similar to: file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

Hi, I'm trying to build R on windows and i'm getting the following error when i run the "make all recommended" command: C:/Rtools/mingw_64/bin/windres -F pe-x86-64 -i dllversion.rc -o dllversion.o comm: file 1 is not in sorted order make[4]: *** [Rgraphapp.def] Error 1 make[3]: *** [rlibs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [../../bin/x64/R.dll] Error 2 make[1]: *** [rbuild] Error 2 make:

Ok, moved to R-devel. I tried to build R-2.3.1. Since I intent to distribute this tuned R to all other who have a computer like mine here at work I thought it was best to stay with the latest stable release. About your suggestion, I could'n find xerblas.o file. And I don't know how to edit libf77blas.a. I tried to open it with VIM (http://vim.sf.net/) but there was a lot of strange

Oh, I forgot to mention that besides setting AR, RANLIB and the stack probing fix, you also need a very up to date binutils. 2.25 was out in december. Even with that , if you linker's default is not what you are compiling for (i.e. a multiarch toolchain), you need to set GNUTARGET also, i.e. -m32/-m64 is not enough. Some fix to autodetect non-default targets went in after christmas before the

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Indrajit Sen Gupta <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Avraham, > > I tried with the patched version. The same error message. > > gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -s -mwindows -o R.dll R.def console.o dynload.o > editor.o embeddedR.o extra.o malloc.o opt.o pager.o preferences.o psignal.o > rhome.o rt_complete.o rui.o run.o shext.o

Hi, I tried to compile R-2.10.0 src on 64 bit window. After install Rtools and wingw-w64 compiler and put it the first of my PATH variable, but i got the following error when i tried to compile. Anything I missed? thank you. x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -I../include -I. -I../extra -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D R_DLL_BUILD -O3 -Wall -pedantic -DR_ARCH='"x64"' -c malloc.c -o

I think this is not a R-devel question. Sorry to all if I'm wrong, please let me know. I managed to build R successfully with the default BLAS but when I change the MKRULES to use ATLAS BLAS and set the path to "C:/cygwin/home/Administrador/ATLAS/lib/WinNT_ATHLONSSE2" I got the following error message (I'm posting only the final part, there was a lot of compilation before this):

In the file MkRules.local.in, I see the line: USE_ATLAS = NO which I believe needs to be changed to YES. But how do I specify the BLAS file *libopenblas_haswell-r0.2.20.a *and its location? Regards, Indrajit On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Indrajit Sen Gupta <indrajitsg at gmail.com> wrote: > I was able to compile the R from the github by running build-r-devel.bat! > > Now need

On Thu Jan 9 2014 03:47 Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > This is is an issue that bugged me for a while. I encountered a year > ago (April 2012) when I first tried to build R from source on Windows. > I never figured out what the solution is or if I'm doing something > wrong myself (but I have found a tedious workaround). I'm still on > the same Windows 7 Ultimate machine with

Hello everyone, I'm trying to build R 2.14.0 from source on Win7 x64 using the instructions from "R Installation and Administration" (version 2.13.2), but when I try to make the core files (as of step 3.1.3 of the instructions), it fails with the following error: ... x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -I. -I../../gnuwin32 -I../../include -DGA_DLL_BUILD -DENABLE_NLS=1 ?-O3 -Wall

Hello list, I would like to cross-compile R packages using R 2.4.0. I am working on Linux Debian and cross-compiled (windows binaries) without problems with older R version. I have used the doc of Yan and Rossini in the contributed section of the R documentation (same version of MinGW...). When I try to cross-compile R (make R), the procedure stopped and returns :

Very timely, as this is how I got into the problem I posted about earlier; maybe some of the problems I ran into will mean more to the you and the experts on this thread, Dr. Murdoch.For reference, I run Windows 7 64bit, and I am trying to build a 64 bit version of R-3.1.2. As we discussed offline, Dr. Murdoch, I've been trying to build R using more recent tools than GCC4.6.3 prerelease.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'm just trying to build R under windows, and receive the following error: windres -i dllversion.rc -o dllversion.o comm: file 1 is not in sorted order make[4]: *** [Rgraphapp.def] Error 1 make[3]: *** [rlibs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [../../bin/i386/R.dll] Error 2 make[1]: *** [rbuild] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 I have been working

Dear R People: I'm trying to compile R-2.15.0 on a 64 bit Windows machine. However, I'm getting the following error: c:\R64\R-2.15.0\src\gnuwin32>set TMPDIR=c:\temp set TMPDIR=c:\temp c:\R64\R-2.15.0\src\gnuwin32>make all recommended make all recommended make[1]: `MkRules' is up to date. make[4]: Nothing to be done for `svnonly'. installing C headers make[2]: Nothing to

Hello, I was trying to build R from source on Windows XP. I installed software which are mentioned from the follow web page http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ (Last accessed on Nov. 13th, 2006) . Unfortunately, I got error messages whenever I run 'make all recommended' without modifying 'MkRules' file. I have removed software and reinstalled them several times but I still

I get the following error when building R from the subversion server as well as the latest tarball. I am on Windows XP, and I recently updated my MinGW installation. It's quite possible I am doing something wrong, but I am not sure what that might be. making console.d from console.c making dataentry.d from dataentry.c making dynload.d from dynload.c making edit.d from edit.c making editor.d

Hello! I'm trying to install R-patched from source on a Windows 64 bit laptop. I have installed R-tools 2.16 and set up the jpeg, tiff, and libpng files Here is the output: c:\R64\R-patched\src\gnuwin32>make all recommended make all recommended make[1]: `MkRules' is up to date. make[4]: Nothing to be done for `svnonly'. installing C headers make[2]: Nothing to be done for

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Hin-Tak Leung <htl10 at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > The r.dll crash is easy - you need to be using gcc-ar for ar, and gcc-ranlib for ranlib. I also posted a patch to fix the check failure for stack probing, as lto optimizes away the stack probing code, as it should. > > yes, lto build's speed gain is very impressive. > > I

recently I used gcc 4.9.1 (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains targetting Win64/Personal Builds/mingw-builds/)on windows to build R,but failed when link R.dll ,it report linker status 5.  after some digging, I found when use gcc 4.9.1 64 bit on windows there are lots of .refptr.*(* is r function name) in R.def, which lead build fail.so I add a simple path to

Executive summary: I believe revision 86265 makes it more difficult to build R with OpenBLAS on Windows as now the entire LAPACK needs to be built to obtain zspmv. Is there anything that can be done to allow the former behavior to be used, something in Mkrules.local perhaps? Detailed Explanation: I have been building R with OpenBLAS for Windows 64 for over a decade by patching

I haven't been able to build yesterday's R-devel (or, as a test, R-devel_2005-03-11) on Windows XP. The error message I'm getting is to do with 'arithmetic.c', as shown below. Current R-patched seems to build fine, and I've built previous R-devels from source fairly often in the past-- though I have no understanding whatsoever of what's going on. FWIW the only changes