Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "IVSHMEM support"
2012 Oct 12
1
Libvirt mpiexec networking issue
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the best place to put this question since I'm not sure
if it's a Libvirt issue but...
I currently have two VMs up with networking and I can successfully ssh to
and from each VM and I have confirmed that I can successfully download
things from the internet. However, when trying to run mpiexec (which uses
ssh), the connection fails and gives me the following
2012 Aug 22
3
Libvirt Seg Fault when compiling either 0.9.13 or 0.10.0-rc1
Hi all,
I am trying to install a version of Libvirt that will be compatible with
qemu-kvm-1.1 but I cannot seem to get Libvirt to compile. During the make
portion of the install I get the following error:
...
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/shawn/libvirt-0.10.0/docs'
Generating 404.html.tmp
/bin/bash: line 5: 59204 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/xsltproc
--stringparam pagename $name
2012 Oct 10
1
Libvirt Error guest wont start
Hi all,
I have been using Libvirt for several months now and I have only had
minimal problems. I had a particular setup and was starting up multiple
guests just fine. However, with seemingly no changes I now get the
following error when trying to start a guest:
virsh start guest0
error: Failed to start domain guest0
error: internal error Process exited while reading console log output:
Supported
2012 Aug 21
1
Libvirt Qemu compatibility
Hi all,
I am using Ubuntu 10.04 Server and I am trying to figure out which versions
of qemu-kvm and libvirt are known to work well together and if there is
anything special that needs to be done during their installs. I am trying
to work with the latest version of libvirt possible that will be stable
with qemu-kvm. Right now, the only configuration I've been able to get
working are the
2012 Aug 23
1
Libvirt daemon segfaults when run as root
Hi all,
For some reason when I run "libvirtd -d" as root it seems to not start. I
investigate by running "libvirtd -v" as root and I get a segfault. Here is
the output:
2012-08-23 19:01:23.237+0000: 27464: info : libvirt version: 0.10.0
> 2012-08-23 19:01:23.237+0000: 27464: error : virDriverLoadModule:78 :
> failed to load module
>
2017 Dec 11
1
Inter Shared Memory ( Ivshmem ) : Cannot Bind
Hello, friends.
I encounter a problem when i use ivshmem with my guest, my ivshmem server is not start, and output a error : Example code, do not use in production ,cannot bind.
Detail distribution:
Today, I know ivshmem from a topic "QEMU version 2.10.93 User Documentation",
Ivshmem: it can create a shared memory that guest device use, so we can use this memory to do something
2014 Jun 13
0
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
> Fine, however Red Hat would also need a way to test ivshmem code, with
> proper quality assurance (that also benefits upstream, of course). With
> ivshmem this is not possible without the out-of-tree packages.
You did not reply to my question: how to get the list of things that
are/will be disabled by Redhat?
About Redhat's QA, I do not care.
About Qemu's QA, I do care ;)
I
2014 Jun 13
0
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
(+merging with Paolo's email because of overlaps)
>> see inline (I am not on all mailing list, please, keep the cc list).
>>
>>> 1. ivshmem code needs work, but has no maintainer
>> See David's contributions:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/358750/
>
> We're grateful for David's patch for qemu-char.c, but this isn't ivshmem
>
2014 Jun 18
0
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 18.06.2014 12:48, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:44:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 17/06/2014 11:03, David Marchand ha scritto:
>>>> Unless someone steps up and maintains ivshmem, I think it
>>>> should be deprecated and dropped from QEMU.
>>>
>>> Then I can maintain
2014 Jun 17
0
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 13/06/2014 15:41, Vincent JARDIN ha scritto:
>> I do repeat this use case that you had removed because vhost-user does
>> not solve it yet:
>>
>>>> - ivshmem -> framework to be generic to have shared memory for many
>>>> use cases (HPC, in-memory-database, a
2013 Jan 04
1
Regarding Ivshmem support
Hi,
I am using virsh 0.9.8 My qemu is 1.0 version.
