similar to: Questions about glht() and interpretation of output from Tukey's in multcomp

Hello, I have used R in the past to conduct multiple comparisons on standard linear models, but am a bit confused as to how to go about doing it with a mixed effects model. I am conducting a bioindication study using carabid beetles in which I have four treatment types (forest harvest types with varying levels of canopy structure retention), and am using canopy closure percent as a covariate in

Hi everyone, I'm witnessing an odd modelling phenomenon that I can't explain. If anyone has seen this before, or can explain what's going on would let me know, I'd be very grateful! Especially if I'm just being dim. I'm fitting a pair of continuous variates and their interaction to some residuals from another model. The sequential anova statement changes with the term

Thanks for your reply Mark, but no, using predict on the new data.frame does not help here. ? I had first thought that the probelm was due?the?explanatory variable (age)?and?the offset one (date) being?very similar (highly?correlated, I am trying to tease their effect apart, and hoped offset would help in this since I know the relationship with age already). But this appears not to be the case.

Dear R Help, I am having difficulty using Variogram within GLS to examine spatial structure of nested data. My data frame consists of ecological measurements of a forest, in which three landscape positions ("landposi") are compared. Each landscape position is replicated five times ("replicat"), and the environment is measured ("canopy", "litdepth", etc.)

Hi, R-users, I have a problem: Because there are few files which can't be readed into R completely, so on the following subsequence programme, I use write.table, which creates the "NA" files for those incomplete files autimatically. I don't want those NA files. My programes formats looks like: name_c<-Sys.glob("C:/Documents and Settings/lma/My

It's been a few weeks I'm racking my brains on how to use the function glht the package multcomp to test interactions. Unfortunately, the creator of the package forgot to put a sample in pdf package how to do it. I have looked in several places, but found nothing. If someone for the love of God can help me I'll be extremely grateful. The model is glm. -- View this message in context:

Dear List, Could you tell why I get the error message? > library(multcomp) > data("cholesterol") > m = aov(response ~ trt, data = cholesterol) > cht <- glht(m, linfct = mcp(trt = "Tukey")) Error: could not find function "glht" Thank you G?bor

fixed @ R-forge. New version should appear on CRAN soon. Thanks for the report! Torsten > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:56:35 +0200 > From: Ulrich Halekoh <Ulrich.Halekoh at agrsci.dk> > To: "r-help at r-project.org" <r-help at r-project.org> > Subject: [R] glht (multcomp): NA's for confidence intervals using

Hi, I have data with binomial response variable (survival) and 2 categorical independent variables (site and treatment) (see below).? I have run a binomial GLM and found that both IVs and the interaction are significant.? Now I want to do a post-hoc test for all pairwise comparisons to see which treatment groups differ.? I tried the glht function in the multcomp package, but I get surprising

Hi dears, I do > CHOL<-lme(chol~rt*cd4+sex+age+rf+nadir+pharmac+factor(hcv)+factor(hbs)+ haartd+hivdur+factor(arv), random= ~rt|id, na.action=na.omit) ...runs sweet,..then ....try a multicomparisons approach for the categorical rf > summary(glht(CHOL, linfct=mcp(rf="Tukey"))) * Error in model.frame.default(object, data, xlev = xlev) : l'oggetto non è una matrice

Hello, I have a question as to how the syntax for glht(package multcomp) and estimable (gmodels) works, since I'm not getting everything from the documents I've googled so far, especially with models with 2nd order terms. A modestly complex model: 2-way anova with one continuous covariate, no random effects(and no repeated measures) to keep it modestly complex: Y = treatmentgroup + sex

Hej, Calculation of confidence intervals for means based on a model fitted with lmer using the package multcomp - yields results for calpha=adjusted_calpha - NA's for calpha=univariate_calpha Example: library(lme4) library(multcomp) ### Generate data set.seed(8) d<-expand.grid(treat=1:2,block=1:3) e<-rnorm(3) names(e)<-1:3 d$y<-rnorm(nrow(d)) + e[d$block]

i ran this model > model2<-glm(rojos~ageandsex+sector+season+sector:season,quasipoisson) > glht(model2,linfct=mcp(ageandsex="Tukey")) General Linear Hypotheses Multiple Comparisons of Means: Tukey Contrasts Linear Hypotheses: Estimate M - H == 0 0.2898 SUB - H == 0 -0.2261 SUB - M == 0 -0.5159 I tried to do the same changing factor season

Hello all, I have a *.csv file that looks like this (actual file is orders of magnitude larger): Site taxa no.ind forest LMA 1 forest LCY 1 forest SCO 1 meadow LMA 2 meadow LCY 1 meadow PNT

Hello R users, I'm analyzing an experiment in a balanced incomplet block design (BIB). The effect of blocks are assumed to be random, so I'm using nlme::lme for this. I'm analysing another more complex experiments and I notice some diferences from doBy::popMeans() compared multcomp::glht() and contrast::contrast(). In my example, glht() and contrast() were equal I suspect popMeans()

Hello, $ objdump -h # displays info about all below sections.... Sections: Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn While, $ llvm-objdump -h # only displays subset of info... Sections: Idx Name Size Address Type Using '--show-lma' could get VMA and LMA details. Can you suggest options to print 'File off' and

Thanks James it seems worked for me :) I am facing some issues in login into bugs.llvm.org, I will file once I get access. Pls feel free if you have login :) Thank you again. From: James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 1:58 PM To: Oza, Hiral <Hiral.Oza at netapp.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] llvm-objdump print

Hi R users, I sent a message yesterday about NA in model estimates ( http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-set-lm-to-don-t-return-NA-in-summary-td3722587.html). If I use aov() instead of lm() I get no NA in model estimates and I use gmodels::estimable() without problems. Ok! Now I'm performing a lot of contrasts and I need correcting for multiplicity. So, I can use multcomp::glht() for this.

Hello everyone, I've conducted a Type III repeated-measures ANOVA using Anova() from the car package, based on the suggestions at http://blog.gribblelab.org/2009/03/09/repeated-measures-anova-using-r/(option 3) and http://languagescience.umd.edu/wiki/EEG#ERP_ANOVA_in_R. My ANOVA has two factors: Condition (3 levels) and Region (6 levels) and their interaction. Below is code to run the Anova

Hi, I am new to this list. I have a question regarding including both spatial and temporal random factors in lmer. These two are not nested, and an example of model I try to fit is model1<-lmer(Richness~Y+Canopy+Veg_cm+Treatment+(1|Site/Block/Plot)+(1|Year), family=poisson, REML=FALSE), where richness = integer Y & Treatment = factor Canopy & Veg_cm = numerical, continous