similar to: Best samba4 network deployment

I have an existing install of Samba4 ( I think beta6 vintage ), which uses ntvfs and bind9. It's only providing AD and Group Policy. I have a seperate file server running 3.6.x. I want to add a server to the domain running the most recent RC. I know they are using internal by default and s3fs for the file shares on sysvol. Can s3fs coexist with ntvfs? Can the internal DNS coexist with

Greetings - On a RHEL6 system, Samba 4.2.1 compiles without any apparent problems but 'make quicktest' reports an error: FAILED (1 failures, 0 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 1 testsuites) A summary with detailed information can be found in: ./st/summary test: running (/usr/bin/perl /var/tmp/samba-4.2.1/selftest/selftest.pl --target=samba --prefix=./st

Hi all, I am in the process of finding the best way to use Samba4 as an AD under FreeBSD and ZFS. The following is based on own research, google, mail archives, a bit of source code etc. So please correct me if I am wrong. 1. ZFS is using NFSv4 ACLs. 2. NFSv4 ACLs are modelled with NTFS (Windows) ACLs in mind. 3. Samba4 started with a new ntvfs file server but that was abandoned (or

I joined a samba 3.5.10 server to a samba4 active directory domain. Windows clients can't browse the root of the servers shares (\\192.168.10.10 ) but they can access the shares if I manually mount them. The following command works on the server that samba 3.5 is running on. smbclient -U administrator -L 127.0.0.1 The following command gives a NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE on a client

I've been trying to run samba4 alpha11 on a FreeBSD 8.1 system as a domain controller but I'm having trouble starting the cldapd server. For some reason it won't bind to the specified address or interface whatever I specify in smb.conf. I managed running the provision script without any trouble but I have no clue how to solve this problem in order to start the samba server. bitrot#

I had 444 errors I didn't want to put them all up here. Maybe I missed a step, maybe it's an easy "oops you forgot to do this" I'm on ubuntu 10.10 amd64 server completely uptodate today. I followed the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO My git is also today. == samba4.rpc.echo on ncacn_ip_tcp with validate and --option=socket:testnonblock=True

Hello to the Samba Mailing List, This is my first post, so please, should I commit any faux pas, nudge me in the right direction and I will adjust accordingly. I'm experiencing a complete failure of the PDC in a Samba 4 AD Domain I've deployed for a client. Samba failed a few days ago and I've been unable to resolve the issue on my own. Google searches are leading me in circles,

./configure --bundled-libraries && make ............ [3638/3880] Linking default/source4/lib/policy/py-policy.so [3639/3880] Linking default/source4/auth/ntlm/libauth4.so [3640/3880] Linking default/source4/ntvfs/libntvfs.so default/source4/ntvfs/sysdep/inotify_1.o: In function `inotify_setup': inotify.c:(.text+0x503): undefined reference to `inotify_init'

Hello, Look like demand for multiple file streams support increased lately. Does samba 3 series intend to support it any time soon? Look like SAMBA 4 is working on it based on the following form Andrew Tridgell: One simple but important example of how the new NTVFS layer helps is the addition of support for "NT file streams." A file in a NT filesystem can have multiple

Hi everyone After almost 2 days up-time with Samba 4, it failed again. This time it simply will not restart. The krb5.conf had got corrupted. I replaced it with this one from /usr/local/samba/private /etc/krb5.conf [libdefaults] default_realm = HH3.SITE dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = true It starts up OK: samba -i -d 3 lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:30:20 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 08:12 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 21:07:48 +1300 > > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a lot of work to change the situation, even more so

Hi all, I am experimenting with samba 4. I have existing data on NTFS partition and want to share them via samba. But I have problems with permissions (ACL). There is an option: ntvfs handler that tells how mapping of permissions between unix and windows world shall behave. But there is lack of documentation. So I tried posix, simiple but in either case I wasnot able to write even set permissions

Thanks a lot for the reference how to make the regtest. One last question please, if understand this correctly, the --use-ntvfs isnot available by default when installing the Debian package, so I need to compile samba with --with-ntvfs-fileserver to make the option available? On 11/14/19 8:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 07:30 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah wrote: >> Hi,

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 07:50:23 +1300 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 11:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 12:11:17 +0100 > > Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > Am 02.12.2016 um 06:55 schrieb Scott

is it possible and how difficult is it, to use LDAP for all the user accounts and groups and password management? would this be something you would want to do? or is it better to stick with samba's initila way of dealing with users? Caleb O'Connell caleb@lincoln.midcoast.com (207)882-7792

Hello, because of the login problem with windows 10 and the required changes in "server max protocol" i try to setup an AD. The AD works fine, now I have an other problem. In my Samba3 install i have the following config: mailserver with standanlone openLDAP <- sync -> samba3 with openLDAP so the mailserver can receive mails even if the pdc is down. as i can see at

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 08:42 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:44:15 +1300 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 22:43 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:07:39 -0500 > > > Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 29,

Hi again, it seems that the configure option (--with-ntvfs-fileserer, --enable-developer) are not available on samba-4.11.2. I get the following error: + --enable-developer --with-ntvfs-fileserver --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --sbindir=/usr/sbin/ --bindir=/usr/bin/ --without-systemd --with-statedir=/var/lib/samba --with-cachedir=/var/cache/samba

We had used Samba 4 alpha 17 for a long time and want to update our server now to Samba 4.0.x. The old Samba versions was using NTVFS and Samba 4.0.x is now using S3FS by default. So, what is the best practice now? Should we stay on NTVFS or should we switch to S3FS? The global part of our smb.conf looks like this: --- [global] interfaces = eth0 netbios name = PDC