Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "S4 NAMESPACE method imports and exports do not include (promoted?) generics"
2013 Aug 30
2
"False" warning on "replacing previous import" when re-exporting identical object
Hi,
SETUP:
Consider three packages PkgA, PkgB and PkgC.
PkgA defines a generic function foo() and exports it;
export(foo)
PkgB imports PkgA::foo() and re-exports it;
importFrom(PkgA, foo)
export(foo)
PkgC imports everything from PkgA and PkgB:
imports(PkgA, PkgB)
PROBLEM:
Loading or attaching the namespace of PkgC will generate a warning:
replacing previous import by
2014 Sep 28
1
Using requireNamespace() instead of require()
Suppose I have a function funcA() in package pkgA that requires function funcB() from another package pkgB under certain circumstances. Those circumstances are rare though, so I put package pkgB under 'Suggests', and use this in funcA() when those circumstances do arise:
if (require("pkgB", quietly=TRUE)) {
pkgB::funcB(...)
} else {
stop("Please install package
2015 Jul 03
1
Are downstream dependencies rebuilt when a package is updated on CRAN?
I was wondering: are the downstream dependencies of a package rebuilt
when a package is updated on CRAN? (I'm referring to the binary
packages, of course.)
The reason I ask is because there are cases where this can cause
problems. Suppose that when pkgB is built, it calls
pkgA::makeClosure(), which returns a closure that refers to a function
in pkgA. Suppose this code is in pkgA 1.0:
2009 Aug 17
2
S4 Generics and NAMESPACE : justified warning ?
Dear list,
It seems that a package (pkgB) using another package (pkgA) with S4
generics formed by taking existing functions (for example 'plot') must
not import the existing functions ('plot') in its namespace to avoid
the warning "replacing previous import: plot".
Suppose we use the simple 'import' directive in the name space of
pkgB.
pkgA and pkgB files would
2012 Dec 08
1
namespace S3 and S4 generic imports cannot both be satisfied:
PkgA wishes to write a method for 'unique' on S4 class 'A'. ?Methods indicates
that one should
setGeneric("unique")
setClass("A")
unique.A <- function(x, incomparables=FALSE, ...) {}
setMethod(unique, "A", unique.A)
Both S3 and S4 methods need to be exported in the NAMESPACE
import(methods)
S3method(unique, A)
2011 Dec 15
1
R CMD check fails to warn about undocumented classes and methods
In
> R.version.string
[1] "R Under development (unstable) (2011-12-15 r57901)"
PkgA promotes 'unique' to a generic and exports that
DESCRIPTION:
Imports: methods
R/f.R:
setGeneric("unique")
NAMESPACE:
export(unique)
and PkgB creates and exports a method on unique
DESCRIPTION
Imports: methods, PkgA
R/f.R:
setClass("B",
2011 Oct 15
2
.onLoad failing because could not find function "loadMethod"
Hi,
This strange warning happen sometimes when running 'R CMD check':
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies
... WARNING
Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for ?pkgB?, details:
call: length(new("A"))
error: could not find function "loadMethod"
Error: package/namespace load failed for ?pkgB?
Execution halted
2012 Feb 26
1
improved error message when existing implicit S4 generic is not imported?
pkgA's NAMESPACE has
importFrom(graphics, plot)
exportClasses("A")
exportMethods("plot")
R/foo.R has
setClass("A")
setMethod("plot", "A", function(x, y, ...) {})
During R CMD INSTALL pkgA_1.0.tar.gz we are told
** preparing package for lazy loading
Creating a generic function for 'plot' from package
2014 Nov 15
1
Code tools for identifying which package A functions package B use?
Hi,
I'd like to list all package PkgA functions that another package PkgB
use via Depends or Imports (ignoring Suggests for simplicity). As
long as PkgB uses importFrom("PkgA", ...) it's just a matter of
parsing the NAMESPACE file or inspecting
asNamespace("PkgB")$.__NAMESPACE__.$imports. However, what can be
done in case PkgB uses import("PkgA")? Is there
2020 Feb 14
3
R-3.6.2 make check fails
I am trying to build the latest version of R (3.6.2) on a CentOS system running 7.7.1908.
