similar to: Performance problem using clustered samba via ctdb

Hello Luc, thanks for your answer. If I understand you correctly than you are using samba4 as windows domaincontroller and you do not have another Windows DC? So after all you have exactly one Kerberos Server that is part of the samba4 server? Thanks Rainer Am 24.03.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Luc Lalonde: > Guten tag Rainer, > > We use our Samba4/Win2k8 AD domain to authenticate all our

Guten tag Rainer, We use our Samba4/Win2k8 AD domain to authenticate all our Linux/Windows/OSX workstations. The home directories are mounted using CIFS in the Windows and OSX clients and NFS4 (krb5) in our Linux labs. Here?s our documentation (french): https://techwiki.gi.polymtl.ca/NFSv4_Kerberos <https://techwiki.gi.polymtl.ca/NFSv4_Kerberos> If Google translate gives you something

Hi, tanks for the answer. Since /proc/<PID>/stack is a stack the topmost element should be the task where it got stuck which is: rwsem_down_write_slowpath which waits for getting a write lock semaphore: cat /proc/10193/stack [<0>] rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x2e2/0x620 [<0>] nfs_rmdir+0x117/0x1b0 [nfs] [<0>] vfs_rmdir+0x7c/0x1b0 [<0>] do_rmdir+0x216/0x230

Hello Micha, we are using the sgid bit (chmod g+s <basedir>) in the base directory to inherit the group of this base-directotry to all new directories/files in it. In the smb share using this base directory you still have to set "inherit permissions=yes" which takes care of inheriting the sgid bit to new sub directories. This way all directories/files have the same group. This

Hallo, thank you very much for your link. Unfortunately I cannot make all files of all our users upper case. This is because all files that are stored on our fileservers for all our about 12000 accounts can be accessed via Samba but also via NFS from linux. Moreover even Users that usually work with Windows, sometimes log in on a Linux machine and want to access their files as well. What I am

Hello, we recently had a big problem with a very high load on our linux (Sles11 SP3) samba server version 3.6.3. We experienced a system load of up to 90 for 300 active samba users. The result was that hardly any user was able to really do anything (eg access a file via samba). One sympton was visible in a very high share of cpu *system* time (about 25% on each of the 10 CPUs). This system load

Am 02.10.2017 um 16:41 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:51:54 +0200 > Rainer Krienke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> .... >> [2017/10/02 11:07:47.046715, 2] >> ../source3/auth/auth.c:315(auth_check_ntlm_password) >> check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [HOSTNAME$] -> >> [HOSTNAME$]

Hello, I try to set up a clustered samba server (on Novell SLES11SP2) based upon CTDB and NFS. My problem is that I do not yet understand the structure of the setup when using NFS. I followed the documentation in http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_Setup#Setting_up_CTDB_for_clustered_NFS As far as I understand this documentation, it should be possible to set up a samba cluster say having 3

Hello, I am searching for a solution that I thought should be kind of standard, but until now I was not successful finding anything. Here is the problem: At our site we offer windows and linux, most servers (eg file, samba, web) are linux based. User data is stored on NFS file servers. Windows systems are part of a Windows domain with an ADS domain controller. At the moment the linux samba

Hello, since a while I experience a strange problem with my samba 4.4.2 running on a SLES12SP2 system. The server does what it is supposed to do, so users can work without any problems and access their files via smb but since some weeks the server shows a strange and unusual very high system load. The samba server is not the domaincrontroller (which is a windows machine) but member of the

Hello, I am running a samba server on a SLES12SP3 machine smb version 4.6.9+git.59.c2cff9cea4c. The samba server offers only the smb service, the file data are stored on separate NFS servers because files are accesses by our users from either linux or windows systems. So a write to this samba server always will read or write files from/to NFS servers. The problem is speed when many very small

Hello, I run a samba server for windows users who access their user data via samba. The samba server is NOT the domaincontroller. This task is performed by a native windows machine. The samba server is running on a pve virtual machine. All data that samba delivers to the windows users are stored on two NFS servers (also VMs) and accessed via an automounted NFS mount for each user on the

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:51:54 +0200 Rainer Krienke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > .... > [2017/10/02 11:07:47.046715, 2] > ../source3/auth/auth.c:315(auth_check_ntlm_password) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [HOSTNAME$] -> > [HOSTNAME$] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER > It looks fairly obvious to me, the Samba

Hello, I have a very odd issue happening, that I hope someone else might be able to give me pointers. I have two different networks running in two different locations, connected by a network vpn. In each network I have a test smb virtual machine. --------- Smb Machine 1: (smbtest1) (remote network) # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.4 (Final) #rpm -qa | grep samba

I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.

All, With the belief that, "given enough eyes all bugs are shallow", I submit the following to the list. I had sent a shorter version to samba-bugs last week, but, given the nature of this problem, I think everyone needs to check this on their own systems. Overview: Pulling files from an NT 4.0 machine to a RedHat 5.0 linux box using 2.0.3 or 2.0.4b smbclient *consistently* results in

jimd@gie.com wrote: > > Overview: > Pulling files from an NT 4.0 machine to a RedHat 5.0 linux box using > 2.0.3 or 2.0.4b smbclient *consistently* results in randomly corrupt > files, with no error message to indicate internal file corruption. We > are able to recreate this problem on all manners of servers and > workstations running NT 4.0, and all manner of linux boxen

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! On a CD-ROM-server at the University Koblenz-Landau we are using Samba (2.0.5a) with Red Hat Linux (6.0, Kernel 2.2.5). The server is located here in Koblenz, but also used from another department of the university at Landau (about 80 miles from Koblenz; they have their own class B network). A traceroute from both locations gave a response time of about 10-50 msec. On

Sorry Suzanne, but for this problem I did not have a solution! The Problem is, that WIN NT, start the Network with the LOGIN - Screen (one of the Security Mechanism). I've you try to enter the network request to the AUTOEXEC.BAT - File, it will not mountd // map one of the drives, because the network isn't start at this time! The next Point you could enter is after the Login - Screen

I am driving a Suse 8.2 linux with cups 1.1.18 and samba 2.2.7a. The problem: The host serves several printers via cups. If some jobs are in one of the queues "lpq -Pprinter" or "lpstat -o printer" shows up the complete listing. Fine. Connected to the same print queue from a Windows (XP/NT/98/2k) box I cannot see the complete listing. Sometimes I see some of the jobs, most of