similar to: configure-args for R CMD build

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "configure-args for R CMD build"

2010 Apr 26
2
00LOCK and nfs
I am running into a problem with the 00LOCK file and .nfs files. It seemed to be caused by the following R is installed on NFS user A has loaded pkg_A containing a dynamically loaded library user B (the administrator) runs install.packages("pkg_A") as the final part of the installation process the 00LOCK directory is removed this creates a .nfs file because user A has the
2009 Jun 24
2
loadNamespace and useDynLib
I am considering a package with a namespace (Rgraphviz from Bioc). I essentially want to have some error handling for loading the dll, something like wrapping it into tryCatch or similar (reason: see below). Right now I am loading the dynamic libraries by useDynLib in my NAMESPACE file. When I look at the code from loadNamespace, I have the impression that what I want is impossible
2015 Aug 15
1
Why not pthreads on Windows in 'parallel' package?
Aaaah ... and argh - I should have better not to post R question at midnight, especially when I know it forks the process and it's not using threads. Brain meltdown. (So, we'll proceed trying to use pthreads in matrixStats also for Windows). Sorry for the noise and thanks Kasper. Henrik On Aug 15, 2015 02:52, "Kasper Daniel Hansen" <kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> wrote:
2017 May 20
1
test fails when requesting LC_CTYPE
>>>>> Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhansen at gmail.com> >>>>> on Fri, 19 May 2017 20:09:24 -0400 writes: > I rebuilt R with > export LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 > and the test still fail. Surprisingly, when I run R from the bin directory > and execute the test code, it runs without error: >> oloc <-
2017 Oct 04
1
R CMD Rd2pdf and macros
No, I do not get the same as you. I have tested with R-devel and R-patched compiled today. When I do R CMD Rd2pdf mpra I get (as reported a few days ago) Hmm ... looks like a package Converting Rd files to LaTeX Error : mpra/man/mpra-package.Rd:6: file './DESCRIPTION' does not exist whereas you (Kurt) reports that this works on zTree. When I do R CMD Rd2pdf mpra/man I get - a
2017 May 19
2
test fails when requesting LC_CTYPE
On RedHat Enterprise Linux 6, the test below fails (this is using the stock GCC 4.4.7) from R-devel r72707. LC_CTYPE is unset when I run it, but LANG=en_US.UTF-8 It also failed "yesterday" where as far as I recall the test code looked a bit different. Best, Kasper > ## Results differed by platform, but some gave incorrect results on string 10. > > > ## str() on large
2011 May 19
1
r-2.13 fails make check
I am only reporting this because it is the current release branch and not devel. R-2.13 from svn revision 55957 builds fine, but fails make check. This happened with a fresh svn checkout 12 hours ago and it still happens as of now. Two days ago I could build R-2.13 and it passed make check on the same system, so I doubt it is a system problem. But just in case my system details are a fresh
2017 Sep 27
3
possible bug in R CMD Rd2pdf
When I include the macros \packageAuthor, \packageDescription, \packageTitle, \packageMaintainer in a XX-package.Rd file, R CMD Rd2pdf fails with $ R CMD Rd2pdf mpra Hmm ... looks like a package Converting Rd files to LaTeX Error : mpra/man/mpra-package.Rd:6: file './DESCRIPTION' does not exist This does not happen if I comment out 4 occurrences of these 4 macros in mpra-package.Rd.