I have been able to build previous versions of R up to and including 3.5.3 successfully. Starting with 3.6.0
the "make check" step fails with errors relating to "pdflatex" being missing. So, I installed texlive-latex
(and the 100 other rpm dependencies) then tried rebuilding R.
2013 May 08
1
Namespace/inheritance problem in S4 methods for a union class
Hi,
I started this post on bioc-devel but this seems to be more general:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2013-May/004311.html
See reproducible example from Martin below.
Thank you.
Renaud
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Martin Morgan <mtmorgan at fhcrc.org>
Date: 7 May 2013 19:55
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] ExpressionSet and LumiBatch: inheritance problem
in S4
2018 Aug 23
3
[PATCH] Fix error with --uninstall option on SUSE
The `-l` option for some `zypper` subcommands is short for
`--auto-agree-with-licenses` and not available on the `zypper rm` command.
---
customize/customize_run.ml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml
index f92e9a199..3eacdaca0 100644
--- a/customize/customize_run.ml
+++ b/customize/customize_run.ml
@@ -181,7
2018 Aug 23
0
Re: [PATCH] Fix error with --uninstall option on SUSE
Hi Sebastian,
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:45:27 CEST Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> The `-l` option for some `zypper` subcommands is short for
> `--auto-agree-with-licenses` and not available on the `zypper rm` command.
>
No problem with the patch, just one question: can it happen that zypper
may decide to install packages when removing others, e.g. to keep some
other
2012 Nov 30
1
Workarounds to Rd file name conflict when extending a S4 method of some other package
Dear list,
// IN SHORT //
What are possible workarounds to "consolidate" documentation for S4
methods that are scattered across different packages (generic and some
custom methods in one package, additional custom methods in another
package) in a *single* Rd help file while using package 'roxygen2' to
generate the actual Rd files?
// ADDITIONAL INFORMATION //
First of, here
2011 May 19
1
r-2.13 fails make check
I am only reporting this because it is the current release branch and
not devel.
R-2.13 from svn revision 55957 builds fine, but fails make check.
This happened with a fresh svn checkout 12 hours ago and it still
happens as of now. Two days ago I could build R-2.13 and it passed
make check on the same system, so I doubt it is a system problem. But
just in case my system details are a fresh
2016 Feb 10
0
Method from package dependency is not updated due to lazy load?
Hi,
not sure this is a bug or just an unavoidable undesirable side-effect -- or
just me that does not do the right thing.
Consider the code and output below. It creates 2 packages:
* pkgA
* pkgB that creates a method for a generic defined in pkgA
Changes in a method for the generic in pkgA (after re-installing pkgA) are
not reflected in pkgB, unless pkgB is re-installed against the new
2009 Sep 24
1
R v2.10.0: Doc clarification for cross references and where are we heading?
Hi,
in 'Writing R Extensions" of R v2.10.0, under Section
'Cross-references' (2009-09-07) it says:
1. "The markup \link{foo} (usually in the combination
\code{\link{foo}}) produces a hyperlink to the help for foo. Here foo
is a topic, that is the argument of \alias markup in another Rd file
(possibly in another package)."
2. "You can specify a link to a different
2016 Apr 20
3
Fresh build from source of R-3.2.5 failing "make check" under 64-bit Ubuntu
Hi,
Let me justify building R from source. While I can obtain R built for me
under Ubuntu, I tend to build it from scratch as we use a NFS-shared
build as well as shared R libraries for all the bioinfo staff at this
company. Only one build and one set of packages to ensure uniformity
across all workstations.
My problem is that despite using a pretty standard build process, I am
failing at the
2011 Apr 11
1
Conditional "Suggests"
Hi ...
I came across an old post on R-devel that describes a situation very
similar to one I find myself in:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-December/043917.html
As you can see in Gregor's example, the situation is that if I am writing
Pkg A, I want to detect if Pkg B exists - if so use some functionality
from there, otherwise do something else.
To me this reads as being in
2014 Aug 07
2
How to (appropropriately) use require in a package?
Dear All,
What is the preferred way for Package A, to initialize a cluster, and load
Package B on all nodes?
I am writing a package that parallelizes some functions through the use of
a cluster if useRs are on a Windows machine (using parLapply and family).
I also make use of another package in some of my code, so it is necessary
to load the required packages on each slave once the cluster is