similar to: How to build vfs_zfsacl module on Linux platform?

Hello, many linux SW is starting to implement new lzma compresson instrad of old zlib (gzip) od bzip2. lzma is default comrpession in very good compression SW 7-zip, which is faster and have higher compression ratio then bzip2 or rar. Currently its probalby the best compressor in therms of compression and decompression speed / compression ratio. In linux there is GNU lzma SW which implements

Hello, Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs? I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or acl_tdb. Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)? Best regards /Adrian Berlin --

In some spare time, been trying to get Samba 4.10.6-1 working on AIX. Several earlier posts handled by Louis and Rowland. Which were much appreciated and beneficial. Using this stripped (leaving comments out of it) GLOBALS section of smb.conf: [global] workgroup = boost realm = BOOST.COM server string = Samba Server Version %v interfaces = lo eth0

Considering an object with several has_many :through => associations, what is the ''best'' way to handle validations? As an example: class Student < ActiveRecord::Base # some attrbutes like # :name # :grade # relationships has_many :students_assignment, :dependent => :destroy has_many :assignments, :through => :students_assignment has_many

On Sat, July 11, 2020 04:32, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-10 14:47, James B. Byrne wrote: >> FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: > > Can you post the smb.conf of both DCs? > > Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl? Yes. smb.confs DC1 and DC2: /zroot/iocage/jails/smb4-1a/root/usr/local/etc/smb4.conf [root at vhost04 ~ (master)]#

Hi! I have few question to developers of VFS ACL modules (acl_tdb and acl_xattr): 1. Do you plan to extend quantity of entries in acl_tdb (now I can write 22 user ACLs plus CREATOR OWNER, CREATOR GROUP, domain users and everyone) 2. Do you plan to fix few ACLs eg. Traverse folder / Execute file (to traverse I need to enable additional permission List folder / read data to traverse through

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:41 AM Andrew Walker <walker.aj325 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:43 PM Budi Janto via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 9/16/20 2:27 AM, Andrew Walker wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:58 PM Budi Janto via samba >> > <samba at

Hi, I had issues using"vfs objects = acl_xattr" (possibly too old version [Version 4.13.13-Debian] for the needed "acl_xattr:security_acl_name = user.samba" option needed if running in a non-priv container). So I tried "vfs objects = acl_tdb" and found it working. In https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support I found: File systems without xattr support

Hello, When I am using module acl_tdb and I am trying to get access to directory I am getting call trace in log.ip Best regards! /Adrian Berlin =============================================================== [2010/03/24 13:54:05.295901, 0] lib/fault.c:47(fault_report) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 15556 (3.5.1) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO [2010/03/24

Is it me or is my model getting the created_at from the wrong model! I have a HABTM relationship between Problems and Tags. In one of my controller I do the following: def view @tag = Tag.find_by_name @params[:id] end In my view I do this: <% @tag.problems.each do |problem| %> ... <%= problem.created_at %> ... <% end %> Now, how come the created_at

OS platform: FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p25 Filesystem: ZFS Samba version: upgraded from 4.1.17 to 4.1.22 Problem: I have been using the shadow_copy2 and zfsacl VFS modules to enable access control and the Previous Versions feature for Windows clients. With /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf configured this way (excerpt): vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl shadow:snapdir = .zfs/snapshot

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm trying to setup a CTDB-Cluster together with GLusterFS. GlusterFS is running great. CTDB can connect to the gluster-volume. I can store files, using Windows or Linux, and set new acls on the commandline of the cluster. BUT as soon as I try to set permissions via windows it fails with "the request is not supported" I use

> Lets hold off with logs, do you know that if you remove everything > that should be in a share from the [global] part of your smb.conf, you > get left with just '[global]’. The share actually comes from an include file. I made it look like it’s part of the main config for simplicity. > It also doesn't help that everything > that is in [global] is also in the share. It’s

Hi! Does anyone know how many ACLs can be stored on file system (xfs) using acl_xattr module and in file file_ntacls.tdb? Best regards /Adrian Berlin -- You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 250MB of Storage! http://webmail.rock.com/signup/

Hi, I want to use Samba with ZFS volume, although I know 3.0.25c dose not work with ZFS volume. And I found modules/vfs_zfsacl.c on Samba-3.0.26. ( http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_26/source/modules/ ) But I can't find samba-3.0.26.tar.gz on samba.org. So, I have two question. 1. It is possible to download samba-3.0.26.tar.gz (or something another which can use

I'd like to use the zfsacl module now in 3.2.0 (http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_2_0/source/modules/vfs_zfsacl.c?rev=23856&view=log) with 3.0.25a prebuilt on OpenSolaris. Is this possible? If so, will it require building Samba from source or is there a way to use it with the pre-existing binary? -- Pete

I was hoping someone could post, or point me to, a clear set of instructions for compiling Samba 3.5.3 (or even 3.4.8) on Solaris 10. Or even just confirmation that Solaris 3.5.3 really can compile on Solaris 10 with active directory, nsswitch and zfs support. (I notice that Samba and Blastwave versions of Samba 3.4.x do not include zfs and nsswitch support.) I have a consistent issue that I

Hi Rowland, I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. pool/myshare aclinherit restricted default pool/myshare acltype off default So, if you heard that I was going to use

My organization is in the position of having to support full Windows ACLs on CIFS shares. We've been successfully utilizing Samba 3.5.10-125 and vfs_acl_tdb to accomplish that. However, the size of the resulting /var/lib/samba/state/file_ntacls.tdb[.unique-extension] file(s) has introduced some new problems for me to solve. In our environment, it seems on average each stored ACL causes

FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: On Fri, July 10, 2020 02:29, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-09 21:36, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. >> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225485, 'An invalid parameter was >> passed to a service or function.') > > What