similar to: Interaction parameter for split()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Interaction parameter for split()"

2002 Jun 26
0
[kouril: Re: [Fwd: Kerberos buglet in OpenSSH-3.3p1]]
resending to the whole mailing list .. ----- Forwarded message from kouril ----- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:50:14 +0200 To: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Kerberos buglet in OpenSSH-3.3p1] User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1025084114.12959.0.camel at mothra.mindrot.org>; from djm at mindrot.org on Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:35:14PM +1000 On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at
2009 Oct 27
0
anova interaction contrasts: crossing helmert and linear contrasts
I am new to statistics, R, and this list, so apologies in advance for the errors etiquette I am certain to make (in spite of reading the posting guide, help on various commands, etc.). ?Any help is greatly appreciated. Here is my data: fatigue = c(3,2,2,3,2,3,4,3,2,4,5,3,3,2,4,5,4,5,5,6,4,6,9,8,4,3,5,5,6,6,6,7,9,10,12,9) n <- 3 train <- gl(3, 4*n, labels=c("6wks",
2003 Jan 30
1
empty array indexing with dimnames (PR#2507)
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch wrote: > This is a bug that will not often trigger, and only happens for arrays > (but not matrices) ending up with 0 dimensions: The bug is a missing else branch of an if condition at line 431 of subset.c. I don't think the buglets are wrong. You don't drop length 0 dimensions. If you did, the object would be of the wrong length.
2003 Jan 30
0
empty array indexing with dimnames -> erroneous error (PR#2507)
This is a bug that will not often trigger, and only happens for arrays (but not matrices) ending up with 0 dimensions: The following code also shows two 'buglets' (the first even for matrix indexing) where "drop = TRUE/FALSE" is not correctly obeyed. One can argue that since all these arrays have length zero, it shouldn't matter what dimensions they get. [But this
2010 Jul 29
0
[R-pkgs] heplots 0.9-3 and candisc 0.5-18 released to CRAN
I've just released the latest R-Forge versions of heplots 0.9-3 and candisc 0.5-18 to CRAN. They should appear there within a day or two. == heplots The heplots package provides functions for visualizing hypothesis tests in multivariate linear models (MANOVA, multivariate multiple regression, MANCOVA, etc.). They represent sums-of-squares-and-products matrices for linear hypotheses and for
2002 Jun 26
1
[Fwd: Kerberos buglet in OpenSSH-3.3p1]
Can anyone with Heimdal KrbV verify this? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des at ofug.org> Subject: Kerberos buglet in OpenSSH-3.3p1 Date: 25 Jun 2002 14:52:10 +0200 Size: 1291 Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20020626/347e123e/attachment.mht
2005 Apr 08
2
oggzinfo buglet
Conrad, Small buglet with the 0.9.1 liboggz release (go dude!) http://thaumas.net/~giles/xiph/elphel/clips/elphel_00017.ogg causes a float exception in oggzinfo when it tries to calculate the bitrate. It fails to measure the duration and tries to divide by zero. :) There may well be something wrong with the file, although oggz-validate doesn't complain. Also, the configure script
2005 Apr 09
1
Re: oggzinfo buglet
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:14:14PM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:45:08PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > > Conrad, > > > > Small buglet with the 0.9.1 liboggz release (go dude!) > > > > http://thaumas.net/~giles/xiph/elphel/clips/elphel_00017.ogg causes a > > float exception in oggzinfo when it tries to calculate the bitrate. It
2009 Mar 12
1
installed.packages and package info cache buglet (PR#13592)
Looks like there is a buglet in 'installed.packages', around line 17: for (lib in lib.loc) { dest <- file.path(tempdir(), paste("libloc_", URLencode(lib,=20 TRUE), paste(fields, collapse =3D ","), ".rds", sep =3D "")) if (!noCache && file.exists(dest) && file.info(dest)$mtime >=20
2005 Sep 20
0
Fwd: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet
FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack
2001 May 10
0
Buglet in my GSSAPI patches
Just a quick heads up to warn those of you using my gss-keyex patches that there's a small buglet in them which will affect interoperability. I'm building the hash incorrectly (by including a zero length string where there shouldn't be one). This will mean that when trying to interoperate with other implementations (if there are any :-) you'll get a message about the MIC not
2004 Jul 20
0
[PATCH] fix MD5 code buglet
Hello, md5_final() function contains minor buglet, it clears first 4 bytes of md5_context instead of whole structure. Patch attached. Best regards. -- Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net -------------- next part -------------- diff -urpNX /usr/share/dontdiff dovecot-1.0-test28.vanilla/src/lib/md5.c dovecot-1.0-test28/src/lib/md5.c
2020 Nov 16
0
RFC: [SmallVector] Adding SVec<T> and Vec<T> convenience wrappers.
