similar to: samber server in openvz container - venet oder veth0?

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

Hello All I installed shorewall 3.0.8 on Centos 4.3 with openvz.org kernel it work well i have in this Host 3 virtual servers (VPS) i can access from a VPS to the internet , and with NAt rule (Via Shorewall) i can access from Internet to the 3 VPS. i want that all the 3 VPS can communicate between them. i can''t do a tcp connection from a VPS to an other , in my shorewall log in the

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > Le 06/03/2010 11:43, José Fonseca a écrit : >> >> Attached are two patches with MSVC build enchancements. >> >> They are quite trivial, but were necessary to correctly link LLVM >> libraries with Mesa3D on Windows. >> >> Jose >> > > Are you volontary

Whoops, mailing list headers still broken, sending to the list this time: On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: >> So adding an option for adding this flag would be great but not changing the >> default. (The flag is interesting because it can

Hello, ALL. I am trying to organize a transparent single sign-on concept for my Active Directory users into Dovecot via IMAP. On the user's desktop I use Thunderbird 6.0 as a mail client (MUA), Windows XP as an operating system. Domain is controlled by Windows 2008 Server SP2 with Active Directory. I have installed on my Mail server Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.2 (Squeeze) and Dovecot 2.0.13 from

Hi! Afair, fsync()ing a directory is subject to platform-specific and implementation-defined behaviour, and may either - work as you'd want and (probably) expect - fail with an error - fail silently at least if your application targets more than one operating system/kernel - and even on one and the same platform, different filesystems might exhibit sublty different patterns of behaviour.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > should be fixed with r60590 (work for me) That seems to have fixed a large amount of those errors (nicely simple fix). I went ahead and termserved into my dev box (I will not be able to get to it for another day or so) and told svn to update, and cmake to make into a new directory, and build it, but it

Kenneth Boyd a écrit : > Cédric Venet wrote: >> you never seen assert(0 && "Not yet implemented"); ? >> You may want to compile a program like this :) >> > As I see it, under the proposed extension a compile-time false constant > would error "if the code commits to executing it". > > Heuristically, something like > > void

Hello list, I'm using Samba 3.4.5 on a home-hosted fileserver of mine to easily share files with both GNU/Linux and Windows XP (Professional 32Bit SP3) clients. The machines are connected to each other via a switched GBit ethernet network, the actual available bandwidth between the server and the nodes over TCP amounts to about 940-980MBit (according to iperf). The server's storage

Hi group: I need some help! I use samba 4.5.8 And I mount a samba directory from CentOS 7. When I run such program in the mounted directory: ``` #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> int main() { printf("open aaa\n"); int fd = open("aaa", O_RDONLY |

Hello again, At this school I am working we are setting up a wireless network. What would be the best way to set up the system to this network? How should we log in to Samba? What should I consider. The wireless system has already been purchased by people who have left. Kind regards Anna-Karin

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > > >> David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >>> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >>> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >>> >>> >>> >> You must not have written a

Cédric Venet wrote: >> Technically, yes, but we can reword future standards to have the >> latitude to give compilation errors for conditions that can be proved >> to be false, then the implementation is conforming. We could always >> have a flag to control the behavior if people want/need it, though, I >> can't hardly see why they'd want it to

On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >> >> > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. (Ha!) > You don't have the choice in this case, just

Job Title : Postdoctoral Position in Biostatistics/Bioinformatics Background The joint research unit between bioM?rieux, international leader in in vitro diagnostic, and Hospices Civils de Lyon, second-largest University Hospital Network in France, develops a research program dedicated to the study of injury induced immunosuppression. This program aims at (i) describing and understanding the

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Mikael Lyngvig" <mikael at lyngvig.org> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] An alternate implementation of exceptions Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 09:53:29 +0200 (CEST) Size: 6388 URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090906/ca20be9e/attachment.eml>

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > > I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ > + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. You don't have the choice in this case, just check your STL header. > > FWIW, I've been involved in a couple of attempts by

> Technically, yes, but we can reword future standards to have the > latitude to give compilation errors for conditions that can be proved > to be false, then the implementation is conforming. We could always > have a flag to control the behavior if people want/need it, though, I > can't hardly see why they'd want it to compile if they assert > something that

Thanks cedric, I will look into the ways the debug information could be used. However, it seems like i would have to write a piece of code that would successively reduce the conditional predicate in terms of the local and global variables (of the code). I plan to do it like this. Since i am using a runonBasicblock pass, the context information between two basic blocks cannot be shared, since

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > OvermindDL1 a écrit : >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:52 PM, OvermindDL1