similar to: acl_tdb failed to convert file acl to posix permisions

Hello, I have been using a very simple rbind approach (simple enough for me to understand) to combine data files within R. It seems to work fine, but then generates warning messages for reasons that I can't begin to understand. The text below shows the issue. testread12=read.table("C:/Files/Test100.txt", head = T) testread11=read.table("C:/Files/Test101.txt", head =

I've been wrestling with a problem on newer versions of samba with a configuration that "used" to work in samba 3.0.33 (RedHat Enterpise 5 packages) This maybe due to changes in the may samba maps NT permissions, but i'm not sure so I thought I would ask. I have a samba 3.3.8 (RedHat Enterprise 5.5 Samba3x packages) and samba 3.4.4 (Redhat Enterprise 6 beta packages)

Hi Everyone, I have a really huge trouble with the Acls under windows 7. I use filesystem's acls under samba and it works correctly under windows xp, but it does not in w7. I am not sure if it is a kind of bug, the case is last week I upgraded my samba 3.0 to 3.5 and my acls under w7 worked fine. Now the problem I have is if a directory is set for example with the grup 'company' and

On Ubuntu, I have upgraded to the latest LTS version, which upgraded my Samba to 3.6.3 and now getting NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED when trying to remove files and folders. This server MEDIA is setup as a member server to a FreeBSD PDC called MAIL using LDAP for authentication. All been working great for a long time, now from the PDC, I try.... mail# smbclient -U robert //media/robert WARNING: The

All, Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based write permissions. On 4.5.x, 4.4.x, and 4.3.x that permission is not being honored. I would be incredibly

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > All, > > Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at > my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've > replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old > 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based > write

On 11/14/16 6:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: >> All, >> >> Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at >> my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've >> replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old >>

On 11/15/16 7:25 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > The token is the list of uids/gids (or SIDs in Windows terms) > that this smbd is using to represent the user right now. Okay - that makes sense. Thank you. >> >> canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-22-1-0 uid 0 (root) >> SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx >> canon_ace index 1. Type = allow SID =

On 11/17/16 2:17 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:25:24PM -0500, Josh Malone wrote: >> >> http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~jmalone/sambalog.txt > > Looking at that log I see: > > posix_get_nt_acl: called for file . > > canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-22-1-0 uid 0 (root) SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx > canon_ace index 1.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:25:24PM -0500, Josh Malone wrote: > On 11/16/16 3:17 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:12:06PM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > >>On 11/16/16 2:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > >>>> > >>>>But the file is not root:root - it's owned by uid 12477 and group > >>>>9006. Why

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:44:35AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > On 11/15/16 7:25 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > >The token is the list of uids/gids (or SIDs in Windows terms) > >that this smbd is using to represent the user right now. > > Okay - that makes sense. Thank you. > > >> > >> canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-22-1-0 uid

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:42:45AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > On 11/14/16 6:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > >>All, > >> > >>Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at > >>my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem.

Hello,   I installed a samba server v 4.6.6, I use samba in classic mode (in /etc/default/sernet-samba). Samba is a member of a Windows server 2003 R2 domain.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset = 850 unix charset = UTF-8 interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = true workgroup = MYREALM passdb backend =

I spent the last 5 hours or so updating my imaptest tool. It's beginning to become almost like a real IMAP client. http://dovecot.org/tools/imaptest10.c contains a version that compiles against Dovecot v1.0 (instead of against CVS HEAD). imaptest is this tool that I've been using for a few years to do stress testing. It can create a lot of dummy IMAP client connections which execute some

Hello, Yes I wrote a mistike its not v4.6.6 but 4.6.5. For "unix password sync = yes" it is an old parameters, it was ten years ago an sftp server was installed with samba server. Currently there is no ftp server. Here is the AD object with RID 7022 objectClass: top objectClass: group cn: FREDGROUP member: CN=fpt,CN=Users,DC=cogesys,DC=com distinguishedName:

AIX 5.2, Samba 3.0.11, OpenLDAP 2.2.23. Can someone explain what reduce name is supposed to be checking? The final debug uses "p" as the "reduced" name, but p is NULL to start and only has a value during the code path IF there was no entry found on the first call to realpath at which point the last component is removed and we try again. Now since p points to the character

Hello, How to manage acl from command line when using acl_tdb module?

Hello all I am now experimenting with samba 3.3.0 and acl_xattr. I can see that there is another method of storing Windows ACLs: acl_tdb. Can someone here tell me something about the relative merits and demerits of those two methods? I am using CenttOS with an ext3 filesystem. Thank you!

Hello, What is simplest way to backup/restore acl's if using acl_tdb module? Thanks.

Hi, i have a running samba+ctdb installation with samba as a domain-member. everything works but the acl's. The users want to be able to set permissions on the share. glusterfs does not support extended acls, so i am using acl_xattr. xattr is installed and i can manually set attributes using setfattr on the shared-directory. if i try to set the permissions using a winxp client i'll get a