Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "FreeBSD-SA-99:01: BSD File Flags and Programming Techniques"
2003 Nov 30
0
FreeBSD mknod refuses to create pipes and fifos
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: FreeBSD mknod refuses to create pipes and fifos
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: kern
>Class: change-request
>Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD zeus.faperj.br 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #3: Sat Oct 25 17:54:52 BRST
1998 Mar 12
2
FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-98:02.mmap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-98:02 Security Advisory
FreeBSD, Inc.
Topic: security compromise via mmap
Category: core
Module: kernel
Announced: 1998-03-12
Affects:
1999 Sep 15
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-99:04.core
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-99:04 Security Advisory
FreeBSD, Inc.
Topic: Coredumps and symbolic links
Category: core
Module: kernel
Announced: 1999-09-15
Affects:
2003 Jun 11
1
nfs panic with umount -f
Hi Ian and others,
umount(8) -f does crash here on several just updated 4.8STABLE
boxes for nfs volumes. Server is an IRIX server. All clients are FreeBSD.
Here is a backtrace:
#0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1 0xc021f1c0 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
#2 0xc021f60d in panic (fmt=0xc03bd664 "from debugger")
at
2007 Sep 03
1
Code/comment mismatch in delegated administration code.
In zfs_mount() function, when we process a mount by a regular user
through the delegated administration, the comment states:
/*
* Make sure user is the owner of the mount point
* or has sufficient privileges.
*/
This makes sense, but the code doesn''t match the comment. The code
ensures that user is the owner of the mount point _and_ can write to the
directory.
Or does "has
2003 Apr 11
14
PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates
Here's a patch against 4.8-RELEASE kernel that allows disk writes on
softupdates-enabled filesystems to be delayed for (theoretically)
arbitrarily long periods of time. The motivation for such updating
policy is surprisingly not purely suicidal - it can allow disks on
laptops to spin down immediately after I/O operations and stay idle for
longer periods of time, thus saving considerable amount
2003 Apr 22
0
kmem_map too small: 260046848 total allocated
After about a day and a half or so of uptime, I'm getting the
aforementioned panic on the server ... better then having it hang solid,
but right now I'm not sure if this is replacing it, or just one being
triggered earlier then the other ...
First scan through Google, I came across some posts talking about
NMBCLUSTERS ... since its at the same settings as my other server (the
default)
2003 Jul 01
2
Okay, looks like I might have a *good* one here ... inode hang
neptune# ps -M vmcore.1 -N kernel.debug -axl | grep inode | wc -l
961
and I have a vmcore to work on here !! :)
(kgdb) proc 99643
(kgdb) bt
#0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119
#1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a4ef600, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:479
#2 0x80141507 in acquire (lkp=0x8a4ef600, extflags=16777280,
2003 Jun 30
0
sysctl_out_proc() race in stable w/ patch
There is a rather serious race with copyout() and process termination
in -stable. sysctl_kern_proc() loops through the allproc list writing
the results to user memory. If it stalls during the copyout (e.g. the
user memory has to take a vm_fault) and the process is ripped out from
under it it will go looping into never never land.
The solution is very simple, simply
2003 Jul 02
0
union_lookup panics ...
grep union /var/log/messages
Jul 2 12:53:01 jupiter savecore: reboot after panic: union_lookup returning . (0xc68e9e90) not same as startdir (0xc5e062c0)
Jul 2 14:35:07 jupiter savecore: reboot after panic: union_lookup returning . (0xbf6fee90) not same as startdir (0xbb6d58c0)
had two of them today, dumping nice cores ... I'm suspecting its someone
trying to remove a file that is
2003 Aug 19
0
inode deadlock: can't reclaim VLRU: suggestions please [was RE: k ernel deadlock]
For FreeBSD 4.7
I've discovered the cause of the deadlock, but I can't figure out how to fix
it.
See below for traces.
If the vnode limit has been reached, the vnlru process is kicked
and the requestor goes to sleep to wait for the vnlru process to
signal that vnodes are available (10% of the vnodes need to be
freed).
Under our test, none of the nodes meet the criteria for freeing,
2014 Feb 05
0
[PATCH] drm/nv50/graph: update status enum names
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
This syncs it up with what's in envytools. Some of the names are a bit
different, but I'm inclined to trust envytools as the correct thing.
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c | 29 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git
2013 Sep 27
1
lock order reversal in 10-alpha2
After booting from a 10-alpha2 disk I am seeing "lock order reversal"
messages show up from time to time. Current logs have 35 entries.
The machine normally is running 9.1 from zfs root and I have setup a
separate disk (eSATA case connected through backplane port to onboard
SATA port) that I have installed 10-alpha amd64 onto a ufs partition to
test port building with. I started by
2013 Sep 12
1
9.2-RC1 panic at shutdown
Hello folks,
I have a panic at shutdown related to FUSE.
#0 doadump (textdump=<value optimized out>) at pcpu.h:234
234 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) bt full
#0 doadump (textdump=<value optimized out>) at pcpu.h:234
No locals.
#1 0xffffffff8090d9a6 in kern_reboot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:449
_ep = (struct
2003 Jul 29
1
kern/53717: 4.8-RELEASE kernel panic (page fault)
Some more crashes of 4.8-RELEASE.
Lets see what do I have today:
# ls -l /var/crash
total 1576676
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jul 30 13:31 bounds
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jun 25 17:30 kernel.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 4 00:08 kernel.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 15 19:28 kernel.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 16 17:50 kernel.3
2009 Apr 27
0
7.2RC2 panic in drm_open_helper on amd64
[ Normally I'd have replied to the original email but I couldn't
figure out a way to subscribe to a list, and then reply to an email
already posted to the list.]
I have this very problem (with a different card):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-April/049618.html
It looks like drm_open_helper() gets a NULL dev parameter and a panic
occurs when it attempts to set
2003 Jun 17
2
System panic (mpd related?)
Getting the following panic on a new Dell Poweredge 1650. This machine is
going to be a VPN server and has a large number of pptp links configured.
The machine is stable if mpd is not running.
(kgdb) where
#0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1 0xc0229a0f in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
#2 0xc0229e4d in panic (fmt=0xc042876c "%s") at
2003 Jun 23
1
Processes hung in 'inode' state ...
Not sure what all to do, but doing a 'gdb -k kernel.debug /dev/mem', a
backtrack on one of the processes shows ... server has been up 12 days
now, and running a June 8th kernel ...
#0 0x20f4f0 in ?? ()
(kgdb) proc 67258
(kgdb) bt
#0 mi_switch () at machine/globals.h:119
#1 0x8014a1f9 in tsleep (ident=0x8a3d2200, priority=8, wmesg=0x80263d4a "inode", timo=0) at
2003 Jun 12
0
panic possibly related to soft updates? (4.8-STABLE, Jun 12 2003)
Hello list,
I have been fighting this problem for a few days now. I have changed memory
and opened the case and monitored for heat. I have been getting the same
panic about every 12 to 24 hours. I can let the system sit idle, or run it
under a heavy load (cpu and disk), but the panics dont seem to be related to
system load. It looks to me like a dangling pointer in
softdep_update_inodeblock,
2003 Sep 29
4
panics on 24 hour boundaries
Hi stable, nice you see you again. I was one of those guys who was seeing
constand panics on 24 hour boundaries but couldn't provide a backtrace due
to the ar device not taking a dump. I installed a dedicated drive just to
take the dump, and then didn't have a panic for a couple weeks. Now, I am
back with, and I have traces to share.
The first two, from 2003-09-27 and 2003-09-28