2020 Oct 02
2
timezone tests and R-devel
Yes, the potential issue I see is that make check fails when I explicitly set TZ. However, I set it to be the same as what the system reports when I login. Details: The system (RHEL) I am working on has $ strings /etc/localtime | tail -n 1 EST5EDT,M3.2.0,M11.1.0 $ date +%Z EDT $ echo $TZ US/Eastern On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:48 AM Sebastian Meyer <seb.meyer at fau.de> wrote: > Thank
2016 Mar 24
3
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
I agree with Kasper, this is a 'big' issue. Does your method of taking only n PCs reduce the load on memory? The new addition to the summary looks like a good idea, but Proportion of Variance as you describe it may be confusing to new users. Am I correct in saying Proportion of variance describes the amount of variance with respect to the number of components the user chooses to show? So
2010 Feb 24
1
build, data and vignettes
Based on some testing it seems to me that if I have a package with a dataset in /data a Sweave vignette in inst/doc (but no associated pdf file) the vignette loads the data in /data through data(dataset) and I do a R CMD build R will try to build the pdf version of the vignette, but will be unable to find the dataset in data because the package is not yet installed. However, if I do
2010 Feb 05
1
Reg: Rgraphviz installation
Hi, Could you guide me to upload Rgraphviz library. I have installed Graphviz 2..20.3.1 , even followed the instructions in Read me, but I cannot load the package. There is a error message "This application has failed to start becaues libcdt-4.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem", whenever we plan to load the package. Thanks in Advance Deepak
2005 Oct 18
1
cross-compiling tools
Hi We have been cross-compiling windows packages under Linux using the excellent Makefile and instructions by Tony Rossini and Jun Yan. Specifically we have been cross-compiling c++ code and it used to work. Now the minGW tools located at www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools have changed from version 4 to version 5, and our cross-compiling have stopped working. Inspecting the tarball we are
2015 Mar 27
2
About removing zlib from R-devel
Related to this question: I have installed bzip2 1.0.6 by hand, but configure still fails. When I look at config.log I get the following configure:34150: /usr/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -L/usr/local/lib64 confte st.c -lbz2 -lz -lrt -ldl -lm >&5 conftest.c: In function 'main': conftest.c:250: warning: initialization discards
2013 Oct 24
1
advise on Depends
This is about the new note Depends: includes the non-default packages: ‘BiocGenerics’ ‘Biobase’ ‘lattice’ ‘reshape’ ‘GenomicRanges’ ‘Biostrings’ ‘bumphunter’ Adding so many packages to the search path is excessive and importing selectively is preferable. Let us say my package A either uses a class B (by producing an object that has B embedded as a slot) from another package or provides a
2016 Mar 25
2
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 10:41 am, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > As I see it, the display showing the first p << n PCs adding up to 100% of the variance is plainly wrong. > > I suspect it comes about via a mental short-circuit: If we try to control p using a tolerance, then that amounts to saying that the remaining PCs are effectively zero-variance, but
2013 Oct 08
1
"Failed to locate the 'texi2pdf' output file"
Just thought I would mention that the issue below (and in https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2013-April/066318.html) is still not resolved. It hasn't been a big problem, but it potentially could be, if a critical package were to have this error on release day, then all its dependencies would fail to build, which would probably require us to postpone our release. See the complete thread
2005 Sep 09
2
C macros and Makevars/package building
Hi We are currently embedding a rather large C++ library in R (BioC), and we want some comments on the portability of how we have approach this. First of, we are not really able to do much about the portability of the basic library, which of course is the main question :) We have an approach which seems to work, I just want a bit of feedback on it.... The way we integrate it into R is
2012 Sep 24
1
license
R-devel now gives a warning for a non-standard license (this may have happened for a while). In Rgraphviz we include the Graphviz source code, which is under Eclipse. But the rest of the R package is under Artistic-2.0 or at least contains code from past contributors which were licensed under Artistic-2.0. The standard licenses does not really give an option for this situation, apart from using
2019 Sep 04
2
possible bug in R's configure check for C++11 features
I am trying to compile R under a new setup, and frankly, I have had a lot of problems, but I think the stuff below points to a possible bug in R's (custom) configure checks for C++11/14/17, but not for C++98. This is a report about R from the R-3-6 branch, with a svn checkout from today, revision r77135. In my case the compiler name is x86_64-conda_cos6-linux-gnu-g++, not g++. I denote this