similar to: complexity of operations in R

Dear R users, I am currently trying to create my first personnal function and use it with the apply function. The purpose of this function is to create a vector summarizing the number of levels in a given selection of data.frame columns. I tried to transpose the indexation method used by the nlevels function but it doesn't seem to work. I did not find anything uesful in the archives so

Buen día a todos el problema que tengo es el siguiente: tengo una matriz 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 7 2 9 0 1 necesito hacer el primer conteo de números hasta que encuentre el primer cero. para la fila 1: tiene 1 y 5 son dos elementos fila 2: solo tiene 1 elemento fila 3: tiene 1 fila 4: 1 y 6 dos elementos fila 5: no tiene elementos distintos de

Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber Version: R-devel_2005-03-10 OS: alphaev68-dec-osf4.0f Submission from: (NULL) (62.253.128.15) This report concerns allocation of large (>2^31 byte) chunks of memory with R_alloc. I suspect it is a bug/typo but please don't hate me if it's actually a feature: In R, I can happily create large matrices: > a= matrix(0, nrow=191481, ncol=3063) > dim(a) [1]

I want to write a little stand-alone C program that calls R_alloc, but I get a segmentation fault: int main(int argc, char** argv){ double* d = (double *)R_alloc(2, sizeof(double)); // <- segmentation fault! return 0; } gdb reveals that sizeof(double) evaluated to 0: > R_alloc (nelem=2, eltsize=0) at memory.c:1649 so it results in the segfault later. This is how I compile my

The bulk is on my forums - the final post for today is: Results to date: A. It looks like I am going to need a newer compiler for C - xlc/xlC V11 apparently does not understand this code: "/data/prj/cran/R-3.2.3/src/main/memory.c", line 2149.31: 1506-046 (S) Syntax error. I will have to check if R-devel has different code before asking for assistence. +2139 #ifdef

I probably should've used boolean terms in addition to numeric values when indexing, but currently I have a set of numeric values[1] and trying to avoid having to reindex ~250GB DBs (and asking numerous users to do the same). Say I have a bunch of values which I want to filter a query against. If I had boolean terms, it could just OP_OR against the whole set. IOW, this is what notmuch does

Hi, I'm trying to construct a legend which has four lines of text and associated symbols. The first two symbols need to be normal lines which vary only in colour. The second two symbols should have filled boxes. How do I suppress the fill boxes in the first two lines? J.

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

I would be "pleased" if you would try packages - i.e., none of "Toolbox" or Perzl rpm's. The iconv I supply might not be working as is (I will need to install a new system to check). However, this is why I have been testing with R-3.2.3 - to side-step the system library dependencies. re: xz - I have "installp" version - and any of my packages should work

Hi everyone! I think I stumbled over a bug in the latest R 2.9.2 patched for OS X: > R version 2.9.2 Patched (2009-09-24 r49861) > i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 When I try to sort latin1-encoded character vectors, R sometimes crashes with a segmentation fault. I'm running OS X 10.5.8 and have observed this behaviour both with the i386 and x86_64 builds, in the R.app GUI as well as on

Hi all, Here''s a work in progress series whcih does a partial revert of the previous swiotlb changes, and does a partial replacement with Becky Bruce''s series. The most important difference is Becky''s use of phys_addr_t rather than page+offset to represent arbitrary pages. This turns out to be simpler. I didn''t replicate the map_single_page changes, since

The Rprofmem facility is currently enabled only if the configuration option --enable-memory-profiling is used. However, the overhead of having it enabled is negligible when profiling is not actually being done, and can easily be made even smaller. So I think it ought to be enabled all the time. I've attached a patch doing this, which also makes a number of other improvements to Rprofmem,

Use macro definition Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw at sous-sol.org> Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-ia64 at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf at skynet.be> --- This is untested. arch/ia64/kernel/paravirt.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git