I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in this fairly core/common use case (now we'll have even more vector names to pick from) - can we use default template arguments so we can write SmallVector<T> instead of SmallVector<T, N> and would that address some of the use cases proposed here? I think someone (JYKnight, perhaps) mentioned in the code
2007 Sep 10
2
[Fwd: buglet (?) in de.restore()]
I'm resending this after a decent interval of 20 days -- any opinions? Should I file it as a bug report? Is it my mistake? cheers Ben Bolker -------- Original Message -------- Subject: buglet (?) in de.restore() Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:29:33 -0400 From: Ben Bolker <bolker at zoo.ufl.edu> To: r-devel at r-project.org If one calls data.entry() with a matrix: A =
2017 Apr 24
3
Disable optimization on basic block level
How do you disable optimization for a function? I ask because my application often compiles machine-generated code that results in pathological structures that take a long time to optimize, for little benefit. As an example, if a basic block has over a million instructions in it, then DSE can take a while, as it is O(n^2) in the number of instructions in the block. In my application (at least),
2013 Feb 18
2
quote() vs quote(expr=)
Hi all, I think there's a small buglet in quote: str(quote()) # Error in quote() : 0 arguments passed to 'quote' which requires 1 str(quote(expr = )) # symbol I bring this up because this seems like the most natural way of capturing the "missing" symbol with pure R code, compared to substitute() or bquote() or formals(plot)$x Hadley -- Chief Scientist, RStudio
2007 Apr 26
2
evaluation in unattached namespace
Hi, I recently discovered this buglet in lattice: If lattice is _not_ attached, I get > lattice::dotplot(~1:10) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "bwplot" This happens because of this: > lattice:::dotplot.formula function (x, data = NULL, panel = "panel.dotplot", ...) { ocall <- ccall <- match.call() ccall$data <- data
2010 Aug 14
0
server goes pathological
Ubuntu-10.04, x86, stock. I''m running into a situation where a server goes pathological. Basically, it becomes excruciatingly slow. I can get things through the file system, but a simple file touch can take 6 - 12 hours. Top shows various btrfs processes hard at work - typically 100% of a cpu, (four cpu server), and the machine shows a load of just over 4. Some flush-btrfs, some
2004 Jul 07
3
fast NA elimination ?
dear R wizards: an operation I execute often is the deletion of all observations (in a matrix or data set) that have at least one NA. (I now need this operation for kde2d, because its internal quantile call complains; could this be considered a buglet?) usually, my data sets are small enough for speed not to matter, and there I do not care whether my method is pretty inefficient (ok, I
2007 Aug 29
3
OT: distribution of a pathological random variate
Folks, I wonder if anything could be said about the distribution of a random variate x, where x = N(0,1)/N(0,1) Obviously x is pathological because it could be 0/0. If we exclude this point, so the set is {x/(0/0)}, does x have a well defined distribution? or does it exist a distribution that approximates x. (The case could be generalized of course to N(mu1, sigma1)/N(mu2, sigma2) and one