similar to: .Internal(inspect(x)) gives overly verbose output for reference classes

Dear All, It seems that reference classes consume a lot of memory which became a problem for my rather extensive simulation. I prepared a small example. An instance of this minimal class uses about 20K on disk. rm(list=ls(all=TRUE)); MySmallClass = setRefClass("MySmallClass", fields = list( myField = "numeric" ), methods = list( initialize =

Hi list, is there a way to define some kind of private Variable? I would like to prevent the user from manipulating fields on his own, in order to not destroy data structures. The problem is, that as soon as the variable exists in the environment it is accessible via t$secret_value. test <- setRefClass("test", fields=list( secret = function(value){ cat("the function was

As of rev. 61035 in r-devel, setRefClass() now returns a generator function, as setClass() has done since 2.15.0. The convenient style is now: mEdit <- setRefClass("mEdit",......) xx <- mEdit(data = xMat) instead of xx <- mEdit$new(data = xMat) The returned object still has fields and methods accessible as before. See the "Value" and "Reference Class

Dear list, I have a reference class which should act as a "generic" superclass for other classes. I've read the respective section at ?setRefClass and put the name of the superclass to the 'contains' argument of an example subclass (see class defs below). Classnames are set in a way that shouldn't result in collation issues (virtual def sourced before superclass def

This bug appears intermittently in R CMD check when reference classes have finalize methods. The problem is that garbage collection can be run after the methods package is no longer available. It affects (periodically) the Bioconductor AnnotationDbi package as well as packages that contain Rcpp classes. To reproduce: library(methods) a = setRefClass("A",

Hi all, I've constructed the following function to test whether or not an object was created from a reference class: isRefClassObject <- function(x) isS4(x) && is.environment(attr(x,'.xData')) && exists('.refClassDef',attr(x,'.xData')) but I'm unsure if it's a complete test or if there's a better way to test. Regardless, It would be

Dears, I have a question about copying reference objects using the initialize method. 1) If the latter has no arguments, there is no problem to copy an object. myClass = setRefClass("myClass", fields = list(value = "numeric") ) myClass$methods(initialize = function(...){ ? value <<- 1 ? callSuper(...) }) newObject = myClass$new() newObject$value = 2 copyObject =

Dear John and others, I've been wondering about whether there's any way to indicate a "nil" reference class object, which will represent "no value", and be tested for, but not fail the internal type checking. NULL is the obvious choice (or seems so to me), but can only be used if an explicit class union is created: > Foo <- setRefClass("Foo") > Bar

Is it possible to override the $new(...) in the reference class generator? I have tried adding a "new" method to the methods of the class, but that is obviously not correct. I have also tried adding it to the class generator, but the class generator still uses the default constructor. As a simple example, this is the current interface: TestClass <- setRefClass

I've found that reference class objects tend to behave like plain old environments wrt field access, unless a method on e.g. $<- is explicitly defined. Here is a code snippet: library(methods) Foo <- setRefClass("Foo") foo <- Foo$new() foo$a <- 2 # why does this succeed? not a valid field! ## set a silly $<- method setReplaceMethod("$", "Foo",

Dear list, I'm wondering if the following error I'm getting is a small bug in the Reference Class paradigm or if it makes perfect sense. When you write an explicit initialize method for a Ref Class, can you then make use of '.self' WITHIN this initialize method just as you would once an object of the class has actually been initialized? Because it seems to me that you can not.

Hi all I had written a gdb macro to dump the string representation of an SEXPREC type when I realised everything I needed was in inspect.c already in the typename() function. However, the typename function doesnt handle the RAWSXP type, so if possible, could the following patch be applied (I've just put in inline as it is a trivial 1-liner)? Index: src/main/inspect.c

Hi, I'm trying to create a package that contains reference class definitions from which users can create reference objects, but there seems to be something awry. My toy example creates an empty package via package.skeleton('TestClass') to which I add the following R code: TestClass <- setRefClass('TestClass',fields=c('name')) Unfortunately my R console output

Dear list, is there a shortcut-function to check whether a class is a Reference Class or not? There's something like this for S4 classes ('isS4(object)'), but I couldn't find anything regarding Ref Classes. Currently, I'm doing it this way, which is a bit clumsy: A <- setRefClass("A", fields=list(X="numeric")) a <- A$new() isRefClass <-

I've been trying to use methods for reference classes via the notation "[[...]]" (X[["doSomething"]] rather than X$doSomething), but it failed to work. However, I did find that if you use the usual "$" notation first, "[[...]]" can be used afterwards. The following simple example illustrates the point: > setRefClass("Number", + fields =

Dear list, I think I stumbled across a little bug with respect to the standard initialization routine for Reference Classes. It seems that a field 'self' is treated as if it's name would be '.self' (which we know is reserved for the self reference of the instantiated object itself) and thus an error is thrown. If the field value is assigned in an explicit call after the

> setRefClass("Foo", fields = list()) Error in setRefClass("Foo", fields = list()) : A list argument for fields must have nonempty names for all the fields In my opinion, the above should not fail. There are no fields. Thanks, Michael [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sorry guys, but I chose a really stupid name before (no "reference classes"). Hope it's okay to re-post. Cheers, Janko >>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE <<< Dear list, Is it possible to update or reassign '.self' with an image of '.self' (e.g. a locally stored .Rda file) from within a method? I know that this might sound akward, but here's the use

Dear list, just to make sure that I understand 'unregistering' methods for S4 reference classes correctly: If I registered a method and want to 'unregister' (i.e. remove) this method again, objects/instance created of the respective class still feature the removed method until I do an explicit reassign ('my.instance <- getRefClass("Classname")$new()'), right?

Hi Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the following single code file: newTest <- function() { cl <- get("someClass") cl$new } someClass <- setRefClass("someClass") (This is similar to code actually used in the testthat package.) If methods is not loaded,