I would like to use Ivshmem device from virsh command line.
It is possible to use ivshmem device from qemu command line.But its not
working if I am giving -device ivshmem device in xml config file.
Does virsh support ivshmem device.??
--
Mrugani Kurtadikar
Btech IT
College of Engineering, Pune.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML
2014 Jun 13
3
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Il 13/06/2014 15:41, Vincent JARDIN ha scritto:
>> Fine, however Red Hat would also need a way to test ivshmem code, with
>> proper quality assurance (that also benefits upstream, of course). With
>> ivshmem this is not possible without the out-of-tree packages.
>
> You did not reply to my question: how to get the list of things that
> are/will be disabled by Redhat?
I
2014 Jun 13
3
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Il 13/06/2014 15:41, Vincent JARDIN ha scritto:
>> Fine, however Red Hat would also need a way to test ivshmem code, with
>> proper quality assurance (that also benefits upstream, of course). With
>> ivshmem this is not possible without the out-of-tree packages.
>
> You did not reply to my question: how to get the list of things that
> are/will be disabled by Redhat?
I
2014 Jun 12
0
Why I advise against using ivshmem
Markus,
see inline (I am not on all mailing list, please, keep the cc list).
> Sure! The reasons for my dislike range from practical to
> philosophical.
>
> My practical concerns include:
>
> 1. ivshmem code needs work, but has no maintainer
See David's contributions:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/358750/
> 2. There is no libvirt support
One can use qemu
2014 Apr 24
1
Using IVSHMEM with Libvirt
Hi,
I am trying to create a VM with the IVSHMEM feature, and I specify the
device using qemu command line argument in my XML by using the pass through
tag as follows:
<qemu:commandline>
<qemu:arg value='-device
ivshmem,size=2048M,shm=fd:/mnt/huge/map_1:0x0:0x40000000:/dev/zero:0x0:0x3fffc000:/var/run/.ivshmem_metadata_config_2:0x0:0x4000'/>
2014 Jun 13
2
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Il 13/06/2014 11:26, Vincent JARDIN ha scritto:
>> Markus especially referred to parts *outside* QEMU: the server, the
>> uio driver, etc. These out-of-tree, non-packaged parts of ivshmem
>> are one of the reasons why Red Hat has disabled ivshmem in RHEL7.
>
> You made the right choices, these out-of-tree packages are not required.
> You can use QEMU's ivshmem
2014 Jun 13
2
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Il 13/06/2014 11:26, Vincent JARDIN ha scritto:
>> Markus especially referred to parts *outside* QEMU: the server, the
>> uio driver, etc. These out-of-tree, non-packaged parts of ivshmem
>> are one of the reasons why Red Hat has disabled ivshmem in RHEL7.
>
> You made the right choices, these out-of-tree packages are not required.
> You can use QEMU's ivshmem
2014 Jun 17
0
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Il 17/06/2014 11:03, David Marchand ha scritto:
>> Unless someone steps up and maintains ivshmem, I think it should be
>> deprecated and dropped from QEMU.
>
> Then I can maintain ivshmem for QEMU.
> If this is ok, I will send a patch for MAINTAINERS file.
Typically, adding yourself to maintainers is done only after having
proved your ability to be a maintainer. :)
So,
2014 Jun 17
4
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Hello all,
On 06/17/2014 04:54 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> ivshmem has a performance disadvantage for guest-to-host
> communication. Since the shared memory is exposed as PCI BARs, the
> guest has to memcpy into the shared memory.
>
> vhost-user can access guest memory directly and avoid the copy inside the guest.
Actually, you can avoid this memory copy using frameworks like
2014 Jun 17
4
[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
Hello all,
On 06/17/2014 04:54 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> ivshmem has a performance disadvantage for guest-to-host
> communication. Since the shared memory is exposed as PCI BARs, the
> guest has to memcpy into the shared memory.
>
> vhost-user can access guest memory directly and avoid the copy inside the guest.
Actually, you can avoid this memory copy using frameworks like