similar to: Having both R-current and R-devel installed on Ubuntu

Hi Dirk, I too would need to get R-devel on my Ubuntu box (alongside an existing R installation) to check my packages, especially given the mayhem that awaits us when the new `R CMD check --as-cran` goes live. ( http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html ) I was wondering if the script that you posted on r-sig-debian a couple years back was still valid. More however, I'd like to

Hi All: I've been trying to install R-devel on my ubuntu 14.04 machine by following the directions at this link. http://singmann.org/installing-r-devel-on-linux/ The link is extremely clear and detailed but I run into an odd problem. When I run the script at the bottom of this ( which I call build-R-devel ), the following directory structure gets created. :/usr/local/lib/R> dir total 56

Hi! Well, my linux distribution has very recent versions of everything, so a working C++11 compiler exists: $ gcc --version | head -n1 gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20170306 Could wrong ./configure options be at fault here? See: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=r-devel#n40 My sessionInfo(): $ R-devel --slave -e 'sessionInfo()' | head -n3 R Under development (unstable)

On 29 August 2015 at 17:14, Liviu Andronic wrote: | Hi Dirk, | I too would need to get R-devel on my Ubuntu box (alongside an | existing R installation) to check my packages, especially given the | mayhem that awaits us when the new `R CMD check --as-cran` goes live. | ( http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html ) | | I was wondering if the script that you posted on r-sig-debian a

This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence of steps was svn up tools/rsync-recommended ./configure make make check-all |& tee zzz Terry T. Result of ./config R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu Source directory: .

Dear All, I'm trying to implement the section of the manual pertaining to the gcc-ubsan test carried by CRAN on my local computer (ubuntu 14.04): http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/memtests/gcc-UBSAN/README.txt I was wondering whether someone could tell what the minimal version of the gcc tool chain needed to run the gcc-ASAN and gcc-UBSAN alignment tests on ones local

On 19 April 2017 at 12:42, Angerer, Philipp via R-devel wrote: | Well, my linux distribution has very recent versions | of everything, so a working C++11 compiler exists: | | $ gcc --version | head -n1 | gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20170306 | | Could wrong ./configure options be at fault here? See: | | https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=r-devel#n40 | | My sessionInfo(): | | $ R-devel

Below is the output. Thanks for the help. > Sys.getenv() BASH_FUNC_module() () { eval `/cm/local/apps/environment-modules/3.2.10/Modules/$MODULE_VERSION/bin/modulecmd bash $*` } COLUMNS 152 CPATH /cm/shared/apps/uge/8.2.1/include CVS_RSH ssh DISPLAY localhost:10.0 EDITOR

Hi, I have R installed from the Ubuntu PPA and a local build of R (more details below). I will refer to these as "R" and "R-devel", respectively. I've reproduced the following on Ubuntu 13.10 and 14.04. Below is an example (which requires the bootstrap package) that takes 10 seconds for me to run with R-devel and 5 seconds with R library(bootstrap) str(tooth) theta <-

Hello, It has been a while since my last R Devel build, and now I'm running into an issue I'm not sure how to isolate. After updating to the latest SVN sources, and using: ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- tools/rsync-recommended R_PAPERSIZE=letter \ R_BATCHSAVE="--no-save --no-restore" \ R_BROWSER=xdg-open \ LIBnn=lib \

Hello Everyone, After trying several ways to compile R 3.2.2 without luck, I?m reaching out for help. The ?make check? does not hanges for some reason and when trying to install a package it cannot list the download sites (see below). What could be the problem? ./configure --enable-R-shlib --enable-BLAS-shlib hostname = test uname -m = x86_64 uname -r = 2.6.32-573.7.1.el6.x86_64 uname -s =

On 12 November 2016 at 07:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 12 November 2016 at 14:23, Kirill M?ller wrote: | | Thanks. I have now CXX = g++ -std=c++98 in my /etc/R/Makeconf, it's | | picked up properly. I can only assume that the last -std= option wins if | | more than one are given on the same command line [1]. | | Good to know it works. | | I am still a little puzzled why it was

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:29:46 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > On 4 February 2016 at 22:56, Sebastian P. Luque wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It has been a while since my last R Devel build, and now I'm running >> into an issue I'm not sure how to isolate. After updating to the >> latest SVN sources, and using: >> >>

Hello R-devel, Currently on Unix-like systems, Sys.which incorporates the absolute path to the `which` executable, obtained at the configure stage: > ## hopefully configure found [/usr]/bin/which > which <- "@WHICH@" > if (!nzchar(which)) { > warning("'which' was not found on this platform") This poses a problem for the Spack package

Hello, I am trying to build the R-2.11.1 software for university faculty to use in research projects on a DEC/Compaq/HP AlphaServer model GS160 16CPU/64GB memory running Tru64Unix aka OSF1 version 5.1B-5. Is it known whether it is possible to build the R-2.11.1 software on the platform I am using? In my attempts to build the R-2.11.1 software, I first used the native C and Fortran 77/90/95

Does anybody know why two "-g" flags appear in the call to gcc in R CMD SHLIB Example: gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -fpic *-g* -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 *-g* -c c_file1.c -o c_object1.o Surely it need only be listed once? Alan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Summary: The directory /usr/local/lib/R/site-library can be used for site-wide multi-user installations of R. This is even the default on Debian and Ubuntu (following a suggestion by Kurt and Fritz a decade ago over beers -- what could be better). However, R enforces wrong permissions on directories and files there (removing group-write) which effectively defeats this purpose,

Dear list, This is my first time trying to set up the development version of R (R-devel ) in my local machine to test some packages before submitting them to CRAN. I'm using Linux Mint 17.1 64-bit, which is an Ubuntu-based distro. However, I'm not able to correctly set up r-devel, apparently due to a problem with enabling the shared library support. I run the first script given by Dirk

You may want to retry that after a make distclean, in case anything changed in the toolchain. -pd > On 6 Apr 2017, at 14:43 , Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. <therneau at mayo.edu> wrote: > > This run was done this AM on my linux box, and older 32 bit Dell optiplex (core 2 duo). The failure message is at the very end. (It's due to be replaced in a couple of weeks.) The sequence

Hi Dirk and Martyn, > That looks fine. Can you please give a reproducible example of a package > that compiles correctly on R 3.3.3 but not with R 3.4.0 or R-devel. here you go, it?s pretty much the simplest package possible that needs C++11: https://github.com/flying-sheep/cxx11test > Maybe you can share with us how you configure the build of R-devel? Sure, in the mail you quoted, I