similar to: Question about --partial-dir and outdated data

Apologies to the list, the title of this thread is completely wrong. It should be something like "Question about --partial-dir and aborted transfers of large files". Let's see if this mailing list program will allow me to change it... -- T.J. On 10 August 2012 15:28, T.J. Crowder <tj at crowdersoftware.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > rsync is a fantastic tool. :-)

OK, I know a lot about unix environments and am very familiar with rsync (and a big fan). My MS windows knowledge is at "I play a doctor on TV" stage. Hmm. OK, the analogy needs work. I know what the words mean and can stumble my way through many common problems. And now I'm trying to use rsync (2.6.3) from the most recent cygwin distribution. It works fine, except that

David, I've used rsync to transfer multiple terabytes when replacing or consolidating storage. The practical limit is not the overall size, but there are a couple that will crop up: 1. This is alluded to in the FAQ, but the relationship between amount of memory on the hosts and the number of files per sync is important. Rsync will use ~100 bytes per file on both the source and

Hi all, (Just because the last reminder is getting buried in spam...) ==> DON''T POST TO THIS GROUP!! <== This group is closing as discussed[1][2]. The archives will remain online. Use the replacement group instead: http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous prototype-scriptaculous-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org If you''re continuing an

Yes, I've read the FAQ, just hoping for a boon... I'm in the process of relocating a large amount of data from one nfs server to another (Network Appliance filers). The process I've been using is to nfs mount both source and destination to a server (solaris8) and simply use rsync -a /source/ /dest . It works great except for the few that have > 10 million files. On these I get

On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Rick Moulton wrote: > It seems that Corel Office 2000 for linux will not run on any version of > wine later that the 1022999 ver.. Seems Any newer version causes an > "ERROR no 6 and stuff about not being able to find "wordperfect" or > quattropro executuables, and also saying it is a wine error. > My question, is there a way to install

The detect-renamed patch is an amazing patch with one problem: It doesn't work when a file is moved to a directory that doesn't exist on the receiving end. In this case it reverts to transferring the entire file. This problem is easily solved by a simple change to the detect-renamed.diff patch in this ticket: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 Any chance this improvement

Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this version???. Best regards

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 02/13/2015 05:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > This is also why the Orange Book and its Rainbow kin exist (Orange Book = > 5200.28-STD, aka DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria). > Should anyone care to learn from the Rainbow Books, they are available from the United States of America (USA)

Hi, A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples: 5.0 5.1 tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10 The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does

Hi, i would like start a Programm but i become this message SECUR32_initNTLMSP ntlm_auth was not found or is outdated. Make sure that ntlm_auth >= 3.x is in your path. how i can fix ist ? I Use debian4.0 Sorry for my band english. Vilsa

Hi there! This HOWTO is outdated: http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/GentooEbuilds x11-base/nouveau-drm from the x11 overlay asks for the 3.2 version of kernel, but the latest version is 3.1.5. This advice is also wrong: "These ebuilds do not have any keyword, as it is usual with cvs/svn/git releases. To be able to install them, you have to mark them with ** in package.keywords."

Yes, that is what I was mentioning. (I did not go through all of them.) There are also some minor alignment issues such as - basic, derived, composite type descriptors (second fields) - subprogram descriptor (Function field) -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:39 AM To: Pan, Wei; Manman Ren Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi folks, I usually use the RSS feed http://rss.gmane.org/messages/complete/gmane.linux.centos.announce to know the centos updates but recently is outdated. Is this temporary? Is there another source? Thanks.

Just upgraded 4.7 to 4.8 stable. Hoped that timezone info will be up to date, but it still isn't though files in /usr/share/zoneinfo show new dates. For instance daylight saving time settings are outdated in Europe/Vilnius file. I'll try to recompile those files from sources got fom ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/ but it would be nice to have updated info for the next release of freebsd or

Dear Sir I been reading through your (?) samba-doc folder on Debian 2.2. The document DOMAIN-CONTROL.txt is dated 1996 and updated 1998. It mentions that SAMBA cannot be a PDC. This is not the case anymore isn't it? Thank you Warwick Chapman (Glenwood 1999) http://www.boatrace.co.za Assistant IT Manager Glenwood High School, Durban, South Africa 031 2055241 083 7797094

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2169 Bug ID: 2169 Summary: command to remove outdated hostkey from known_hosts file wrong Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hi, according to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space the bogons table is outdated... tha attached patch fixes that... (done against 2.0.1) -- Regards Thomas PS. please CC me as I''m not subscribed to the list -------------- next part -------------- --- usr/share/shorewall/bogons.old 2004-04-19 18:28:00.000000000 +0300 +++ usr/share/shorewall/bogons 2004-04-20

Sorry if this is somewhat offtopic, but I''m interested in knowing how many on the list either manage or have dealt with networks in the following address blocks that have been recently assigned by ARIN: 58.0.0.0/24 59.0.0.0/24 69.0.0.0/24 through 72.0.0.0/24 82.0.0.0/24 through 88.0.0.0/24 We have recently changed ISPs and ended up with an address block in the 72.x space, which is

I have a few apps at work that use the msflxgrd.ocx control and have been trying for several years to see if one day it will work with a new release of wine but that day has not yet come. I have finally decided to post to this list about it instead of sitting idle and see if anyone might be able to help find the problem and see how big of a deal it is to fix. I had a developer at work