similar to: Changes to parser in R-devel

Hello, I am migrating my package lambda.r to R3.0.0 and am experiencing some issues with the getParserData function (which replaces the parser package). Basically the function works in the R shell but fails when either called from RUnit or from R CMD check. I've narrowed it down to the function getSrcfile, which is returning different values depending on the code path. From the command line

This seems like a bug to me: code <- 'x <- r"(hello, "world")"' getParseData(parse(text = code)) #> line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text #> 7 1 1 1 24 7 0 expr FALSE #> 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 SYMBOL TRUE x #> 3 1 1 1 1 3 7 expr

I would like to map the parsed tokens obtained from utils::getParseData() to the parse tree and elements obtained by base::parse(). It looks like back when this code was in the parser package the parse() function annotated the elements in the tree with their id, which would allow you to perform this mapping. However when the code was included in R this functionality was removed. ?getParseData

Probably need a generic tree based on "ParseNode" objects that associate the line information with the symbol (for leaf nodes). As Duncan notes, it should be possible to gather that from the table. But it would be nice if there was an "expr" column in the parse data column in addition to "text". It would contain the parsed object. Otherwise, to use the table, one is

Hi, With R-3.1.0 I get: > getParseData(parse(text = "{1}", keep.source = TRUE)) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 7 1 1 1 3 7 9 expr FALSE 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 '{' TRUE { 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 5 expr FALSE 4 1 3 1

Hi all, Is the next behaviour suitable? identical(F,FALSE) ## [1] TRUE utils::getParseData(parse(text = "c(F,FALSE)", keep.so=rce = TRUE)) ## line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text ## 14 1 1 1 10 14 0 expr FALSE ## 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 SYMBOL_FUNCTION_CALL TRUE c ## 3 1 1 1 1 3

I don't know, maybe it would make sense to keep the whole expression, that's the text of the tag after all. Also, if we don't keep the whole expression, then it is not a valid string literal any more, because it does not have quoting. I can try to look into a patch. This is for 4.1 I believe, so in some sense it is not urgent? Gabor On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:31 PM <luke-tierney

I have two use cases in mind: 1) Code indexing/searching, where the table gets me almost all of the way there, except I ask for all of the text (including the calls) and then parse that, because it's nice to get back an actual code object when you are searching code (in addition to where the code lives). The extra parsing step is just a minor inconvenience. 2) Code analysis, which I'm

Hi, The imaginary unit is gone in the 'text' column in the returned data frame from getParseData(), e.g. in the example below, perhaps the text should be 1i instead of 1: > p=parse(text='1i') > getParseData(p) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 expr

Hi, The text column for '->' becomes '<-' in the data frame returned by getParseData(): > getParseData(parse(text='1->x')) line1 col1 line2 col2 id parent token terminal text 7 1 1 1 4 7 0 expr FALSE 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 NUM_CONST TRUE 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 7 expr FALSE 3

As Michael guessed my main use cases was code analysis. A concrete example where this would help is with my test code coverage tool covr. There is currently a bug when tracking coverage for if / else statements when the clauses do not contain brackets (https://github.com/jimhester/covr/issues/39). Because only one source reference is generated in this case (because it is parsed as a single

6 ?????? 2023 ?. 22:54:24 GMT+03:00, mikkmart via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> ?????: >The pattern of functions accepting other functions as inputs and >passing additional ... arguments to them is prevalent throughout >the R ecosystem. Currently, however, all such functions must one >way or another tackle the problem of inadvertently passing arguments >meant to go to

I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available only for the *last* file in the package. See [1] for a small example package with just two functions f and g in two files a.R and b.R. See [2] for a documented test run on installed package (Ubuntu 15.10, UTF-8 locale, R 3.2.3). Same behavior with

Maybe someone has already suggested this, but if your functions accepted strings you could use sub or gsub to replace the -> with a symbol that parsed at the same precedence as <-, say <<-. Then parse it and deal with it. When it is time to display the parsed and perhaps manipulated formulae to the user, deparse it and do the reverse replacement. > encode <-

Many thanks to Henrik for remembering the report in Bugzilla and to Kurt for implementing the change and finding out the true number of affected packages. On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:34:41 -0500 Ian Farm <ian.farm at maine.edu> wrote: > Would packages using the underscore placeholder with the native pipe > need to also depend on R >= 4.2.0? That's a good find! For the R >= 4.2

>>>>> Ivan Krylov via R-devel writes: Thanks. I am already looking handling the 4.2.0 placeholder syntax, but likely will need to refactor the code I added yesterday. The "experimental" 4.3.0 extra placeholder feature looks like a lot of effort: ideally there would be a simpler way. I'll ask on R Core. My guess would be that the new syntax is particularly

Hello all, Would packages using the underscore placeholder with the native pipe need to also depend on R >= 4.2.0? There appear to be a number, modifying Ivan's GitHub search: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Acran+path%3A%2F%5B.%5D%5BRr%5Dd%3F%24%2F+%2F%5Cs%5C%7C%3E%5Cs.*%3D%5Cs%3F_%2F&type=code Regards, Ian ____ Ian Farm Laboratory Manager, The Agroecology Lab University of Maine

On 10.03.2016 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 10/03/2016 8:27 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for >> functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available >> only for the *last* file in the package. >> >> See [1] for a small example package with just two functions f and g in >>

Hi, I have run into a problem with parseData from the utils package.? When an assignment is done with = instead of <-, the information provided by parseData does not include an entry for the assignment. For this input, stored in file "BadPosition.R": y <- 5 foo = 7 And running this code: parsed <- parse("BadPosition.R", keep.source=TRUE) parsedData <-

The fix is now in R-devel, 75386. I have not ported to R-patched, because the fix breaks two packages which are working around this bug (and to my knowledge without having reported it before). So thanks again for the report! Best Tomas On 08/16/2018 10:06 AM, Tomas Kalibera wrote: > Dear Barbara, > > thank you for the report. This is something to be fixed in R - I am > now