similar to: FreeBSD Security Notice FreeBSD-SN-02:05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-02:02 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-05-13 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports

I am running 4.8-STABLE. I recently did a cvsup (repeatedly, most recently today). Ever since, portupgrade dies with the following messages: zircon# portupgrade -r pkgconfig /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:903:in `tsort_build' from

Hi! There is a little problem in the security/isakmpd port. There are some gen*.sh scripts in it, which generate some C header (and src) files. These scripts are using awk, tr, etc - some generic UNIX tools. One of the tools has problems with some localisations, so these scripts generate incorrect C-code. Eg, I have Hungarian localisation set, so I have the following in my environ:

Hai Mourik Jan, ? This is the script we use, this is the work my collega. ( see the developed by, thats his company?) This is a "as is"? share, so read the code, we added as much as possible info in there. ? Few extra pointers, - speed up the script by useing ramdisk, make sure your ramdisk has the space for the bigest pdf you want to create. ??? we did limit the max size in the

Hi, I have a rekeying problem between FreeBSD4.9 (running isakmpd) and a Cisco 7000 box. The rekeying time of these two are not same, so even they new SAs are created on isakmpd side, the tunnel doesn't work at all. On isakmpd side, I know it creates new SA when SA life time passes 90%. But I don't know when Cisco builds the new SAs. I don't have much knowledge on Cisco and I cannot

Hi all, I've successfully compiled R-1.2 on a Linux box (Mandrake 7.1). However, when I installed packages from sources, I run into problems with the packages logspline and tseries. The error messages are as follows. Can anyone help? The compiler is gcc 2.95.3, if that helps. Andy ================================================ Installing source package `logspline' ... libs gcc

Since there never was an answer on the secureshell at securityfocus.com list to this question, I thought I'd ask you guys on your own list and maybe I'll even get an answer. If the answer involves PAM in any way, then the most obvious question becomes "what about IRIX, Tru64, or any other platforms whose login procedure does not have PAM?". ----- Forwarded message from Atro

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [216.102.46.4]) by blues.jpj.net (right/backatcha) with SMTP id VAA15167 for <trevor@JPJ.NET>; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 28179 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 19:14:06 -0000 Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (216.102.46.4) by lists.securityfocus.com

Hi There, re. the recently reported buffer overflow in icecast, is there any "official" security patch against 1.3.11 ? I am reluctant to take any un-official patch like this one ;-) There is nothing on www.icecast.org/releases, maybe it's somewhere else ? Thanks. Alfredo <p><p>>Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm >List-Id:

Can anyone provide more details about the posting below ? >Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm >List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com> >List-Post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com> >List-Help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> >List-Subscribe:

Hi, This advisory has a bit more than the Red Hat one.... Roger. ----- Forwarded message from Alfred Huger ----- >>From owner-bugtraq@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Mon Nov 22 18:49:41 1999 Approved-By: aleph1@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9911220906250.11753-100000@www.securityfocus.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:08 -0800 X-Reply-To: Alfred Huger

Since the number of responses to my query was large, Roger has asked me to summarise the information. The summary is listed below Thanks to all the people who bothered to help me out: Alan Mead <adm@ipat.com> Beattie, Jay <JBeattie@accdir.com> Bruce Elrick <bruce.elrick@saltus.ab.ca> Christian Hammers <ch@lathspell.westend.com> David J. M. Karlsen

SSH.COM says their SSH2 is not vulnerable to the ZLIB problem even though they use the library (details below). Can OpenSSH say the same thing? In either case, it seems like there ought to be an openssh-unix-announce message about what the situation is. I may have missed it, but I don't believe there was one. Yes, openssh doesn't have its own copy of zlib source but it would still be

I have the task to make an IPsec tunnel between a Cisco router and a Linux router. The people that have set the Cisco router have sent me this (Cisco) config file, but that doesn''t help me a lot since I don''t understand nor ipsec nor Cisco syntax that well. So, can anyone help me to make the ipsec configuration? Second, what''s better to use ipsec-tools or isakmpd on

CORE SDI http://www.core-sdi.com SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Date Published: 2001-02-08 Advisory ID: CORE-20010207 Bugtraq ID: 2347 CVE CAN: CAN-2001-0144 Title: SSH1 CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability Class: Boundary Error Condition Remotely Exploitable: Yes Locally Exploitable: Yes Release Mode:

Hi, Please advice me about the below reported vulnerability. High OpenSSH X Connections Session Hijacking Vulnerability Risk: High Application: ssh Port: 22 Protocol: tcp ScriptID: 100584 Overview: OpenSSH is prone to a vulnerability that allows attackers to hijack forwarded X connections. Successfully exploiting this issue may allow an attacker run arbitrary shell commands with the privileges

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Eygene Ryabinkin >Organization: Code Labs >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] [vuxml] net/wireshark: fix DoS in SMTP dissector >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Description: Today the DoS

X-PMC-CI-e-mail-id: 13726 Hi, I have been a successful user of Openssh for some time. I am attaching two articles from BugTraq. Hopefully, they show exactly the security problems reported in the BugTraq mailing list. [Pity that no one seemed to have bothered to contact the mailing list(s) for openssh development.] I am not sure what the right fixes would be. But at least, people need to be

Dear all, Browsing through the securityfocus vulnerability database I found two items, that might interesting for the FreeBSD community: 1. GNU GNATS Syslog() Format String Vulnerability http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10609 GNATS is vital part of the PR handling of FreeBSD. I think security officers should contact developers of GNU GNATS about this issue to resolve the potential problem.

Since i/we didn't receive any answer on secureshell at securityfocus.com I like to ask this question to you. What's your opinion on this topic? Thanks! Miro +-------------------------------+ +-------------------------------+ | Miro Dietiker | | MD Systems Miro Dietiker | +-------------------------------+ +-------------------------------+ -----Urspr?ngliche