Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "patching FC13 kernel with Lustre"
2010 Jul 01
2
configuration error while building lustre , please help !
I am trying to compile lustre like this :
[onkar at localhost build-lustre]$ ./configure
--with-kernel-source-header=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3/include
--with-linux=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
--with-linux-obj=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
--with-linux-config=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type...
2010 Jul 01
2
configuration error while building lustre , please help !
I am trying to compile lustre like this :
[onkar at localhost build-lustre]$ ./configure
--with-kernel-source-header=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3/include
--with-linux=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
--with-linux-obj=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
--with-linux-config=/home/onkar/LUSTRE/linux-2.6.33.3
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type...
2010 Mar 30
15
[Xen-tools] Unable to start xend
[root@localhost onkar]# which xend
/usr/sbin/xend
[root@localhost onkar]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.31.12 #1 SMP Wed Mar 31 09:51:44 IST 2010
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost onkar]# xend start
ERROR Internal error: Could not obtain handle on privileged command
interface (2 = No such file or directory)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/xend",
2010 Mar 30
15
[Xen-tools] Unable to start xend
[root@localhost onkar]# which xend
/usr/sbin/xend
[root@localhost onkar]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.31.12 #1 SMP Wed Mar 31 09:51:44 IST 2010
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost onkar]# xend start
ERROR Internal error: Could not obtain handle on privileged command
interface (2 = No such file or directory)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/xend",
2009 Mar 31
9
Hwo to disable the polling function of mac_srs
In crossbow, each mac_srs has a kernel thread called "mac_rx_srs_poll_ring"
to poll the hardware and crossbow will wakeup this thread to poll packets
from the hardware automatically. Does crossbow provide any method to disable
the polling mechanism, for example disabling the this kernel thread?
Thanks
Zhihui
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2008 Mar 07
11
Issue with Crossbow on VirtualBox
Team,
We are trying to install Crossbow on VirtualBox. Siva first tried it on
Linux and reported it in
Hyderabad Open Solaris User Group alias.
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/hosug/
Today both of us tried it on VirtualBox running on OpenSolaris. Both
attempts have the same results.
a. Selecting Solaris Developer Express during boot process exits the
installation. See this picture:
2011 Sep 28
1
Using febootstrap , please help
Hello,
I am new to febootstrap. I am struggling to install fedora 14 on
disk.img (formatted with ext4fs) mounted on
/mnt/temp . How to use febootstrap to do this ? Does it require any yum
configuration ? I searched the web for documentation on this , but
nothing is clearly mentioned. Please anyone tell me how to do this.
I am doing this on Fedora 14 host.
-- Onkar
2009 Jan 10
3
ALOM woes
Hi.
After running with the crossbow bits for a while, I discovered that the network
management port on my T1000 wasn''t working properly (no link light). When
logging in on the serial management port and running "resetsc", I got this:
--->8---
ALOM POST 1.0
Dual Port Memory Test, PASSED.
TTY External - Internal Loopback Test
TTY External - Internal Loopback Test, PASSED.
2011 Mar 12
1
libvirt configuration problem
Hi ,
I am getting errors while configuring libvirt to compile it from source.
There is a error in libnl
checking for UDEV... no
checking whether to compile with macvtap support... yes
checking whether to compile with virtual port support... no
checking for LIBNL... no
configure: error: libnl-devel >= 1.1 is required for macvtap support
I have already installed the libnl library in /lib/
2010 May 18
2
Framebuffer support in dom0
Greetings!
I have installed xen-4.0 with kernel 2.6.32 on a gentoo box.
Everything works perfectly, except one tiny detail.
I do not have X installed on the machine, so I configured the (old,
non-xen) kernel to use a framebuffer, so that I don''t have to cope
with the ugly 80x25 resolution, especially on a 19" display.
Unfortunately, with the xen kernel, dom0 now uses the 80x25 mode
2009 Mar 28
4
mac_srs_rx_poll_ring thread never stop polling hardware in kernel
Recently I found that the mac_srs_rx_poll_ring thread may never stop in
kernel, please see the following mpstat, cpu 2 is in 100% kernel usage, but
no syscalls and no interrupts.
CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt
idl
0 0 0 0 300 100 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 100
1 14 0 0 134 68 134 1
2009 Feb 16
3
Finishing up the contributors list as well
Guys,
OK, now that we have the new core contributors squared away, we
can go back to finishing the contributors list.
There were some people who got added and then there is existing
contributors list. I think Darren''s suggestion to wait to add new
core contributors is fine (let the new constitution settle down
and we can in the meanwhile have a more inclusive look at both
rather than
2008 May 07
7
questions from a 10GbE driver author
Hi,
I maintain a driver for a 10GbE nic which supports multiple hardware tx/rx rings. We can steer rx packets into rings using the "standard" NDIS6 Toeplitz hashing on TCP port numbers, IP addresses, etc. We can also steer packets based on MAC address. Would this NIC be considered to be capable of supporting crossbow?
Also, can crossbow do things like steer outgoing packets to the
2007 Jun 15
3
questions about tx rings...
I''ve been thinking about hardware that has multiple transmit rings ("tx
resources").
We really should have a way to expose this up to the stack. And
ideally, the stack should guarantee that a given flow will always be
sent down using the same hardware tx resource.
I''ve heard that crossbow will deliver this, but I can''t find evidence of
it in the crossbow
2010 Aug 04
1
Blktap-control under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64
1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64
Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13
[root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a
Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c
2010 Jul 01
6
best practice for lustre clustre startup
Hello,
I have recently installed a lustre cluster which is in a test phase
now but will potentially be in 24x7 production if its accepted.
I would like input from the list on what the recommendations/best
practices are for configuration of a lustre cluster startup.
Is it advisable to have lustre on the various server pieces
(mgs/mdt/oss''s) start automatically? If not why not?
2009 Apr 10
13
property parsing in dladm
I decided to take a stab at
6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options
along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into
dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called
from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the
expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions.
What happened here? Why do we pass in
2006 Oct 01
1
Crossbow and zones
Howdy,
I just finished reading through the Crossbow presentation:
http://blogs.sun.com/sunay/resource/crossbow.pdf
And have one question. If you create a virtual NIC with dladm:
$ dladm create-vnic -d bge0 -m 0:1:2:3:4:5 -b 10000 1
Can you then add vnic1 directly to the zone? e.g.:
zonecfg -z zone1
zonecfg:zone1> create
zonecfg:zone1> set zonepath=/zones/zone1
zonecfg:zone1> add net
2009 Jan 15
1
virtual switch with more than one phyical nic?
Hi. Can a virtual switch have more than one physical NIC?
Or, can a VNIC have more than one NIC? (this is the same
question, I think)?
emike
2009 Apr 08
2
maxbw minimum
The minimum is set at 1200Kbits/second. However, in testing, if I set
that for a VNIC, the domU gets no traffic at all (maybe the occassional
packet). Is the minimum too low?
If I set a maximum of 2000Kbits/second, I get this from nicstat
(expecting around 250Kbytes/s total:
Time Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat
04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0