me.
Denis, Following your mail and thanks to the link i configure my
/etc/nsswitch.conf file by adding windbind to user and group line and
execute winbindd command.
As i install samba4 from sernet package, init script are created for
starting AD, smbd, nmbd and winbindd. But i read that smbd, nmd and
winbindd should be disable to
2004 Dec 20
1
rsync: chgrp ... Operation not permitted
Hi all,
I've installed rsync to synchronize my linux box and my PowerBook.
I have a server whose conf file looks like
[letters]
use chroot = yes
uid = www
gid = lha.utils
path = /var/hdb/letters
read only = no
list = yes
auth users = pascal,lha
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secret
but when the client tries to write I have:
rsync: chgrp "/file/path/here" failed: Operation not
2011 Nov 09
1
default Dovecot-LDA CHGRP/CHMOD
I am familiar with this article
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#multipleuids
I want to disable setuid-root, but I don't know the default group and
permissions.
sudo chgrp root /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
sudo chmod 00750 /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
but my delivery is still failing
Nov 9 18:22:39 vl42 postfix/pipe[23039]: DEC54700B1: to=<user at domain.com>,
orig_to=<user at
2007 Apr 23
1
chgrp problem
I'm using a comand like
rsync -av directory /media/usbdisk/
to backup to a usb device (on a Fedora 5 machine). I'm getting 100s of messages like
rsync: chgrp "/media/usbdisk/file" failed: Operation not permitted (1)
and then at the end
rsync error: some files could not be transferred.
How do I fix this? Why is rsync trying to change the group? And is the message at
2015 Nov 17
1
using chown on server with Domain username
Just replied to another thread with the same problem...
This is on a member server, not the DC.
No the second chgrp command with the escaped space doesn't work.
Getent returns big numbers for the uids and gids.... too big, I think.
root at florence:/home# getent passwd Administrator
administrator:*:4294967295:4294967295::/home/IOL/administrator:/bin/false
root at florence:/home# getent
2010 Oct 14
2
Dovecot chgrp actions on new files/folders
Timo,
I did further study of the user/group permissions. Applying the below
patch will make no difference to virtually everyone out there. Those
that have default uid/gid ownership won't see any change as the gid
already matches so the fchown() action won't be attempted. Those that
have sgid will still see the normal expected fchown() enforced by the
kernel which becomes a duplicated
2016 Apr 05
0
chgrp "Domain Admins" on folder return invalid group "Domain Admins"
Hi Jules,
> I am trying to deploy Samba4 as a domain controller and a file server and
> having some issues.*
>
> The domain have been well provisioned with option --use-rfc2307
>
> I am then trying to create share by following this samba wiki
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs
>
> The problem is that i cannot succeed to change the group owner of
2017 Nov 06
0
[Bug 11414] rsync: chgrp "/.filename.5afK5X" (in dirdir) failed: Operation not permitted (1)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11414
--- Comment #2 from Michal Ruprich <mruprich at redhat.com> ---
I stumbled upon this bug and I have a question. I get the chgrp error even when
running the daemon as root.
#ps -aux | grep rsync
root 18486 0.0 0.0 114696 568 ? Ss 09:41 0:00 rsync --daemon
I have configured a module in /etc/rsyncd.conf like this:
[my_data]
2017 Jun 14
1
[WISH / PATCH] possibility to split string literals across multiple lines
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Simon Urbanek
<simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
> As I recall this has been discussed at least a few times (unfortunately I'm traveling so can't check the references), but the justification was never satisfactory.
>
> Personally, I wouldn't mind string continuation supported since it makes for more readable code (I had one of my