similar to: Rd] Numerics behind splineDesign

Hi, I would like to fit an (interpolating) spline to data where the derivatives at the endpoints of the interval are nonzero, thus the natural spline endpoint-specification does not make sense. Books (de Boor, etc) suggest that in this case I use not-a-knot splines. I know what not-a-knot splines are (so if I were solving for the coefficients directly I knew how to do this), but I don't

Hi, I am trying to find an elegant way to compute and store some frequently used matrices "on demand". The Matrix package already uses something like this for storing decompositions, but I don't know how to do it. The actual context is the following: A list has information about a basis of a B-spline space (nodes, order) and gridpoints at which the basis functions would be

Hello I'm using function gam from package mgcv to fit splines. ?When I try to make a prediction slightly beyond the original 'x' range, I get this error: > A = runif(50,1,149) > B = sqrt(A) + rnorm(50) > range(A) [1] 3.289136 145.342961 > > > fit1 = gam(B ~ s(A, bs="ps"), outer.ok=TRUE) > predict(fit1, newdata=data.frame(A=149.9), outer.ok=TRUE) Error

Dear all, I need to compute tensor product of B-spline defined over equi-spaced break-points. I wrote my own program (it works in a 2-dimensional setting) library(splines) # set the break-points Knots = seq(-1,1,length=10) # number of splines M = (length(Knots)-4)^2 # short cut to splineDesign function bspline = function(x) splineDesign(Knots,x,outer.ok = T) # bivariate tensor product of

Hello, I've noticed that SPLUS seems to have a function for evaluating derivative matrices of splines. I've found the R function that evaluates matrices from 'smooth.spline'; maybe someone has written something to do the same with smooth.basis? regards, s

I generally run 'make; make check' (with more settings) when building the Debian package. Running 3.2.4 rc from last night, I see a lot of package loading issues during 'make check'. Here is splines as one examples: checking package 'splines' * using log directory '/build/r-base-3.2.3.20160303/tests/splines.Rcheck' * using R version 3.2.4 RC (2016-03-02 r70270) *

Dear R developers, The trace of the hat matrix H~(n,n) is computed as follows: tr(H) = tr(BS^-1B') = tr(S^-1B'B) := tr(X) = sum(diag(X)) with B~(n,p), S~(p,p). Since p is of the order 10^3 but S is sparse I would like to employ Taucs linear solver ( http://www.tau.ac.il/~stoledo/taucs/ ) on SX = B'B. (Further improvement by implying a looping over i=1,...,p, calling

--- On Mon, 3/12/12, aleksandr shfets <a_shfets at mail.ru> wrote: > From: aleksandr shfets <a_shfets at mail.ru> > Subject: Fwd: Re[2]: [R] B-spline/smooth.basis derivative matrices > To: "Vassily Shvets" <shv736 at yahoo.com> > Received: Monday, March 12, 2012, 5:15 PM > > > > -------- ???????????? ????????? > -------- > ?? ????:

Hi, I am curious about how to interpret the results of a polynomial regression-- using poly(raw=TRUE) vs. poly(raw=FALSE). set.seed(123456) x <- rnorm(100) y <- jitter(1*x + 2*x^2 + 3*x^3 , 250) plot(y ~ x) l.poly <- lm(y ~ poly(x, 3)) l.poly.raw <- lm(y ~ poly(x, 3, raw=TRUE)) s <- seq(-3, 3, by=0.1) lines(s, predict(l.poly, data.frame(x=s)), col=1) lines(s,

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:30:10PM +0100, oliver oli wrote: > John Koleszar wrote: > >I hadn't even heard > >of ambisonics until your post, to be honest. > > because people don't know how to distribute ambisonics. no way to play > it in a DVD player. there are no easy to use software players that > decode ambisonic files and there are no widely used audio

I like what smooth.spline does but I am unclear on the output. I can see from the documentation that there are fit.coef but I am unclear what those coeficients are applied to.With spline I understand the "noraml" coefficients applied to a cubic polynomial. But these coefficients I am not sure how to interpret. If I had a description of the algorithm maybe I could figure it out but as it

Dear List, I'm using gam in a multiple imputation framework -- specifying the knot locations, and saving the results of multiple models, each of which is fit with slightly different data (because some of it is predicted when missing). In MI, coefficients from multiple models are averaged, as are variance-covariance matrices. VCV's get an additional correction to account for how

Dear All, I'm interested in creating a function similar to ns() from package splines that can be passed in a model formula. The idea is to produce "safe" predictions from a model using this function. As I have seen, to do this I need to use makepredictcall(). Consider the following toy example: myns <- function (x, df = NULL, knots = NULL, intercept = FALSE, Boundary.knots =

Goodmorning, This is a documentation related question about the B-spline function in R. In the help file it is stated that: "df degrees of freedom; one can specify df rather than knots; bs() then chooses df-degree-1 knots at suitable quantiles of x (which will ignore missing values)." So if one were to specify a spline with 6 degrees of freedom (and no intercept) then a basis

Hello. I seem to be having the same problem that Paul had in the thread titled "[Rd] R 2.15.2 make check failure on 32-bit --with-blas="-lgoto2"" from October of last year <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2012-October/065103.html> Unfortunately, that thread ended without an answer to his last question. Briefly, I am trying to compile an Rblas for Windows NT 32bit

Dear, When fitting the following model knots <- 5 lrm.NDWI <- lrm(m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI,knots) I obtain the following result: Logistic Regression Model lrm(formula = m.arson ~ rcs(NDWI, knots)) Frequencies of Responses 0 1 666 35 Obs Max Deriv Model L.R. d.f. P C Dxy Gamma Tau-a R2 Brier 701 5e-07 34.49

Dear list, if I do smooth.spline(tmpSec, tmpT, all.knots=T) with the attached data, I get this error-message: Error in smooth.spline(tmpSec, tmpT, all.knots = T) : smoothing parameter value too small If I do smooth.spline(tmpSec[-single arbitrary number], tmpT[-single arbitrary number], all.knots=T) it works! I just don't see it. It works for hundrets other datasets, but not for

Hi, there, I have 5 datasets. I would like to choose a basis spline with same knots in GAM function in order to obtain same basis function for 5 datasets. Moreover, the basis spline is used to for an interaction of two covarites. I used "cr" in one covariate, but it can only smooth w.r.t 1 covariate. Can anyone give me some suggestion about how to choose a proper smoothing spline

Hi, I have a question about the usage of eval(). Wonder if any experienced user can help me out of it. I use eval() in the following function: semireg.pwl <- function(coef.s=rnorm(1),coef.a=rnorm(1),knots.pos=knots.x,knots.ini.val=knots.val){ knotn <- length(knots.pos) def.par.env <- sys.frame(1) print(def.par.env) print(environment(coef.s)) tg <- eval( (parse(text=

Dear List, I'm using GAMs in a multiple imputation project, and I want to be able to combine the parameter estimates and covariance matrices from each completed dataset's fitted model in the end. In order to do this, I need the knots to be uniform for each model with partially-imputed data. I want to specify these knots based on the quantiles of the unique values of the non-missing