similar to: linearHypothesis and factors

I am working with a RCB 2x2x3 ANCOVA, and I have noticed a difference in the calculation of sum of squares in a Type III calculation. Anova output is a follows: > Anova(aov(MSOIL~Forest+Burn*Thin*Moisture+ROCK,data=env3l),type=3) Anova Table (Type III tests) Response: MSOIL Sum Sq Df F value Pr(>F) (Intercept) 22.3682 1 53.2141 3.499e-07 *** Forest

For some time I have been looking for a convenient way of performing post-hoc analysis to Repeated Measures ANOVA, that would be acceptable if sphericity is violated (i.e. leaving aside post-hoc to lme models). The best solution I found was John Fox's proposal to similar requests in R-help: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/07/09/26518.html

I'm trying to replicate a time-series cross-sectional analysis (countries over years) with SEs clustered by country. ?The original analysis was done in Stata 10 with: xtreg [DV] [IVs] fe cluster(country). Using plm() in R (cran.r-project.org/web/packages/plm/index.html), I've replicated the coefficients. I sought to estimate country-clustered SEs with vcovHC(), and tried a variety of

Hi, I have encountered this error when attempting a One-way Repeated-measure ANOVA with my data. I have read the "Anova in car: SSPE apparently deficient rank" thread by I'm not sure the within-subject interaction has more degrees of freedom than subjects in my case. I have prepared the following testing script: rm(list = ls())

Forgive me if this is a trivial question, but I couldn't find it an answer in former forums. I'm trying to reproduce some SAS results where they set two parameters equal. For example: y = b1X1 + b2X2 + b1X3 Notice that the variables X1 and X3 both have the same slope and the intercept has been removed. How do I get an estimate of this regression model? I know how to remove the intercept

Ted Harding said: > I can get the estimated RRs from > RRs <- exp(summary(GLM)$coef[,1]) > but do not see how to implement confidence intervals based > on "robust error variances" using the output in GLM. Thanks for the link to the data. Here's my best guess. If you use the following approach, with the HC0 type of robust standard errors in the

How might you fit a generalized linear model (glm) with variance = mu+theta*mu^2 (where mu = mean of the exponential family random variable and theta is a parameter to be estimated)? This appears in Table 2.7 of Fahrmeir and Tutz (2001) Multivariate Statisticial Modeling Based on Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. (Springer, p. 60), where they compare "log-linear model fits to

Here is my smb.conf: [/usr/local/samba/var] # cat /etc/config/smb.conf [global] client schannel = false server schannel = false client ipc signing = false client signing = false server signing = false winbind sealed pipes = false require strong key = false passdb backend = smbpasswd workgroup = HC1 security = ADS server string = encrypt passwords = Yes username level = 0 map to guest = Bad User

Dear all, I am using the heatmap representations of latticeExtra package and I would be interested to draw color side bars representing the groups of a factor of interest. From my understanding of : > help(dendrogramGrob) ... The 'add' argument can be used for additional annotation at the base of the dendrogram. It should be a list with one component for each row,

Stephen, thanks for your effort. The more appropriate list for this discussion is probably R-devel (as far as I understand it) so I've moved the discussion there. Related topics have already been discussed in the past. Specifically, I remember contributions by Paul Johnson ("rockchalk" package) and John Fox ("effects" and "car" package) as their packages

Hi list, This is my domain enviroment and all DC are windows 2008r2 http://i.imgur.com/8cNOtm2.jpeg When I used samba-4.0.5, I join my box to domain "HC1" , I got trusted domain "CHILD2" in "wbinfo -m". [/share/Public] # wbinfo -m BUILTIN MYBOX HC1 CHILD1 TREEROOT HC2 CHILD2 Then I upgraded my box to samba-4.4.4, I lost CHILD2 in "wbinfo -m".

Hello all, I wish to compare two dendrograms (representing Hierarchical Clusterings). My problems are several: 1) how do I manually create a dendrogram object ? That is, how can I reconstruct it as an "hclust" object that creates such a dendrogram, when all I have is the dendrogram image (but don't have the underlaying distance matrix that produced it) ? I see that there is a

Hello everyone, Does anyone know how to implement the argument "unit" in R's plclust function ? I used to use Splus where this argument exists but it has not been implemented in R's plclust. The reason why I switched from Splus to R is that Ward's method is not implemented for S's hclust whereas it is implemented for R's hclust. What I would need is S's plclust

Dear all If I run the model and get the estimated parameter a11. Then I want to use the estimated parameter to calculate the elasticities by using the formula e11=a11/mw1-1. What I have done is using the command of linear. Hypothesis. > formulas1=dWfresh~dlnPfresh+dlnPfrozen+dlnPsmoke+dlnQP+cosL1+sinL1+cosL2 >

Dear list, I would like to run an ANCOVA using car::Anova with repeated measures factors, but I can't figure out how to do it. My (between-subjects) covariate always interacts with my within-subject factors. As far as I understand ANCOVA, covariates usually do not interact with the effects of interest but are simply additive (or am I wrong here?). More specifically, I can add a covariate as

Dear R fans, I have got a difficult sounding problem. For fitting a linear model using continuous response and then for re-fitting the model after excluding every single variable, the following functions can be used. library(MASS) model = lm(perf ~ syct + mmin + mmax + cach + chmin + chmax, data = cpus) dropterm(model, test = "F") But I am not sure whether any similar functions is

Dear friends, Sorry for this somewhat generically titled posting but I had a question with using contrasts in a manova context. So here is my question: Suppose I am interested in doing inference on \beta in the case of the model given by: Y = X %*% \beta + e where Y is a n x p matrix of observations, X is a n x m design matrix, \beta is m x p matrix of parameters, and e is a

Hello, I am work with a linear regression model: y=ax+b with the function of lm. y= observed migration distance of butterflies x= predicted migration distance of butterflies Usually the result will show if the linear term a is significantly different from zero based on the p-value. Now I would like to test if the linear term is significantly different from one. (because I want to know

Dear all, how can I use vcovHC() to get robust/corrected standard errors from an arima() output? I ran an arima model with AR(1) and got the estimate, se, zvalue and p-value using coeftest(arima.output). However, I cannot use vcovHC(arima.output) to get corrected standard errors. It seems vcovHC works only with lm and plm objects? Is there another way I can get robust/corrected

I have a data set with 6 variables and 251 cases. The people who supplied me with this data set believe that it falls naturally into three groups, and have given me a rule for determining group number from these 6 variables. If I do scaled.stuff <- scale(stuff, TRUE, c(...the design ranges...)) stuff.dist <- dist(scaled.stuff) stuff.hc <- hclust(stuff.dist)