similar to: Bind9 Error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Bind9 Error"

2020 Oct 12
4
BIND9 failing
I am working towards joining my second DC to the first. If I am understanding: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory correctly I am to get bind9 working properly before the join should happen. I am getting this: > root at dc2:~# systemctl status bind9 > > ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server > > Loaded: loaded
2014 Apr 25
1
Moving to Bind from internal Ubuntu Server
Hello I'm trying to move to Bind from internal DNS. Internal DNS sometimes does not answer for clients with forwarded from another one records. It serves only local addreses when there is high traffic. When i start bind is see some errors: ----------------------------------- Apr 25 13:50:35 PrimaryDC named[7726]: sizing zone task pool based on 5 zones Apr 25 13:50:35 PrimaryDC
2013 Sep 11
3
Bind9 AD SDLZ driver failed to load
I installed Bind9 on a new ubuntu 13.04 server using apt-get install bind9 and am trying to integrate AD into it. Bind starts fine and will resolve my domain and computer names, but when I add the line include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf" into /etc/bind/named.conf, Bind9 fails to start. I have edited that file to ensure the correct line is included for Bind 9.9, and I am not
2015 Sep 03
2
samba_dlz: Failed to connect
On 09/03/2015 01:48 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 03/09/15 18:38, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't >> include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: >> >> Sep 03 13:31:57 homebase.home.htt named[21920]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' >> using driver dlopen >> Sep 03 13:31:58
2016 Sep 29
1
CentOS 6.8 named won't start after upgrade
Ugh, I was upgrading the AD server running on a CentOS 6.8 which uses named as its back-end. I have been running it for years with no problems. Today after upgrading bind named will not start. I get this error: Sep 28 23:32:25 nikita named[6369]: ---------------------------------------------------- Sep 28 23:32:25 nikita named[6369]: BIND 9 is maintained by Internet Systems Consortium, Sep 28
2015 Sep 03
1
samba_dlz: Failed to connect
On 09/03/2015 02:12 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 03/09/15 19:01, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 01:48 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 03/09/15 18:38, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> Progress on dns_dlz. At least I got things loading. If I don't >>>> include the dlz info bind starts, but if I do I get: >>>>
2016 Oct 16
0
bind9 won't run
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with > Bind9_DLZ. > > I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software > setup. First machine is working fine. > > At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other
2019 Jul 22
4
errors restoring samba
Hi Rowland, I've decided to roll back samba on DC1 to the state from a couple of weeks ago, before I started all this mess... Since the email subject change :) Stopped bind9 and sernet-samba-ad and copied /var/lib/samba aside. Restored samba folder from backup, started sernet-samba-ad but bind9 fails to start: Jul 22 14:39:39 dc1 named[27846]: generating session key for dynamic DNS Jul
2019 May 04
0
Issues with bind9 dlz
On Sun, 5 May 2019 00:11:40 +1000 Rob Thoman via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. > The DNS backend is DLZ > > We are seeing DNS issues as per below > > When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can > resolve the hostname(itself) > > added interface
2018 May 10
2
Bind_DLZ krb errors @ startup.
Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND
2016 Oct 16
1
bind9 won't run
On 2016-10-16 12:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with >> Bind9_DLZ. >> >> I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software >> setup. First machine is
2019 May 05
1
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland, The samba-tool dns zonelist 127.0.0.1 -U Administrator%xxxxxxxxxx | grep 'pszZoneName', gives Using binding ncacn_ip_tcp:127.0.0.1[,sign] Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 135 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 1024 added interface
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi, We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. The DNS backend is DLZ We are seeing DNS issues as per below When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can resolve the hostname(itself) added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.117.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 IPs: ['192.168.117.10'] need cache add: A server5.intdom.group 192.168.117.10
2011 Feb 06
0
bind9 dlopen/dlz problems
Hi, I'm trying to replace my current samba4/bind setup with Tridge's new DLZ bind method (s. http://blog.tridgell.net/?p=122). Instructions about how to set this up seem a little rare right now, and I'm not even sure wether this is supposed to work at all in its current state (but I'll give it a try anyway :-) What I found so far: In order to use the new dlopen DLZ you'll
2016 Oct 16
2
bind9 won't run
I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with Bind9_DLZ. I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software setup. First machine is working fine. At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other (until I get Bind running.) I have searched log complaints. Compared settings between the two machines and despite bind running on the first one,
2015 Mar 19
5
Dynamic DNS Updates not working. samba_dnsupdate : RuntimeError: (sambalist: to exclusive) kinit for [DC@Realm] failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)
Good morning! First of all thanks Rowland for the fast answer yesterday! I realized that samba-technical might have been the wrong mailing list and switched it to the normal samba users list (hopefully it worked, as it does get a bit confusing with spamgourmets sendto addresses!). Unfortunately the problem with samba_dnsupdate remains after the changes. I did changed the smb.conf, krb5.conf, and
2011 Dec 03
1
samba 4 named. dlz_bind9.so not found
Hi everyone openSUSE 12.1 samba Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-30d4484 Following the wiki instructions for Samba 4, I added include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; to /etc/named.conf (the last line) The logs give: 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland, Thank you. I think the 5 zones maybe a parsing issues somewhere. Also, the realms are in capital, must have been a typo. The UFW has been disabled and selinux is in a disbaled state /etc/bind/named.conf.options has options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want // to talk to, you may need to
2013 Jun 07
2
samba4+bind on centos
Hi all I've given up on the idea that I can make a script to import our <domain>-zone into samba internal dns with samba-tool as it gets really messy with subdomains. Instead I'm now trying to get samba4 to let bind handle the <domain>-zone as well als dynamic updates and such. The problem is that once I've started named and samba4 after provisioning, I try to test
2012 Feb 04
1
Samba4: Incorrect version of dlz_bind9.so
Hi list! I follow the Samba 4 HOWTO on Ubuntu 10.04, git ok make ok make install ok make ok (needed for provision to work, even though i use the installed provision) /usr/local/samba/sbin/provision --realm=samdom.example.com --domain=SAMDOM --adminpass=SOMEPASSWORD --server-role='domain controller' ok added "domain samdom.example.com" to resolv.conf When starting Bind 9.9.0b1